Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Loss of Grace · Book IV: On Original Sin

Chapter 6: The same truth is proved from ecclesiastical definition

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. V, De Amissione Gratiae et Statu Peccati, Book IV. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

Now we shall bring forward the judgments not of single men, but of the Churches themselves, or Councils, by which that error of Pelagius, Caelestius, and Julian — which Lefèvre, Erasmus, and Zwingli have renewed in our age — was publicly condemned. And we have the judgments of the whole world.

For first, in the East, the Palestinian Council, of 14 bishops, so condemned this error that it compelled Pelagius himself to condemn the same error. St. Augustine mentions this Synod, book 1 against Julian, chapter 2 [al. 5], epistle 106, and elsewhere.

Then in the West we have from Africa the Council of Milevis, which in canon 2 decreed thus: “It has pleased that whoever denies that little ones fresh from their mothers' wombs are to be baptized, or says that they are indeed baptized for the remission of sins, but draw from Adam nothing of original sin which is expiated by the laver of regeneration, be anathema.” We have likewise from Africa the most numerous national Council of Carthage — of 217 bishops, namely — which, after the confirmation obtained from Zosimus the supreme Pontiff, was received by the whole world, as St. Prosper relates in the Chronicle at the year 420.

From Spain we have the Sixth Council of Toledo, canon 1, where we read thus: “Of these three persons of the divinity we confess that the Son alone came forth from the secret and hidden place of the Father for the redemption of the human race — for the loosing of the debts of faults which we contracted originally through the disobedience of Adam, and by our own free choice — and took up humanity without sin from the holy ever-Virgin.” See also the Twelfth Council of Toledo, canon 2 [al. 1].

From Gaul we have the Second Council of Orange, canon 2, where we read thus: “If anyone asserts that the transgression of Adam harmed himself alone, and not his offspring; or at least testifies that only the death of the body, which is the punishment of sin, and not also sin, which is the death of the soul, passed through one man into the whole human race — he will ascribe injustice to God, contradicting the Apostle, who says: By one man sin entered into this world, and by sin death; and so death passed upon all men,” etc.

From Germany we have the Council of Mainz, canon 5, where we read thus: “This sin of the first men passed by propagation into all men, and draws its punishment with it, so that all men are guilty of the wrath of God, of damnation, and of death, and prone to sin.”

From Italy we have the responses of the ancient supreme Pontiffs — Innocent, Zosimus, Celestine, Leo, Gregory. For blessed Innocent I openly condemned that error, which arose in the time of his pontificate, as Augustine testifies, book 1 against Julian, chapter 2 [al. 4], and epistle 157. And there is extant an epistle of the same Innocent to the Council of Milevis, in which he confirms the decrees of that Council, and among other things speaks thus: “If, then, they will have it that not to be born again hinders nothing, they must needs confess that neither do the sacred streams of regeneration profit,” etc. The epistle of blessed Zosimus to the bishops of the whole world is not extant, but St. Augustine recites these words of his in epistle 157 to Optatus: “The Lord is faithful in his words, and his Baptism holds the same fullness in deed and in words — that is, in work, in confession, and in the true remission of sins — in every sex, age, and condition of the human race. For no one is made free except him who is the slave of sin; nor can he be called redeemed, except him who has truly been before a captive through sin, as it is written: If the Son shall make you free, you shall be free indeed. For through him we are born again spiritually; through him we are crucified to the world; by his death is torn up that handwriting — introduced from Adam and transmitted to every soul — of the death brought upon us all, contracted by propagation; by which handwriting absolutely no one of those born is not held bound, before he be freed through baptism.” After these words recited, Augustine subjoins thus: “In these words of the Apostolic see the Catholic faith is so ancient and founded, certain and clear, that it would be a wickedness for a Christian to doubt of it.”

