Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · Apologia pro Responsione sua · Apology for His Answer to the Book of James, King of Great Britain, Entitled Triplici Nodo Triplex Cuneus

Chapter 2: That the Cause of the King of the English Is Not Common with the Orthodox and Catholic Kings and Princes

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. XII, Apologia pro Responsione sua ad Librum Jacobi Magnae Britanniae Regis, an apology of 1609. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

At the beginning of his monitory preface the king of the English tries to make his cause common with all Christian kings and princes: “A common cause,” he says, “is at stake, and one which pertains to the right and dignity not only of all kings, but also of all others to whom the supreme power of civil affairs has been entrusted by God.” But why a common cause is at stake he touches in a single word, when he says that this book of his contains an Apology for the oath of fidelity; from which he wishes it understood that he fights against the Roman Pontiff for the oath of fidelity which ought to be rendered, and is wont to be, by subjects to all kings and princes. As if the Roman Pontiff forbade oaths of that kind, and wished to strip kings and princes of all power. But the king labours in vain to make that cause common. For neither did the Supreme Pontiff in his Briefs to the English Catholics, nor I in my letter to the Archpriest of England, disapprove any oath of fidelity whatever, but an oath which, under the appearance of civil fidelity, contained a denial of the pontifical authority; nor do Catholic kings and princes wish fidelity to be so sworn to them by their peoples that the authority of the Supreme Pontiff is denied. Which two things if I can show, no doubt will be left to anyone that the cause of the king of England is his own, and has nothing in common with the cause of Catholic kings and princes.

That, then, the oath which the king of England calls one of fidelity and civil obedience is not an oath of simple fidelity, nor of civil obedience only, is clear from the title of the edict by which this oath is prescribed; for this is the title: “For the detecting and repressing of Papists.” The end of this oath, then, is not to detect the seditious, the disobedient, rebels; but Papists, that is, those who venerate the Supreme Pontiff as the Vicar of Christ. Nor is the end to keep the peoples in that obedience which is owed to kings and princes; but to repress Papists, who show civil obedience to kings, but refuse to acknowledge the king as head or supreme governor of the Church in spiritual things, and refuse to deny the Apostolic primacy of the Supreme Pontiff. But since I have treated what pertains to this place copiously enough in the answer to the king's book which is entitled Triplici nodo triplex cuneus, and this same answer, printed again, is carried here annexed, I refer the reader to it, lest by repeating the same twice I weary both myself and the reader in vain. But that orthodox kings and princes so wish fidelity and obedience to be sworn and shown to them by the peoples subject to them that at the same time they wish their own fidelity and obedience to the Supreme Pontiff, as the Vicar of Christ, to be preserved, is shown clearer than light by the very reverence and obedience which they themselves lately, according to custom, publicly showed to this same Supreme Pontiff Paul V through their legates, most distinguished men. For we saw, with all Rome looking on, the legates of the commonwealth of Lucca, then of Genoa, and lastly of Venice, arrive at the City with a most splendid retinue, kiss the feet of the Supreme Pontiff, and in Latin and most elegant speech show reverence and obedience in the name of the whole commonwealth. We saw not long after the king of the Spains through his ambassador, the most illustrious and most excellent Duke of Feria; and after some time the most Christian king of the French through his ambassador, the most illustrious and most excellent Duke of Nevers, with such a retinue of nobles and such a multitude of noble men as became the magnificence of such great kings, kiss the feet of the same Supreme Pontiff, and render him in the amplest words through their most eloquent orators the reverence and obedience which is by right owed to Saint Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and his successors. Nor were the other supreme and free princes wanting to their duty, as many as are counted by the Catholic name, whether Germans, or French, or Italians; with less display indeed, but with equal piety and devotion.

