Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Church Militant · The Church Spread Throughout the Whole World

Chapter 14: That the Church Cannot Err

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. II, De Ecclesia Militante, On the Church Militant (of the controversy On Councils and the Church). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

It remains that we prove that the Church cannot err in any way, even without apostatizing from God. But first the opinion of the adversaries and our own must be explained a little more diligently.

Calvin, therefore, says that this proposition, “the Church cannot err,” is true if it be understood with a twofold restriction. The first is, if the Church propose no dogmas outside Scripture, that is, if it reject unwritten traditions and only propose faithfully what is had in the Scriptures. But if you ask whether we are certain that the Church will always propose faithfully what is in the Scriptures, he answers that the Church always proposes faithfully what is had in the Scriptures in things necessary to salvation, yet not in others, and accordingly there always remain in the Church some blemishes of errors.

The second restriction is that that, “the Church cannot err,” be understood of the universal Church alone, and not extended to the Bishops, who are the Church representatively, as our writers say; for each Bishop bears the person of his particular Church, and accordingly all the Bishops bear the person of the whole Church. So Calvin has, Book 4, chapter 8, § 11, 12, 14, 15, of the greater Institutes, and in the smaller Institutes chapter 8, § 146, 148, 149, and 150, where, however, lyingly and fraudulently explaining our opinion, he says that we assert that the Church cannot err, whether it use the word of God or not; when yet he himself is not ignorant that we speak not of the word of God absolutely, but only of the written word, and say that the Church cannot err, whether it propose what is had in the Scriptures, or dogmas outside Scripture.

Our opinion, therefore, is that the Church absolutely cannot err, neither in things absolutely necessary, nor in others which it proposes to us to be believed or done, whether they be had expressly in the Scriptures or not. And when we say that the Church cannot err, we understand this both of the whole body of the faithful and of the whole body of the Bishops, so that the sense of that proposition, the Church cannot err, is: that which all the faithful hold as of faith is necessarily true and of faith; and likewise that which all the Bishops teach as pertaining to the faith is necessarily true and of faith.

These things being explained, this truth is proved. First, of the whole Church as it contains all the faithful, and first from that of 1 Timothy 3: The Church of God is the pillar and ground of truth. Calvin answers that the Church is called the pillar and ground of truth because it preserves, as a most faithful custodian, the preaching of the written word of God, not because it can err in nothing.

But on the contrary, for first, in this way the shops of the booksellers would be pillars of truth, which most diligently guard all the Scriptures. Then the Apostle makes no mention here of the Scriptures, but simply says that the Church is the pillar and ground of truth. Moreover, it is much more to be a pillar than a simple custodian; for on a pillar the house rests, and, it being removed, it falls. So therefore the Apostle, calling the Church the pillar of truth, wishes to signify that the truth of faith, as regards us, rests on the authority of the Church, and that whatever the Church approves is true, whatever it disapproves is false. Add that the Church was a pillar even when there were no Scriptures, from which it follows that it is not called a pillar on account of the custody of the Scriptures. Finally, if it were a question of custody, Paul would better have compared the Church to a chest than to a pillar; for not pillars, but chests, keep books.

Moreover, secondly, the Church is governed by Christ as by its head and spouse, and by the Holy Spirit as by its soul, as is clear Ephesians 1: Him He gave to be head over all the Church, which is His body. And Ephesians 4: One body and one Spirit. Ephesians 5: The husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the Church. Therefore if the Church erred in the dogmas of faith or morals, error would be attributed to Christ and the Holy Spirit. Wherefore John 16 the Lord says: The Spirit of truth will teach you all truth.

Calvin answered that Christ and the Holy Spirit teach the Church all truth simply necessary, yet always leave some blemish. Nor does it follow that error is therefore attributed to Christ or the Holy Spirit, just as ignorance is not attributed to them, which without doubt is in some measure in the Church.

I answer that, just as a husband, who is the head of the wife, is not bound to remove from the wife all ignorance, yet is bound to remove every error from which some great evil arises, though the wife be excused by ignorance: so also Christ is bound to remove from the Church every error from which a great evil arises; but such is every error concerning the faith. For it is a great evil that the Church worship God with a false faith, since divine worship consists chiefly in Faith, Hope, and Charity, as Augustine teaches in the Enchiridion, chapter 3.

