Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Church Militant · The Church Spread Throughout the Whole World

Chapter 12: That the Church Is Visible

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. II, De Ecclesia Militante, On the Church Militant (of the controversy On Councils and the Church). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

First, therefore, that the true Church is visible is proved first from all the Scriptures, wherever the name of the Church is found: for always by the name of the Church a visible congregation is signified; nor could Calvin bring forward even one place, nor did he bring one, where this name is attributed to an invisible congregation. Certainly when it is said, Numbers 20: Why have you brought out the Church of the Lord into the wilderness?, by "Church" is called that most well-known people of Israel which had gone out of Egypt. So 3 Kings 8, Scripture manifestly speaks of the visible Church, when it says: And the king turned his face and blessed all the Church of Israel; for all the Church of Israel stood. Matthew 16: Upon this rock I will build my Church. By the name of the rock, whether you understand Christ or the confession of faith, as the heretics will have it, or Peter, as we believe, always the foundation of the Church is something sensible, as is clear, and accordingly the Church itself is sensible or visible: for although now we see neither Christ nor Peter, yet then each was exposed to the bodily senses to be seen; and now each is seen, not in himself, but in his vicar or successor: as the Kingdom of Naples is not therefore invisible because the King is absent, for the King is seen in his Viceroy. Matthew 18: Tell the Church; if he will not hear the Church, etc. Certainly neither could be observed if the Church were invisible. Acts 20: Take heed to yourselves and to the whole flock, wherein the Holy Spirit hath placed you bishops to rule the Church of God. How could they rule a Church which they did not know? Acts 15: They therefore, being brought on their way by the Church, passed through Phoenice. And in the same place: When they were come to Jerusalem, they were received by the Church. And chapter 18: Paul went up and saluted the Church. How do these befit an invisible Church? 1 Corinthians 15, Galatians 1, and Philippians 3, Paul says that he persecuted the Church of God; but it is known whom he persecuted, from the Acts of the Apostles, chapter 9. Finally, 1 Timothy 3: These things I write to thee, my son Timothy, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, etc. But truly he could not behave himself in it, unless he knew which it was.

Secondly, it is proved from other Scriptures, where the Church is not named, but yet is openly described. Psalm 18: In the sun He hath set His tabernacle. Augustine expounds, treatise 2 on the epistle of John: “He hath set His Church in the open, that, as the sun cannot at all be hidden, so neither can the Church be hidden.” Likewise Isaiah 2, Daniel 2, and Micah 4, the Church is compared to a great and conspicuous mountain which can in no way be hidden, according to the common exposition of Jerome on those places, and of Augustine, treatise 1 on the epistle of John. Likewise that of Matthew 5: A city seated on a mountain cannot be hid. Augustine, book on the unity of the Church, chapter 14, and elsewhere passim, expounds it of the Church. Finally the Gospel parables of the floor, of the net, of the fold, of the feast, etc., all show that the true Church, which is the kingdom of heaven, is visible.

It is proved thirdly from the very origin and progress of the Church; for, to omit the state of the Old Testament, in which the Church was so visible that in the very flesh they bore the visible sign of circumcision, in the New Testament without doubt the whole Christian Church was in the beginning in the Apostles and disciples of Christ, who were so visible that upon them the Holy Spirit descended visibly on the day of Pentecost. Then to these were visibly added in one day men to the number of three thousand, and again to five thousand, by the confession of faith and Baptism, as is clear Acts 1, 2, 3, and 4; and thenceforth always all those, and those alone, were held of the Church of Christ who joined themselves to those first ones by Baptism and confession of faith, and departed not thence by heresies or schisms, or were not expelled by excommunication.

Fourthly, it is proved from the very nature of the Church; for the Church is a certain society, not of Angels, nor of souls, but of men. But it cannot be called a society of men unless it consist in external and visible signs; for it is not a society unless those who are called associates recognize one another, but men cannot recognize one another unless the bonds of society be external and visible. And it is confirmed from the custom of all human societies; for into the army, into the city, into the kingdom, and other like things, men are enrolled in no other way than by visible signs. Whence Augustine, Book 19 against Faustus, chapter 11: “Men cannot be coagulated into any name of religion, whether true or false, unless they be bound together by some fellowship of visible signs or Sacraments.”