Wherefore if orthodox kings and princes publicly profess that obedience is owed by all Christians to the supreme head of the Church, the Roman Pontiff, and themselves by their example go before the peoples whom they have undertaken to rule; and the Supreme Pontiff not only does not disapprove oaths of fidelity toward kings and princes, but approves and praises them, and compels their keeping, when need is, by ecclesiastical censures; what has the cause of the king of the English in common with the rest, since he himself contends for this above all, to turn his peoples from obedience to the Supreme Pontiff, and in that way to separate them from the body of Christ, which is the Church, and sink them with himself into hell? For true is that sentence of Leo the Great in the epistle to the bishops of the province of Vienne: “Whoever thinks the primacy is to be denied to this See can in no way lessen its dignity; but, puffed up with the spirit of his own pride, sinks himself into hell.” Which being so, the king could have abstained from those words which he brought forth to the injury of all Catholic princes: “Awake, therefore, while there is time, and do not allow the sinews of your authority to be cut in each of you, through too long a sleep, to the ruin of all”; as if the king of the English alone were awake, alone were wise; the rest all asleep and foolish; and as if kings could not keep the sinews of their authority whole unless they themselves cut the sinews of the pontifical authority. Let the king of the English rather awake, and carefully weigh the word of the Lord: Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. Let him hear also the Apostle of Christ, who, as in Romans 13 he admonishes the peoples to be subject and obey the temporal powers, and to render custom to whom custom is due, and tribute to whom tribute is due, so admonishes the same in Hebrews 13 to obey their spiritual prelates, and be subject to them, who watch as being to render account for their souls.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  II. 
Quod,  non  sit  communis  causa  regis  A  ng lo¬ 
rum,  cum  regibus,  et  principibus  ortho¬ 
doxis,  et  Catholicis. 
Initio  suae  monitoriae  praefationis  conatur 
rex  Anglorum,  communem  facere  causam 
suam  cum  omnibus  regibus,  et  principibus 
Christianis  :  «  Causa,  inquit,  communis  agi¬ 
tur,  et  quae  ad  jus,  dignitatemque  pertinet 
omnium  non  modo  regum  ,  sed  aliorum 
etiam  quibuscumque  suprema  est  a  Deo  re¬ 
rum  civilium  demandata  potestas.  » 
Cur  autem  communis  causa  agatur,  unico 
verbo  attingit,  cum  ait,  hoc  libro  suo  conti¬ 
neri  Apologiam  pro  juramento  fidelitatis,  ex 
quo  intelligi  vult,  pugnare  se  adversus  Ro¬ 
manum  Pontificem  pro  juramento  fidelitatis, 
quod  omnibus  regibus,  atque  principibus 
praestari  debet,  et  solet  a  subditis.  Quasi 
Pontifex  Romanus  ejusmodi  juramenta  pro¬ 
hibeat,  ac  velit  reges,  et  principes  omni  po¬ 
testate  exuere. 
Sed  ( a )  frustra  laborat  rex,  ut  causam 
istam  communem  faciat.  Nam  neque  sum¬ 
mus  Pontifex  in  Brevibus  suis  ad  Catholicos 
Anglos ;  neque  ego  in  epistola  mea  ad  Ar- 
chipresbyterum  Angliae,  juramentum  quod- 
cumque  fidelitatis  improbavimus,  sed  jura¬ 
mentum,  quod  sub  specie  civilis  fidelitatis, 
abnegationem  Pontificiae  auctoritatis  conti¬ 
nebat  :  neque  reges,  et  principes  Catholici 
ita  sibi  jurari  volunt  a  populis  fidelitatem; 
ut  summi  Pontificis  auctoritas  abnegetur. 
Quae  duo  si  demonstrare  potuero,  nemini 
dubium  relinquetur,  quin  causa  regis  Angliae 
125 
propria  ipsius  sit,  neque  aliquid  commune 
habeat  cum  causa  regum,  et  principum  Ca¬ 
tholicorum. 
Quod  igitur  juramentum,  quod  rex  Anglia? 
fidelitatis,  et  civilis  obedientiae  vocat,  non 
sit  juramentum  simplicis  fidelitatis,  neque 
solius  civilis  obedientiae,  perspicuum  est  ex 
titulo  edicti,  quo  juramentum  hoc  praescri¬ 
bitur,  hic  enim  est  titulus  :  «  Ad  detegendos 
et  reprimendos  Papistas.  »  Finis  igitur  hu¬ 
jus  juramenti  non  est,  detegere  seditiosos, 
inobedientes,  rebelles  ;  sed  Papistas,  id  est, 
eos,  qui  summum  Pontificem,  ut  Christi 
Vicarium  venerantur.  Neque  finis  est  conti¬ 
nere  populos  in  ea  obedientia,  quae  regibus, 
et  principibus  debetur  ;  sed  reprimere  Pa¬ 
pistas,  qui  civilem  obedientiam  regibus  exhi¬ 
bent;  sed  nolunt  regem  agnoscere  caput, 
vel  supremum  gubernatorem  Ecclesiae  in 