Blessed Celestine, in the first epistle to the Gauls, after the end of the epistle annexes certain chapters — pronouncing that whatever is contrary to them is by no means to be held Catholic. In chapter 4 he says thus: “In the transgression of Adam all men lost their natural possibility and innocence.” In chapter 12 he speaks again thus: “That which the holy Church does uniformly throughout the whole world with regard to those to be baptized, we contemplate with no idle gaze: that whether little ones or young men come to the Sacrament of regeneration, they do not approach the font of life before the unclean spirit is driven from them by the exorcisms and exsufflations of the clerics — that then it may truly appear how the prince of this world is cast out, and how the strong one is first bound, and thereafter his vessels are plundered, carried over into the possession of the victor, who leads captivity captive, and gives gifts to men.”

St. Leo I, epistle 86 [al. 35], to Nicetas of Aquileia, speaks thus: “But they say that this is forestalled by natural industry, so that the nature which is bright toward grace by its own effort may seem wounded by no wound of original sin. Therefore they also say that little ones, if they depart hence from the world without Baptism, cannot be damned, nor be held guilty in the sin of Adam, but come to the kingdom, or to eternal life, without any delay — whereas the Apostle says: By one man sin entered into this world, and by sin death, and so it passed upon all men; on which account the little ones themselves also are baptized.”

St. Gregory, in epistle 53, book 7 [al. 9], to Secundinus: “This,” says he, “is not uncertain: that unless a man be reborn by the grace of sacred Baptism, every soul is bound fast by the chains of original sin.” To these come last two universal Councils, the Florentine and the Tridentine; of which the former, in the letters of union, teaches thus: “But the souls of those who depart in actual mortal sin, or in original alone, descend straightway into hell, yet to be punished with unequal punishments.” And the latter, in session 5, in the decree on the sin of origin, repeats word for word the decrees of the ancient Councils of Milevis and Orange. Which things being so, there remains absolutely no doubt concerning the faith of the Catholic Church — so that Erasmus, Lefèvre, Zwingli, and the Anabaptists could not, without incredible temerity, again renew an error so often condemned.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  VI. 

Probatur  eadem  veritas  ex  definitione 
Ecclesiastica. 

Nunc  afferemus  judicia  non  singulorum 
hominum,  sed  ipsarum  Ecclesiarum,  sive 
Conciliorum,  quibus  error  ille  Pelagii,  Coe- 
lestii  et  Juliani,  quem  Faber,  Erasinus  et 
Zwinglius  nostro  sacculo  renovarunt,  pu¬ 
blice  damnatus  fuit.  Habemus  autem  judi¬ 
cia  totius  orbis  terrarum. 

Primum  enim  in  Oriente  Concilium  Palc- 
stinum,  Episcoporum  44.  errorem  hunc  ita 
damnavit,  ut  Pelagium  ipsum  ad  eumdem 
errorem  damnandum  compulerit.  Meminit 
hujus  Synodi  S.  Augustinus  lib.  i.  in  Julia¬ 
num  cap.  2.  epist.  100.  et  alibi. 

Deinde  in  Occidente  habemus  ex  Africa 
Concilium  Milevitanum,  quod  in  2.  can.  ita 
statuit  :  «  Placuit,  ut  quicumque  parvulos 
recentes  ab  uteris  matrum  baptizandos  ne¬ 
gat,  aut  dicit,  in  remissionem  peccatorum  cos 
quidem  baptizari,  sed  nihil  cx  Adamo  tra¬ 


here  originalis  peccati,  quod  lavacro  rege¬ 
nerationis  expietur,  anathema  sit.  » 

Habemus  item  ex  Africa  Concilium  Car¬ 
thaginiense  nationale  frequentissimum,  Epi¬ 
scoporum  videlicet  21 7,  quod  postconfirmatio- 
nem  a  Zozimo  summo  Pontifice  obtentam,  a 
toto  orbe  receptum  fuit,  ut  refert  S.  Prosper 
in  Chronico  ad  annum  420. 

