Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Church Militant · The Church Spread Throughout the Whole World

Chapter 8: On the Imperfect

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. II, De Ecclesia Militante, On the Church Militant (of the controversy On Councils and the Church). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

That the imperfect can be in the Church, against the opinion of the Pelagians and Anabaptists, can easily be proved; for if those who have some imperfection were not in the Church, there would have been, nor would be, nor would be to come, no Church on earth. For except Christ and the blessed Virgin, who alone do not make up the Church, there are none, however holy in this life, who have not some venial sins, which yet do not take away justice, nor make a man an enemy of God, as the Pelagians thought. Which the divine letters first of all testify. Psalm 31: Thou hast forgiven the impiety of my sin: for this shall every one that is holy pray to thee in a seasonable time. For what is for this, but for remission? And so someone is holy, and yet has that which he asks to be remitted to himself. 3 Kings 8: For there is no man who sinneth not. Proverbs 24: The just man shall fall seven times a day, and shall rise again. Ecclesiastes 7: There is no just man upon earth that doth good and sinneth not. Matthew 6, all are commanded to say: Forgive us our debts. James 3: In many things we all offend. 1 John 1: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. Which testimonies are certainly clearer than to need any explanation.

Likewise the Council of Milevis testifies, canons 7 and 8, where it is defined that the just say, not only humbly but also truly, and not only for others but also for themselves: Forgive us our debts.

The same the ancient Fathers testify. Saint Cyprian, in his sermon on almsgiving: “Whoever shall say himself blameless is either proud or foolish.” Saint Gregory Nazianzen, oration 2 against Julian: “To be wholly free from all sin, God has set above the measure of human nature.” Blessed Ambrose, sermon 16 on Psalm 118: “The just man cannot deny this, that no one is without sin.” Blessed Chrysostom on Psalm 39: “Nor does the whole Church consist of the perfect, but it has also those given to idleness and sloth, etc.” Saint Jerome, Book 2 against the Pelagians: “That they are just I grant, but that they are without all sin I do not assent.” And in almost the whole of Book 3 he proves this same, where yet he admits that a man can be for some very brief time without all sin, but not for long.

Blessed Augustine, book on the Spirit and the letter, last chapter, teaches that a man can, by a singular privilege of God, live without all sin; yet that in fact there is no one who so lives, or has lived, except Christ. The same he says, book on nature and grace, chapter 36, where yet he excepts also the blessed Virgin; and letters 89 and 93, and the whole book on the perfection of justice; and finally Book 1 against the two letters of the Pelagians, chapter 14: “No one in the Church could rightly be ordained a minister, if the Apostle had said, if any be without sin, where he said, if any be without crime; or if he had said, having no sin, where he said, having no crime. For many baptized faithful are without crime, but without sin in this life I would say no one is.” Blessed Gregory, Book 21 of the Morals, chapter 9: in this life indeed many are without crime, but without sin no one can be.

The arguments on the contrary are many, but not all are to be resolved here. For those which are brought to prove that by any sin justice is lost, or that a man can live without all sin, will need no solution, since a little after we shall show that in the Church there are the best and the worst of men. Only two are proper to this place. One from Canticle 4: Thou art all fair, my beloved, and there is no spot in thee. The other from Ephesians 5: That He might present it to Himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing. Which place the Sixth Council of Toledo, chapter 1, teaches must be understood of the Catholic Church of this time; for, explaining the confession of faith, in place of that, "the holy Church," it says, "the Church without spot or wrinkle."

I answer to the first: whether that be understood of the Church by reason of one part only, that is, by reason of the just souls, or of the perfect soul, which I rather approve, that the just soul is called all fair, either by a hyperbole, which is familiar to lovers; or because the just and perfect soul lacks mortal sins, which properly leave a spot, and avoids venial ones as far as is allowed by human fragility, and if it commits any, straightway strives to blot them out. And although this is not to be immaculate simply, yet it is to be immaculate for the state of this life, as Augustine explains in his book on the perfection of justice. As also no one is perfect in this life absolutely, and yet many in the Scriptures are called perfect, because they were such for the state of this life. Genesis 6: Noe was a just and perfect man. Philippians 3: Let us, as many as are perfect, be thus minded. Nay, even those are called immaculate who without doubt do not lack venial sins. Psalm 17: And I shall be spotless with him. Psalm 118: Blessed are the undefiled in the way. Ephesians 1: He chose us in him that we should be holy and unspotted in truth.