Fifthly, in the time of Christ, as Philip and Illyricus will have it, the Church was only in Zacharias, Simeon, Anna, Mary, and a few other pious ones, but not in the Pontiffs and the rest of the multitude of the Jews. But it is established that Zacharias, Simeon, and the rest communicated with the Pontiffs in the temple, sacrifices, etc. For Zacharias sacrificed in the same temple; Anna departed not from that temple; Mary went every year to that temple; Christ Himself sent lepers to the Priests, and said: What they say, do ye. Therefore either those did ill in communicating with a false Church, or the Lutherans do ill in not communicating with us and not obeying the Pontiff.

Sixthly, it is proved from necessity; for we are all bound, under peril of eternal death, to join ourselves to the true Church and to persevere in it, that is, to obey its head and communicate with the rest of the members, as is clear from Cyprian on the simplicity of prelates, Jerome in letter 1 to Damasus on the name of hypostasis, and Augustine, Book 4 on Baptism, chapter 1. But this cannot be done if the Church is invisible.

Seventhly, from what was said in the preceding question; for if the Church is a congregation of men using the same Sacraments and professing the faith of Christ, under the rule of legitimate pastors, as was there proved, it necessarily follows that it is visible.

Lastly, by the testimonies of the ancients. Origen, homily 30 on Matthew: “The Church is full of splendor from the East to the West, etc.” Cyprian, book on the unity of the Church: “The Church, suffused with the light of the Lord, spreads its rays through the whole world, etc.” Chrysostom, homily 4 on chapter 6 of Isaiah: “It is easier for the sun to be extinguished than for the Church to be obscured.” Augustine, Book 3 against the letter of Parmenian, chapter 5: “There is no security of unity but from the promises of God, the Church being declared, which, seated upon a mountain, as it is said, cannot be hidden.” Treatise 1 on the epistle of John: “Do we point out the Church with the finger, my brethren? Is it not open?” And treatise 2: “What more shall I say than that they are blind who do not see so great a mountain? who against the lamp set on the candlestick close their eyes?”

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  XI!. 

Ecclesiam  esse  visibilem , 

Primum  igitur,  quod  vera  Ecclesia  sit  visi¬ 
bilis,  probatur  primo  ex  Scripturis  omnibus, 
ubicumque  invenitur  nomen  Ecclesiae  :  nam 
semper  nomine  Ecclesiae  visibilis  congrega¬ 
tio  significatur ;  nec  unum  saltem  locum 
Calvinus  proferre  potuit,  nec  protulit,  ubi 
hoc  nomen  tribueretur  congregationi  invisi¬ 
bili.  Certe  cum  dicitur  Num.  XX  :  Cur  eduxis¬ 
tis  Ecclesiam  Domini  in  solitudinem  ?  Eccle¬ 
sia  vocatur  populus  ille  notissimus  Israel, 
qui  exierat  de  TEgypto.  Sic  III.  Reg.  VIII.  de 
visibili  Ecclesia  manifeste  loquitur  Scrip¬ 
tura,  cum  dicit  :  Convertitque  Rex  faciem 
suam ,  et  benedixit  omni  Ecclesiae  Israel.  Om¬ 
nis  enim  Ecclesia  Israel  stabat.  Matth.  XVI. 
Super  hanc  petram  aedificabo  Ecclesiam 
meam  (1).  Nomine  petrae  sive  intelligas  Chris¬ 
tum  aut  fidei  confessionem,  ut  haeretici  vo¬ 
lunt,  sive  Petrum,  ut  nos  credimus,  semper 
fundamentum  Ecclesiae  est  aliquid  sensibile 
ut  patet,  ac  proinde  Ecclesia  ipsa  est  sensi¬ 
bilis,  sive  visibilis  :  nam  etsi  nunc  neque 
Christum,  neque  Petrum  videamus,  tamen 
tunc  uterque  sensibus  corporeis  expositus 
erat  ad  videndum  :  et  nunc  uterque  videtur, 
non  in  se,  sed  in  vicario,  aut  successore  suo  : 
Sicut  Regnum  Neapolitanum  non  ideo  est 
invisibile,  quia  Rex  abest,  nam  Rex  videtur 
in  suo  Prorege,  Matth.  XVIII  :  Dic  Ecclesiae , 
si  Ecclesiam  non  audierit ,  etc.  (2) 

Certe  neutrum  servari  posset,  si  esset  Ec¬ 
clesia  invisibilis,  Actor.  XX  :  Attendite  vobis 


(1)  Num.  XX,  4;  III.  Reg.  VIII,  14;  Matth.  XVI,  18.  —  (2)  Matth.  XVIII,  17, 


346 


LIBER  III. 