Ex  Hispania  habemus  Concilium  Toleta¬ 
num  VI.  can.  i.  ubi  sic  legimus  :  «  Ex  his 
tribus  divinitatis  personis  solum  Filium  fa¬ 
temur  ad  redemptionem  humani  generis 
propter  culparum  debita,  quie  per  inobe- 
dientiam  Adse  originaliter,  et  nostro  libero 
arbitrio  contraximus,  resolvenda,  a  secreto 
Patris,  arcanoque  prodiisse,  et  humanitatem 
sine  peccato  de  sancta  semper  Virgine  as¬ 
sumpsisse.  »  Vide  etiam  Concilium  Toleta¬ 
num  XII.  can.  2. 

Ex  Gallia  habemus  Concilium  Arausica- 
num  II.  canon.  2.  ubi  sic  legimus  :  «  Si  quis 
soli  Ada;  prsevaricationem  suam,  et  non  ejus 
propagini  asserit  nocuisse  ;  aut  certe  mor¬ 
tem  tantum  corporis,  quee  poena  est  peccati, 
non  autem  et  peccatum,  quod  est  mors  ani¬ 
ma),  per  unum  hominem  in  omne  genus  hu¬ 
manum  transisse  testatur,  injustitiam  Deo 
dabit,  contradicens  Apostolo  dicenti.  Per  u- 
nnm  hominem  peccatum  in  hunc  mumdum 
intravit,  et  per  peccatum  mors,  et  ita  in  om¬ 
nes  homines  mors  pertransiit  etc.» 

Ex  Germania  habemus  Concilium  Mogun- 
tinum,  can.  S.  ubi  sic  legimus  :  «Hoc  pri¬ 
morum  hominum  peccatum  propagatione 
in  omnes  homines  transiit,  ctsecum  poenam 
suam  trahit,  ut  sint  omnes  homines  ira)  Dei, 
damnationis,  et  rftortis  rei,  et  ad  peccatum 
proni. » 

Ex  Italia  habemus  responsa  veterum  sum¬ 
morum  Pontificum,  Innocentii,  Zozimi,  Cce- 
lestini,  Leonis,  Gregorii.  Nam  B.  Innocen¬ 
tius  I.  exortum  errorem  istum,  tempore  sui 
Pontificatus,  aperte  damnavit,  ut  Augustinus 
testatur  lib.  i.  in  Julianum  cap.  2.  et  epist. 
137.  Extat  autem  epist.  ejusdem  Innocentii 
ad  Concilium  Milevitanum,  in  qua  confirmat 
ejus  Concilii  decreta,  et  inter  alia  sic  loqui¬ 
tur  :  «  Si  ergo  nihil  volunt  officere  non  re¬ 
nasci,  fateantur  necesse  est,  nec  regenera¬ 
tionis  sacra  fluenta  prodesse  etc.  »  B.  Zozimi 
epist.  ad  Episcopos  totius  orbis  non  extat, 
sed  ejus  ha)C  verba  recitat  S.  Augustinus  in 
epistol.  137.  adOptatum  :  «  Fidelis  Dominus 
in  verbis  suis,  ejusque  Baptismus  re,  ac  ver¬ 
bis,  id  est,  opere,  confessione,  ct  remissione 


CAPUT  VII. 


343 


vora  peccatorum,  in  omni  sexu,  aetate,  con¬ 
ditione  generis  humani,  eamdem  plenitudi¬ 
nem  tenet.  Nullus  enim  nisi  qui  peccati  ser¬ 
vus  est,  liber  efficitur,  nec  redemptus  dici 
potest,  nisi  qui  vere  per  peccatumfuerit  ante 
captivus,  sicut  scripturo  est :  Si  vos  filius  li¬ 
beraverit,  vere  liberi  eritis.  Per  ipsum  enim 
renascimur  spiritualiter,  per  ipsum  crucifi¬ 
gimur  mundo  :  ipsius  morte  mortis  ab  Adam 
omnibus  nobis  introductae,  atque  transmissae 
universae  animae  illud  propagatione  contra¬ 
ctum  chyrographum  rumpitur,  in  quo  nullus 
omnino  natorum,  antequam  per  baptismum 
liberetur,  non  tenetur  obnoxius  ».  Post  haec 
verba  recitata  ita  subjungit  Augustinus  :  «In 
his  verbis  Apostolicae  sedis  tam  antiqua,  at¬ 
que  fundata,  certa  et  clara  est  Catholica  fi¬ 
des,  ut  nefas  sit  de  illa  dubitare  Christia¬ 
no.  i) 