To the second I say, first, that it can be understood of the Church, not as it now is, but as it will be after the resurrection: as expound Saint Jerome on chapter 31 of Jeremiah near the end, Saint Augustine in the book on the perfection of justice and elsewhere, and blessed Bernard in sermon 3 on the feast of All Saints. Nor does the Council of Toledo stand in the way; for although the Council understood those words of the Church of this time, yet it did not define that they must necessarily be so understood. Yet I say, secondly, that it is more probable that the Apostle speaks of the Church of this time, but attributes by synecdoche to the whole Church what befits one part. For those who are now just in the Church are glorious by the beauty of grace, which is inchoate glory; they are without spot, as was a little before explained; and they are without wrinkle, because through Baptism they are renewed, and, the old man being put off, have put on the new; for wrinkles are signs of oldness. So this passage is understood, besides the Council of Toledo already cited, by Chrysostom, Jerome, and Theophylact in their commentary.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  VIII. 

De  non  perfectis. 

Non  perfectos  in  Ecclesia,  contra  Pelagia- 
norum  et  Anabaptistarum  sententiam,  esse 
posse,  facile  probari  potest ;  nam  si  non  es¬ 
sent  in  Ecclesia  ii ,  qui  habent  aliquam  im¬ 
perfectionem,  nulla  fuisset,  neque  esset,  ne¬ 
que  futura  esset  Ecclesia  in  terris.  Nam  ex¬ 
cepto  Christo,  et  B.  Virgine,  qui  soli  non  fa¬ 
ciunt  Ecclesiam  ,  nulli  sunt,  «juamvis  sanc¬ 
tissimi  in  hac  vita  ,  qui  non  habeant  aliqua 
venialia  peccata,  qme  «tamen  non  tollunt  ju¬ 
stitiam,  nec  faciunt  hominem  Deo  inimicum, 
ut  Pelagiani  putabant.  Id  quod  testantur  in 
primis  divinee  litterae.  Psalm.  XXXI:  Tu  re¬ 
misisti  impietatem  peccati  mei ,  pro  hac  orabit 
ad  te  omnis  sanctus  in  tempore  opportuno. 
Quid  est  enim,  pro  hac  ,  nisi  pro  remissio¬ 
ne?  Et  sanctus  igitur  est  aliquis  ,  et  tamen 
habet,  quod  sibi  postulet  remitti ,  III .  Reg. 
VIII :  Nec  enim  est  homo ,  qui  non  peccet.  Pro- 
verb.  XXIV  :  Septies  in  die  cadet  justus  ,  et 
resurget.  Eccles.  VII  :  Non  est  homo  justus  in 
terra,  qui  faciat  bonum ,  et  non  peccet.  Matth. 


VI.  jubentur  omnes  dicere  :  Dimitte  nobis  de¬ 
bita  nostra.  Jacobi  III  :  In  multis  offendimus 
omnes.  I.  Joan.  I  :  Si  dixerimus ,  quia  pecca¬ 
tum  non  habemus,  nos  ipsos  seducimus ,  et  veri¬ 
tas  in  nobis  non  est  (2).  Quse  certe  testimonia 
clariora  sunt,  quam  ut  explicatione  ulla  in¬ 
digeant. 

Item  testatur  Concilium  Milevitanum,  can. 
7.  et  8.  ubi  definitur,  justos  dicere,  non  so¬ 
lum  humiliter ,  sed  etiam  veraciter ,  et  non 
solum  pro  aliis,  sed  etiam  pro  se  :  Dimitte 
nobis  debita  nostra. 