et  universo  gregi ,  in  quo  vos  Spiritus  sanctus 
posuit  Episcopos  regere  Ecclesiam  Dei.  Quo¬ 
modo  poterant  regere  Ecclesiam,  quam  non 
noverant?  Actor.  XV  :  Illi  quidem  deducti  ab 
Ecclesia  pertransibant  Phoenicem .  Et  ibidem : 
Cum  venissent  Hierosolymam ,  suscepti  sunt  ab 
Ecclesia.  Et  c.  XVIII  :  Ascendit  Paulus ,  et 
salutavit  Ecclesiam.  Quomodo  ista  conveniunt 
Ecclesiae  invisibili?  I.  Corinth.  XV.  Galat.  1. 
et  Philipp.  III.  Paulus  dicit,  se  persecutum 
Ecclesiam  Dei  :  at  notum  est,  quos  perse¬ 
quebatur,  ex  Actis  Apostolor.  cap.  IX.  Deni¬ 
que  I.  Timoth.  III :  Hcec  tibiscribo,  fili  Timo¬ 
thee,  ut  scias ,  quomodo  te  oporteat  conversari 
in  domo  Dei ,  quce  est  Ecclesia  Dei  vivi,  elc.  (1)  At 
sane  non  poterat  in  ea  conversari,  nisi  sciret, 
quaenam  esset. 

Secundo,  probatur  ex  aliis  Scripturis,  ubi 
non  nominatur,  sed  tamen  aperte  descri¬ 
bitur  Ecclesia,  Psalm.  XVIII :  In  Sole  posuit 
tabernaculum  suum;  exponit  Augustinus  tr. 
2.  in  epist.  Joannis  :  « In  manifesto  posuit  Ec¬ 
clesiam  suam,  ut,  sicut  Sol  non  potest  omni¬ 
no  latere,  ita  nec  Ecclesia  possit  abscondi.  » 
Item  Isaiae  II,  Daniel  II,  et  Michaeae  IV  com¬ 
paratur  Ecclesia  monti  magno  et  conspicuo, 
qui  nullo  modo  potest  latere  ,  secundum 
communem  expositionem  Hieronymi  in  ea 
loca,  et  Augustini  tract.  I.  in  epist.  Joannis. 
Item  illud  Matth.  V  :  Non  potest  civitas  abs¬ 
condi  supra  montem  posita .  Augustinus  lib. 
de  unit.  Ecclesiae,  cap.  14.  et  alibi  passim 
exponit  de  Ecclesia.  Denique  parabolae 
,  Evangelicae  de  area,  de  reti,  de  ovili,  de 
convivio  etc.  omnes  ostendunt  Ecclesiam 
veram,  quae  est  regnum  coelorum,  esse  visi¬ 
bilem. 

Probatur  tertio,  ex  ipso  ortu,  et  progressu 
Ecclesiae ;  nam,  ut  omittamus  statum  Testa¬ 
menti  veteris,  in  quo  adeo  visibilis  erat  Ec¬ 
clesia  ,  ut  iu  ipsa  carne  portarent  visibile 
signum  circumcisionis;  in  Testamento  novo 
sine  dubio  Ecclesia  Christiana  tota  erat  in 
principio  in  Apostolis  et  discipulis  Christi, 
qui  adeo  visibiles  erant,  ut  super  eos  visibi¬ 
liter  Spiritus  sanctus  descenderit  in  die  Pen¬ 
tecostes.  Deinde  istis  additi  sunt  visibiliter 
una  die  homines  ad  tria  millia,  et  rursum  ad 
quinque  millia,  per  fidei  Confessionem  et 
Baptismum,  ut  patet  Actor.  I,  II,  III  et  IV, 
ac  deinceps  semper  illi  omnes,  et  soli  habiti 
sunt  de  Ecclesia  Christi,  qui  ad  illos  primos 
se  adjunxerunt  per  Baptismum  et  Confessio¬ 


nem  fidei,  et  inde  non  recesserunt  per  hae- 
reses  aut  schismata,  vel  expulsi  non  sunt  per 
excommunicationem. 