Thirdly, we are bound under the penalty of anathema to believe the Church in all things, as is clear Matthew 18: But if he will not hear the Church, let him be to thee as the heathen and the publican. And all Councils say anathema to those who do not assent to the decrees of the Church. But it would be iniquitous to be bound under so grave a penalty to assent to uncertain and sometimes false things.

Calvin answers that Christ therefore commanded that we hear the Church, because He knew that the Church would teach nothing outside the written word of God. But on the contrary, for, to omit the very many things which we said in the disputation on traditions: the true Church teaches that the epistle to the Romans is the word of God, that the epistle to the Laodiceans is not the word of God; and the same can be said of the Gospel of Mark and of Nicodemus, and the like, which are nowhere written; not therefore is it true that the Church teaches nothing outside the written word of God.

Fourthly, that the Church is holy the Apostles' Creed teaches; but this holiness consists properly in the profession of dogmas; therefore the Christian profession contains nothing but what is holy, that is, true as to the doctrine of faith, and just as to the precepts of morals. And in this it really excels all the professions of philosophers, heathens, Jews, heretics: for all have some false dogmas mingled with the true.

Fifthly, if the opinion of Calvin were true, the greatest part of the dogmas of faith could be called into doubt; for there are many things of faith which are not absolutely necessary to salvation. Indeed, to believe the histories of the Old Testament, or that the Gospels of Mark and Luke are canonical writings, nay that there are any divine Scriptures at all, is not altogether necessary to salvation; for without this faith many were saved before the Scriptures were written, and afterward in the time of the New Testament many barbarous nations, of whom Irenaeus writes, Book 3, chapter 4. But this is most absurd, nor would Calvin in any way admit that it could be doubted of the Scriptures; not therefore is it true that only in things necessary to salvation the Church cannot err.

It is proved lastly from the Fathers, who, as we showed above in the question on the judge of controversies, all appeal to the Church in any questions of faith whatsoever; which certainly they would in no way do if they thought the Church could be deceived. Tertullian, book on prescription: “Come now,” he says, “let all the Churches have erred, let the Holy Spirit have regarded none.” Augustine, Book 1 against Cresconius, chapter 33: “The truth of the Scriptures is held by us, when we do that which has now pleased the whole Church, which the authority of the very Scriptures commends; so that, since holy Scripture cannot deceive, whoever fears to be deceived by the obscurity of this question, let him consult about it the Church, which holy Scripture demonstrates without any ambiguity.” And letter 118: he says that to dispute against that which the whole Church holds is of the most insolent madness.

Now that also the Church representatively cannot err is proved first, because if all the Bishops erred, the whole Church too would err, since the peoples are bound to follow their Pastors, the Lord saying, Luke 10: He that heareth you, heareth me, and Matthew 23: Whatsoever they shall say, do ye. Secondly, from the letter of the Council of Ephesus to Nestorius, where Nestorius, if he wished to satisfy the Church, is compelled to confirm by oath that he thinks as the Bishops of the East and West think. Likewise from Augustine, Book 1 on Baptism, chapter 18, who calls the decree of a general Council the consent of the whole Church: and deservedly, for the Church teaches and decrees nothing except through its Pastors, as any body through its head. Whence also 3 Kings 8 the congregation of Priests and Elders is called all the Church of Israel. And Chrysostom expounds that of Matthew 18: Tell the Church, that is, the Prelate. But of these more in the matter on Councils.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  XIV. 

Ecclesiam  non  posse  errare. 

Superest  ut  probemus.  Ecclesiam  non 
posse  errare  ullo  modo,  etiam  non  aposta- 
tando  a  Deo.  Est  tamen  prius  paulo  diligen¬ 
tius  explicanda  sententia  adversariorum,  et 
nostra. 

Calvinus  igitur  dicit,  istam  propositionem : 
«  Ecclesia  non  potest  errare,  »  esse  veram, 
si  intelligatur  cum  duplici  restrictione.  Pri¬ 
ma  est,  si  Ecclesia  non  proponat  dogmata 
extra  Scripturam,  id  est,  si  rejiciat  traditio¬ 
nes  non  scriptas,  et  solum  proponat  fideliter 
quse  habentur  in  Scripturis.  Si  autem  quae- 
ras,  an  certi  simus,  quod  Ecclesia  proponet 
semper  fideliter,  quse  sunt  in  Scripturis  : 
Respondet,  Ecclesiam  semper  proponere  fide¬ 
liter,  quse  habentur  in  Scripturis,  in  rebus 
necessariis  ad  salutem,  non  tamen  in  aliis, 
ac  proinde  semper  remanere  in  Ecclesia  nae¬ 
vos  aliquos  errorum. 