Idem  testantur  veteres  Patres,  S.  Cypria¬ 
nus  sermone  de  eleemosyna  :  «  Quisquis  se 
inculpatum  dixerit,  aut  superbus,  aut  stultus 
est.  »  S.  Gregorius  Nazianzenus  orat.  2.  in 
Julianum  :  «  Omni  prorsus  peccato  vacare, 
supra  humanae  naturae  modum  Deus  consti¬ 
tuit.  »  B.  Ambrosius  sermon.  16.  in  Psalm. 
GXVIII  :  «Non  potest,  inquit,  hoc  justus  ne¬ 
gare,  quia  nemo  sine  peccato  est.»  B.Ghry- 
sostomus  in  Psalm.  XXXIX  :  «  Nec  ex  per¬ 
fectis,  inquit,  universa  constat  Ecclesia,  sed 
habet  etiam  otio  ,  et  socordiae  deditos  etc.  » 
S.  Hieronymus  lib.  II.  contra  Pelagianos  : 

«  Justos  ,  inquit ,  esse  concedo  ,  sine  omni 
autem  peccato  esse,  non  assentior.  »  Et  lib. 
III.  fere  toto  hoc  idem  probat ,  ubi  tamen 
admittit,  posse  ad  aliquod  brevissimum  tem¬ 
pus  esse  hominem  sine  omni  peccato  ,  non 
tamen  diu. 

B.  Augustinus  lib.  de  spiritu  et  littera,  c. 
ult.  docet  posse  hominem  ex  privilegio  Dei 
singulari  vivere  sine  omni  peccato  :  tamen 
re  ipsa  neminem  esse,  qui  sic  vivat,  aut  vi¬ 
xerit,  excepto  Christo.  Idem  dicit  lib.  de  na¬ 
tura  et  gratia  ,  cap.  36.  ubi  tamen  excipit 
etiam  B.  Virginem,  et  epist.  89  et  93.  et  toto 
libro' de  perfect.  justitiae  :  ac  demum  lib.  I. 
contra  duas  epistolas  Pelagiani,  cap.  14  : 
«  Nullus  in  Ecclesia,  inquit,  recte  posset  or¬ 
dinari  minister,  si  dixisset  Apostolus,  si  quis 
sine  peccato  est,  ubidixit,  si  quis  sine  crimine 
est;  aut  si  dixisset,  peccatum  nullum  haben¬ 
tes,  ubi  dixit,  nullum  crimen  habentes.  Multi 
quippe  baptizati  fideles  sunt  sine  crimine, 
sine  peccato  autem  in  hac  vita  neminem  di¬ 
xerim.  »  B.  Gregorius  lib.  XXI.  Moralium, 
cap.  9.  et  in  hac  vita  quidem  multi  sine  cri¬ 
mine;  sine  peccato  esse  nullus  valet. 

Argumenta  in  contrarium  multa  sunt,  sed 
non  omnia  hic  solvenda,  Quse  enim  adferun- 


tt)  I.  Joan.  II.  5;  Joan.  VIII,  31.  —  (2)  Psal.  XXXI,  6;  III.  Reg.  VIII,  46;  Prov.  XXIV,  16: 
Eecl.  VII,  21 ;  Matth.  VI,  12;  Jac.  III,  2;  I.  Joan.  I,  8. 


CAPUT  IX. 


331 


tor  ad  probandum,  per  quodlibet  peccatum 
perdi  justitiam ;  vel  posse  hominem  vivere 
sine  omni  peccato,  non  egebunt  solutione, 
cum  paulo  post  ostenderimus,  inEcelesia  es¬ 
se  optimos,  et  pessimos  viros.  Duo  tantum 
sunt  propria  hujus  loci.  Unum  ex  Cant.  IV  : 
lota  pulchra  es  amica  mea ,  et  macula  non  est 
in  te.  Alterum  ex  Ephes.  V  :  Ut  exhiberet  ip¬ 
se  sibi  gloriosam  Ecclesiam  non  habentem  ma¬ 
culam  ,  aut  rugam,  aut  aliquid  hujusmodi  (i). 
Quem  locum  de  Ecclesia  Catholica  hujus 
temporis  intelligendum  esse  docet  Concilium 
Toletanum  VI,  cap.  I.  explicans  enim  con¬ 
fessionem  fidei,  loco  illius,  sanctam  Eccle¬ 
siam,  ait,  Ecclesiam  sine  macula,  aut  ruga. 