Quarto,  probatur  ex  ipsa  ratione  Eccle¬ 
siae;  Ecclesia  enim  est  societas  quaedam,  non 
Angelorum,  neque  animarum,  sed  homi¬ 
num.  Non  autem  dici  potest  societas  homi¬ 
num,  nisi  in  externis  et  visibilibus  signis 
consistat ;  nam  non  est  societas,  nisi  se  ag¬ 
noscant  ii,  qui  dicuntur  socii,  non  autem  se 
possunt  homines  agnoscere,  nisi  societatis 
vincula  sint  externa  et  visibilia.  Et  confir¬ 
matur  ex  more  omnium  humanarum  socie¬ 
tatum;  nam  in  militiam,  in  civitatem,  in  re¬ 
gnum,  et  alia  similia  non  aliter  homines  ad- 
scribuntur,  quam  signis  visibilibus.  Unde 
Augustinus  lib.  XIX  cont.  Faustum,  cap.H  : 
«  In  nullum,  inquit,  nomen  religionis,  seu 
verum,  seu  falsum,  coagulari  homines  pos¬ 
sunt,  nisi  aliquo  signaculorum,  vel  Sacra¬ 
mentorum  visibilium  consortio  colligentur.» 

Quinto,  tempore  Christi,  ut  volunt  Philip¬ 
pus  et  Illyricus,  Ecclesia  solum  erat  in  Za- 
charia,  Simeone,  Anna,  Maria,  et  paucis 
aliis  piis,  non  autem  in  Pontificibus  et  cae- 
tera  multitudine  Judaeorum.  At  constat, 
quod  Zacharias,  Simeon,  et  caeteri  commu¬ 
nicabant  cum  Pontificibus  in  templo,  sacri¬ 
ficiis  etc.  Nam  Zacharias  in  eodem  templo 
sacrificabat.  Anna  ab  eo  templo  non  rece¬ 
debat.  Maria  ibat  singulis  annis  ad  templum 
illud.  Christus  ipse  mittebat  leprosos  ad  Sa¬ 
cerdotes,  et  dicebat  :  Quce  dicunt ,  facite.  Er¬ 
go,  vel  male  faciebant  isti  communicando 
falsae  Ecclesiae  ;  vel  male  faciunt  Lutherani 
non  communicando  nobiscum,  et  non  iObe- 
diendo  Pontifici. 

Sexto,  probatur  ex  necessitate;  nam  tene¬ 
mur  omnes  sub  periculo  aeternae  mortis  ve¬ 
rae  Ecclesiae  nos  adjungere,  et  in  illa  perse¬ 
verare,  id  est,  capiti  ejus  obedire,  et  caete- 
teris  membris  communicare,  ut  patet  ex  Cy¬ 
priano  de  simplicitate  Praelator.  Hieronymo 
in  epist.  I.  adDamasum  de  nomine  hyposta¬ 
sis,  et  Augustino  lib.  IV  de  Baptismo,  cap. 
1.  At  hoc  fieri  non  potest,  si  est  Ecclesia  in¬ 
visibilis. 

Septimo, ex  dictis  quaestione  superiore;  si 
enim  Ecclesia  est  congregatio  hominum  uten¬ 
tium  Sacramentis  iisdem,  et  fidem  Christi 
profitentium,  sub  regimine  legitimorum  pas¬ 
torum,  ut  ibi  probatum  est,  sequitur  neces¬ 
sario  eam  esse  visibilem. 


(1)  Act.  XX.  28 ;  XV,  5;  XVIII,  22;  I.  Tqn.  III,  14  et  Jb. 


CAPUT  XIII. 


347 


Ultimo,  testimoniis  veterum,  Origenes  ho- 
mil.  30.  in  Matthaeum  :  «  Ecclesia,  inquit, 
plena  est  fulgore  ab  Oriente  usque  ad  Occi¬ 
dentem  etc.  »  Cyprianus  lib.  de  unit.  Eccle¬ 
siae  :  «  Ecclesia,  inquit,  Domini  luce  perfu¬ 
sa,  radios  suos  per  orbem  terrarum  spargit, 
etc.  »  Chrysostom.  homil.  4.  in  cap.  VI  Isa. 
«Facilius  est,  inquit, Solem  extingui,  quam 
Ecclesiam  obscurari.  »  Augustinus  lib.  III 
cont.  epist.  Parmeniani,  cap.  5.  :  «  Nulla, 
inquit,  est  securitas  unitatis,  nisi  ex  promis¬ 
sis  Dei,  Ecclesia  declarata,  quae  supra  mon¬ 
tem,  ut  dictum  est,  constituta,  abscondi  non 
potest.  »  Tract.  1.  in  epist.  Joan.  :  «  Num- 
quid  digito  ostendimus  Ecclesiam,  fratres 
mei?  Nonne  aperta  est?  »  Et  Tractat.  2.  : 
«  Quid  amplius  dicturus  sum,  quam  caecos, 
qui  tam  magnum  montem  non  vident?  Qui 
contra  lucernam,  in  candelabro  positam, 
oculos  claudunt?  »
← Chapter 11Chapter 13 →