Secunda  restrictio  esfc,  ut  illud  :  «  Eccle¬ 
sia  non  potest  errare,  »  intelligatur  de  sola 
Ecclesia  universali,  non  autem  extendatur 
ad  Episcopos,  qui  sunt  Ecclesia  reprsesenta- 
tive,  ut  nostri  loquuntur;  Quilibet  enim  Epis¬ 
copus  gerit  personam  suae  Ecclesiae  particu¬ 
laris,  et  proinde  omnes  Episcopi  gerunt  per¬ 
sonam  totius  Ecclesiae;  ita  habet  Calvinus 
lib.  IV,  c.  8,  §  11,  12,  14,  15,  majoris  insti¬ 
tutionis,  et  in  minori  institutione  cap.  8, 
§.  146,  148,  149,  et  150,  ubi  tamen  menda¬ 
citer  et  fraudulenter  explicans  sententiam 
nostram,  dicit,  nos  asserere,  Ecclesiam  non 
posse  errare,  sive  utatur  verbo  Dei,  sive  non ; 
cum  tamen  ipse  non  ignoret,  nos  non  loqui 
de  verbo  Dei  absolute,  sed  tantum  de  verbo 
scripto,  ac  dicere,  Ecclesiam  non  posse 
errare,  sive  proponat,  quae  habentur  in 
Scripturis,  sive  dogmata  extra  Scripturam. 

Nostra  igitur  sententia  est,  Ecclesiam  ab¬ 
solute  non  posse  errare,  nec  in  rebus  ab¬ 
solute  necessariis,  nec  in  aliis,  quae,  cre¬ 
denda,  vel  facienda  nobis  proponit,  sive 
habeantur  expresse  in  Scripturis,  sive  non. 
Et  cum  dicimus,  Ecclesiam  non  posse  errare, 


(1)  Rom.X,  10;  Matth.  X,  33. 


350 


LIBER  III. 


id  intelligimus  tam  de  universitate  fidelium, 
quam  de  universitate  Episcoporum,  ita  ut 
sensus  sit  ejus  propositionis,  Ecclesia  non 
potest  errare,  id  est,  id  quod  tenent  omnes 
fideles  tanquam  de  fide,  necessario  est  verum 
et  de  fide;  et  similiter  id,  quod  docent  om¬ 
nes  Episcopi,  tanquam  ad  fidem  pertinens, 
necessario  est  verum  et  de  fide. 

His  explicatis,  probatur  haec  veritas.  Pri¬ 
mo,  de  Ecclesia  universa,  ut  continet  omnes 
fideles,  ac  primum  ex  illo  I.  Timoth.  III  ; 
Ecclesia  Dei  est  columna  et  firmamentum  veri¬ 
tatis (1).  Respondet  Calvinus,  Ecclesiam  dici 
columnam  et  firmamentum  veritatis,  quia 
conservat  tanquam  fidissima  custos  praedica¬ 
tionem  verbi  Dei  scripti,  non  quod  in  nulla 
re  errare  possit. 

At  contra,  nam  in  primis  lioc  modo  offi¬ 
cinae  librariorum  essent  columnae  veritatis, 
quae  diligentissime  custodiunt  omnes  Scrip¬ 
turas.  Deinde  Apostolus  non  meminit  hic 
Scripturarum ;  sed  simpliciter  dicit,  Eccle¬ 
siam  esse  columnam  et  firmamentum  verita¬ 
tis.  Praeterea,  multo  amplius  est,  esse  colum¬ 
nam,  quam  simplicem  custodem ;  nam  co¬ 
lumnae  innititur  domus,  et  ea  remota,  cadit. 
Sic  igitur  Apostolus  vocans  Ecclesiam  colum¬ 
nam  veritatis,  vult  significare  veritatem 
fidei,  quoad  nos  niti  Ecclesiae  auctoritate,  et 
verum  esse  quidquid  Ecclesia  probat,  fal¬ 
sum  quidquid  illa  improbat.  Adde,  quod 
etiam  Ecclesia  fuit  columna,  quando  non 
erant  Scripturae,  ex  quo  sequitur,  non  dici 
columnam  propter  custodiam  Scripturarum. 
Denique,  si  de  custodia  ageretur,  melius 
arcae,  quam  columnae  Paulus  comparasset 
Ecclesiam ;  nec  enim  columnae,  sed  arcae 
libros  custodiunt. 