B.  Coeleslinus  in  epistol.  ad  Gallos  prima, 
post  finem  epistolae  annectit  aliquot  capi¬ 
tula,  quibus  quidquid  contrarium  est^  mini¬ 
me  Catholicum  habendum  esse  pronuntiat, 
in  4.  cap.  sic  ait  :  «  In  praevaricatione  Adafc 
omnes  homines  naturalem  possibilitatem,  et 
innocentiam  perdidisse.  »  In  cap.  12.  sicrur- 
sus  loquitur  :  «  Illud  quod  circa  baptizandos 
in  universo  mundo  sancta  Ecclesia  unifor¬ 
miter  agit,  non  otiosio  contemplamur  in¬ 
tuitu,  cum  sive  parvuli,  sive  juvenes  ad  rege¬ 
nerationis  veniunt  Sacramentum,  non  prius 
fontem  vitae  adeunt,  quam  exorcismis,  et 
exsufflationibus  clericorum,  spiritus  ab  eis 
immundus  abigatur  :  ut  tunc  vere  appareat, 
quo  modo  princeps  mundi  hujus  mittatur 
foras,  et  quo  modo  prius  alligetur  fortis,  et 
deinceps  vasa  ejus  diripianturin  possessionem 
translata  victoris,  qui  captivam  ducit  capti¬ 
vitatem,  et  dat  dona  hominibus.  » 

S.  Leo  I.  epist.  8G.  ad  Nicetam  Aquile- 
iensem  ita  loquitur  :  «  Sed  ab  istis  ideo  per 
naturalem  industriam  dicitur  praeveniri,  ut 
qua;  ad  gratiam  proprio  clara  sit  studio,  nul¬ 
lo  videatur  peccati  originalis  vulnere  saucia¬ 
ta.  Ideo  etiam  parvulos  dicunt,  si  sine  Ba¬ 
ptismo  hinc  de  saeculo  exierint,  non  posse 
damnari,  neque  reos  in  peccato  Adae  teneri, 
sed  ad  regnum,  vel  ad  vitam  aeternam  sine 
ulla  cunctatione  venire,  cum  Apostolus  di¬ 
cat.  Per  unum  hominem  peccatum  in  hunc 
mundum  intravit,  et  per  peccatum  mors, 
et  ita  in  omnes  homines  pertransiit,  propter 
quod  et  ipsi  parvuli  baptizantur.  » 


S.  Gregorius  in  epist.  53.  lib.  vil.  ad  Se- 
cundinum  :  «Illud,  inquit,  incertum  non  est, 
quia  nisi  sacri  Baptismatis  gratia  fuerit  rena¬ 
tus  homo,  omnis  anima  originalis  peccati 
vinculis  est  obstricta.  »  His  accedunt  postre¬ 
mo  Concilia  universalia  duo,  Florentinum  et 
Tridentinum,  quorum  illud  in  litteris  unionis 
sic  docet  :  «  Illorum  autem  animas,  qui  in 
actuali  mortali  peccato,  vel  solo  originali  de¬ 
cedunt,  mox  in  infernum  descendere,  poenis 
tamen  disparibus  puniendos  ».  Istud  autem 
sess.  5.  in  decreto  de  peccato  originis,  ad 
verbum  repetit  decreta  Conciliorum  veterum 
Milevitani  et  Arausicani.  Quae  cum  ita  sint, 
nulla  omnino  remanet  de  fide  Catholicae  Ec¬ 
clesiae  dubitatio  :  ut  non  potuerint  Erasmus, 
Faber,  Zwinglius  atque  Anabaptistae  sine  in¬ 
credibili  temeritate  errorem  toties  damna¬ 
tum,  iterum  innovare.
← Chapter 5Chapter 7 →