spiritualibus ;  neque  volunt  primatum  Apo- 
stolicum  summi  Pontificis  abnegare.  Sed 
quoniam  ea,  quae  ad  hunc  locum  pertinent, 
satis  copiose  tractavi  in  responsione  ad  librum 
regis,  qui  inscribitur  :  Triplici  nodo  triplex 
cuneus  ;  et  haec  ipsa  responsio  denuo  recusa 
hic  adjuncta  fertur  ;  ad  eamdem  remitto 
lectorem,  ne  bis  eadem  repetendo,  et  me, 
et  lectorem  frustra  fatigem. 
Quod  autem  reges,  et  principes  orthodoxi 
ita  velint  fidelitatem,  et  obedientiam  a  po¬ 
pulis  sibi  subjectis  jurari,  et  exhiberi ;  ut  si¬ 
mul  velint  suam  Pontifici  Maximo ,  ut 
Christi  Vicario,  fidelitatem,  et  obedientiam 
conservari  :  ex  ipsa  reverentia,  et  obedien¬ 
tia,  quam  ipsi  nuper,  de  more,  huic  ipsi 
Summo  Pontifici  Paulo  V.  publice  per  lega¬ 
tos  suos,  viros  amplissimos  exhibuerunt, luce 
clarius  demonstratur. 
Vidimus  enim  tota  spectante  Roma  ( b ), 
Legatos  reipub.  Lucensis,  deinde  Genuensis, 
ac  demum  Veneta?,  cum  splendidissimo  co¬ 
mitatu  ad  Urbem  advenire,  Summi  Ponti¬ 
ficis  pedes  deosculari,  latina,  et  pereleganti 
oratione  reverentiam,  et  obedientiam  nomi¬ 
ne  totius  reipublicee  exhibere.  Vidimus  non 
diu  post,  regem  Hispaniarum  per  oratorem 
suum  illustrissimum,  et  excellentissimum 
Ferise  ducem ;  ac  post  aliquod  tempus  re¬ 
gem  Francorum  Christianissimum  per  ora¬ 
torem  suum  illustrissimum,  et  excellentissi¬ 
mam  ducem  Nivernensem,  cum  eo  procerum 
(a)  Frustra  conatur  Jacobus  rex  causam  suam  communem  facere  cum  Principibus  orthodoxis. 
—  [b)  Honorificas  legationes  ad  Paulum  V.  Pont.  Max.  causa  exhibendas  reverentiae ,  et  praestandae 
obedientiae ,  more  majorum . 
126 
APOLOGIS  CAPUT  III. 
comitatu,  eaque  nobilium  virorum  multitu¬ 
dine,  quce  tantorum  regum  magnificentiam 
decebat,  ejusdem  Summi  Pontificis  deoscu¬ 
lari  pedes,  eique  amplissimis  verbis  per  elo- 
quentissimos  oratores  suos  reverentiam,  et 
obedientiam  preestare,  quce  S.  Petro  Aposto¬ 
lorum  Principi,  ejusque  successoribus  jure 
debetur.  Nec  defuerunt  officio  suo  supremi, 
ac  liberi  Principes  cceteri,  quotquot  nomine 
Catholico  censentur,  sive  Germani,  sive  Gal¬ 
li,  sive  Itali ;  apparatu  quidem  minore,  sed 
pietate,  et  devotione  pari. 
Quare  si  reges,  ac  principes  orthodoxi 
publice  profitentur  obedientiam  supremo 
Ecclesise  capiti,  Romano  Pontifici,  a  Chri¬ 
stianis  omnibus  deberi ;  et  ipsi  exemplo  suo 
'  prseeunt  populos,  quos  regendos  suscepe¬ 
runt  :  Et  Pontifex  Maximus  non  modo  non 
improbat  juramenta  fidelitatis  erga  reges,  et 
principes  sed  probat,  et  laudat ,  et  ad  ea 
servanda,  cum  opus  est,  censuris  Ecclesia¬ 
sticis  cogit  :  quid  habet  commune  causa  re¬ 
gis  Anglorum  cum  ceeteris;  cum  ipse  hoc  in 
primis  contendat,  ut  populos  suos  ab  obe- 
dientia  Summi  Pontificis  avertat,  atque  eo 
modo  a  Christi  corpore,  quod  est  Ecclesia, 
separet,  ac  secum  in  inferna  demergat.  .Ve¬ 
ra  est  enim  sententia  illa  Magni  Leonis  in 
epist.  ad  Episcopos  Provinciae  Viennensis  : 
«  Quisquis  huic  Sedi  Principatum  existimat 
denegandum,  illius  quidem  nullo  modo  po¬ 
test  minuere  dignitatem ;  sed  inflatus  spi¬ 
ritu  superbiae  suae  semetipsum  in  inferna 
demergit.  » 
Quae  cum  ita  sint,  poterat  rex  ab  illis  ver¬ 
bis  abstinere,  quae  in  injuriam  omnium  Ca¬ 
tholicorum  principum  protulit  :  «  Exper- 
giscimini  igitur,  dum  tempus  est,  neque  si¬ 
nite  sommo  diuturniore  incidi  in  singulis,  ad 
ruinam  universorum,  auctoritatis  vestrae  ner¬ 
vos  :  »  quasi  unus  rex  Anglorum  vigilet, 
unus  sapiat ;  caeteri  dormiant,  et  desipiant 
universi  :  neque  possint  reges  auctoritatis 
suae  nervos  integros  servare,  nisi  auctori¬ 
tatis  Pontificiae  nervos  ipsi  praecidant.  Ex- 
pergiscatur  potius  rex  Anglorum,  et  verbum 
Domini  diligenter  expendat  :  Reddite  quce 
sunt  Caesaris  Caesari,  et  quae  sunt  Dei  Deo. 
Audiat  et  Apostolum  Christi,  qui  quemad¬ 
modum  ad  Rom.  xm.  admonet  populos  ut 
subjecti  sint,  et  obediant  temporalibus  po¬ 
testatibus,  et  reddant  vectigal,  cui  debetur 
vectigal ,  et  tributum  cui  debetur  tributum ; 
ita  eosdem  monet,  ad  Heb.  xm.  ut  obediant 
spiritualibus  praepositis,  et  subjaceant  eis, 
qui  pervigilant,  quasi  rationem  pro  anima- 
bus  ipsorum  reddituri. 
← Chapter 1Chapter 3 →