Praeterea  secundo,  Ecclesia  gubernatur  a 
Christo,  tanquam  a  capite  sponso  suo,  et  a 
Spiritu  sancto,  tanquam  ab  anima,  ut  patet 
Ephes.  I  :  Ipsum  dedit  caput  super  omnem  Ec¬ 
clesiam,  quce  est  corpus  ipsius.  Et  Ephes.  IV  : 
Unum  corpus ,  et  unus  Spiritus ;  Ephes.  Y  : 
Vir  caput  est  mulieris ,  sicut  Christus  caput  Ec¬ 
clesiae  (3).  Ergo  si  Ecclesia  in  dogmatibus 
fidei,  vel  morum  erraret,  Christo  et  Spiritui 
sancto  error  tribueretur.  Quocirca  Joan.  XVI 
Dominus  ait  :  Spiritus  veritatis  docebit  vos 
omnem  veritatem.  (4) 

Respondit  Calvinus,  Christum  et  Spiritum 
sanctum  docere  Ecclesiam  omnem  veritatem 
simpliciter  necessariam,  semper  tamen  relin¬ 


quere  aliquem  naevum.  Neque  sequitur,  tri¬ 
bui  propterea  Christo,  aut  Spiritui  sancto 
errorem,  sicut  eis  non  tribuitur  ignorantia, 
quse  sine  dubio  aliqua  est  in  Ecclesia. 

Respondeo,  sicut  vir,  qui  est  caput  mulie¬ 
ris,  non  tenetur  removere  ab  uxore  omnem 
ignorantiam,  tenetur  tamen  removere  om¬ 
nem  errorem,  ex  quo  magnum  aliquod  ma¬ 
lum  oriatur,  licet  uxor  excusetur  per  igno¬ 
rantiam  ;  ita  etiam  Christus  tenetur  remo¬ 
vere  omnem  errorem  ab  Ecclesia,  ex  quo 
magnum  oritur  malum,  talis  autem  est  om¬ 
nis  error  circa  fidem.  Nam  magnum  est  ma¬ 
lum,  quod  Ecclesia  falsa  fide  Deum  colat, 
cum  praecipue  cultus  divinus  in  Fide,  Spe, 
et  Charitate  consistat,  ut  Augustinus  docet 
in  Enchiridio,  cap.  3. 

Tertio,  obligamur  sub  anathematis  pcena, 
credere  Ecclesiae  in  omnibus,  ut  patet 
Matth.  XVIII  :  «  Quod  si  Ecclesiam  non  audie¬ 
rit,  sit  tibi  velut  Ethnicus  et  Publicanus  (5)  : 
et  Concilia  omnia  dicunt  anathema  non  as- 
sentientibus  Ecclesiae  decretis  :  At  iniquum 
esset,  sub  tam  gravi  pcena  obligari  ad  assen- 
tiendum  rebus  incertis,  et  interdum  falsis. 

Respondet  Calvinus,  ideo  Christum  j us¬ 
sisse,  ut  Ecclesiam  audiremus,  quia  sciebat, 
Ecclesiam  nihil  docturam  extra  verbum  Dei 
scriptum.  At  contra,  nam,  ut  omittam  plu¬ 
rima,  quae  diximus  in  disputatione  de  tradi¬ 
tionibus  :  vera  Ecclesia  docet,  epistolam  ad 
Romanos  esse  verbum  Dei,  epistolam  ad 
Laodicenos  non  esse  verbum  Dei;  et  idem 
de  Evangelio  Marci  et  Nicodemi,  et  simili¬ 
bus  dici  potest,  quae  nusquam  scripta  sunt, 
non  igitur  est  verum,  Ecclesiam  nihil  docere 
extra  verbum  Dei  scriptum. 

Quarto,  Ecclesiam  esse  sanctam,  docet 
Symbolum  Apostolorum,  ista  autem  sancti¬ 
tas  proprie  in  professione  dogmatum  consis¬ 
tit,  ergo  Christiana  professio  nihil  continet, 
nisi  sanctum,  id  est,  verum,  quoad  fidei  doc¬ 
trinam,  et  justum,  quoad  praecepta  morum. 
Et  in  hoc  revera  excellit  omnibus  professio¬ 
nibus  Philosophorum,  Ethnicorum,  Judaeo¬ 
rum,  Haereticorum  :  Omnes  enim  habent 
dogmata  aliqua  falsa  admista  veris. 