Respondeo  ad  Primum ,  sive  intelligatur 
illud  de  Ecclesia  ratione  unius  partis  tantum, 
id  est,  ratione  animarum  justarum ,  sive  de 
anima  perfecta,  quod  magis  probo,  animam 
justam  dici  totam  pulchram,  vel  per  hyper- 
bolem  ,  quae  familiaris  est  amantibus  :  vel 
quia  anima  justa,  et  perfecta  mortalibus  ca¬ 
ret  peccatis ,  quae  proprie  maculam  relin¬ 
quunt  ,  et  vitat  venialia ,  quantum  licet  per 
humanam  fragilitatem  :  et  si  qua  commit¬ 
tit,  mox  delere  studet.  Id  etsi  enim  non  est 
esse  immaculatum  simpliciter ,  est  tamen 
immaculatum  pro  statu  hujus  vitae ,  ut  Au¬ 
gustinus  explicat  libro  de  perfectione  justi¬ 
tiae.  Quomodo  etiam  nemo  est  pertectus  in 
hac  vita  absolute,  et  tamen  multi  in  Scriptu¬ 
ris  dicuntur  perfecti ,  quia  erant  tales  pro 
statu  hujus  vitae  Genes.  VI  :  Noe  vir  justus 
fuit ,  atque  perfectus.  Philip.  III  :  Quicumque 
perfecti  sumus,  hoc  sentiamus.  Imo  etiam  di¬ 
cuntur  immaculati ,  qui  sine  dubio  veniali¬ 
bus  non  carent.  Psalm.  XVII :  Et  ero  imma¬ 
culatus  cum  eo.  Psalm.  CXVIII :  Beati  imma¬ 
culati  in  via.  Ephes.  I  :  Elegit  nos  in  ipso,  ut 
essemus  sancti  et  immaculati  in  veritate  (2). 

Ad  Secundum  dico,  Primo  intelligi  posse 
de  Ecclesia,  non  ut  nunc  est,  sed  ut  erit  post 
resurrectionem  :  ut  exponunt  S.  Hierouymus 
in  cap.  31.  Hieremiae  circa  finem.  S.  Augus¬ 
tinus  lib.  de  perfect.  justit.  et  a  1  ibi  :  et  B. 
Bernardus  serm.  3.  de  festo  omnium  Sanc¬ 
torum.  Neque  obstat  Concilium  Toletanum  ; 
nam  etsi  illa  verba  intellexit  Concilium  de 
Ecclesia  hujus  temporis  ,  tamen  non  defini¬ 
vit,  sic  necessario  esse  inteliigenda  Dico  ta¬ 
men  Secundo,  probabilius  esse  quod  loqua¬ 
tur  Apostolus  de  Ecclesia  hujus  temporis, 


sed  tribuat  per  Synecdochen  toti  Ecclesiae, 
quod  uni  parti  convenit.  Qui  enim  sunt  nunc 
in  Ecclesia  justi ,  sunt  gloriosi  per  gratiae 
pulchritudinem  ,  quae  est  gloria  inchoata  : 
sunt  sine  macula  ,  ut  paulo  ante  expositum 
est,  et  sunt  sine  ruga,  quia  per  Baptismum 
renovati  sunt ,  depositoque  vetere  homine 
induerunt  novum;  rugae  enim  signa  sunt  ve¬ 
tustatis.  Ita  hunc  locum  intelligunt ,  praeter 
Concilium  Toletanum  jam  citatum,  Chrysos- 
tomus,  Hieronymus ,  et  Theophylactus  in 
commentario.
← Chapter 7Chapter 9 →