Quinto,  si  esset  vera  Calvini  sententia, 
maxima  pars  dogmatum  fidei  in  dubium 
revocari  posset;  nam  multa  sunt  de  fide, 
quae  non  sunt  absollite  necessaria  ad  salu¬ 
tem.  Sane  credere  historias  Testamenti  vete¬ 
ris,  vel  Evangelia  Marci  et  Lucae  esse  cano- 


(1)  I.  Tim.  III.  15.  -  (2)  Eph.  I,  22;  IV,  4;  V,  23;  -  (3)  Joan.  XVI,  13.  —  (4)  Matth.  XVIII;  17! 


CAPUT  XV. 


351 


nica  scripta,  imo  ullas  esse  divinas  Scriptu¬ 
ras,  non  est  omnino  necessarium  ad  salu¬ 
tem  ;  nam  sine  hac  fide  multi  salvati  sunt, 
antequam  Scriptura}  scriberentur,  et  postea 
tempore  novi  Testamenti,  multae  barbarae 
nationes;  de  quibus  scribit  Irenaeus  lib.  III, 
cap.  4.  At  hoc  est  absurdissimum,  nec  ullo 
modo  admitteret  Calvinus  posse  dubitari  de 
Scripturis  ;  non  igitur  verum  est,  solum  in 
rebus  necessariis  ad  salutem,  Ecclesiam  non 
posse  errare. 

Probatur  ultimo  ex  Patribus,  qui,  ut  supra 
ostendimus,  in  quaestione  de  judice  contro¬ 
versiarum,  omnes  ad  Ecclesiam  provocant 
in  quaestionibus  fidei  quibuscumque  ;  quod 
certe  nullo  modo  facerent,  si  Ecclesiam  falli 
posse  existimarent,  Tertullianus  libro  de 
praescript.  :  «  Age,  inquit,  omnes  Ecclesiae 
erraverint,  nullam  respexerit  Spiritus  sanc¬ 
tus.  »  Augustinus  lib.  I.  contra  Cresconium, 
cap.  33  :  «  Scripturarum  a  nobis  tenetur 
veritas,  cum  id  facimus,  quod  universae  jam 
placuit  Ecclesiae,  quam  ipsarum  Scriptura¬ 
rum  commendat  auctoritas,  ut  quoniam 
sancta  Scriptura  fallere  non  potest,  quisquis 
falli  metuit  hujus  obscuritate  quaestionis, 
Ecclesiam  de  illa  consulat,  quam  sine  ulla 
ambiguitate  sancta  Scriptura  demonstrat.  » 
EtEpist.  118  :  «  Disputare  contra  id,  quod 
universa  Ecclesia  sentit,  insolentissimae  in¬ 
saniae  esse  dicit.  » 

Jam  quod  etiam  Ecclesia  repraesentative 
non  possit  errare,  probatur  primo,  quia  si 
omnes  Episcopi  errarent,  tota  etiam  Ecclesia 
erraret,  quia  tenentur  populi  sequi  suos  Pas¬ 
tores,  dicente  Domino  Lucae  X  :  Qui  vos  au¬ 
dit,  me  audit ,  et  Matth.  XXIII  :  Quacumque 
dixerint ,  facite  (i).  Secundo,  ex  epistola  Con¬ 
cilii  Ephesini  ad  Nestorium,  ubi  cogitur 
Nestorius,  si  Ecclesiae  satisfacere  velit,  jura¬ 
mento  confirmare,  se  ita  sentire,  ut  sentiunt 
Orientis  et  Occidentis  Episcopi.  Item  ex  Au¬ 
gustino  lib.  I.  de  Baptismo  cap.  18.  vocat  de¬ 
cretum  Concilii  generalis,  Ecclesiae  univer¬ 
sae  consensum  :  et  merito,  nam  Ecclesia  non 
docet  nec  decernit  quidquam,  nisi  per  suos 
Pastores,  sicut  quodlibet  corpus  per  suum 
caput.  Unde  etiam  III.  Reg.  VIII.  congre¬ 
gatio  Sacerdotum  et  Seniorum  vocatur  om¬ 
nis  Ecclesia  Israel.  Et  Chrysostomus  exponit 
illud  Matth.  XVIII :  Dic  Ecclesia ,  id  est,  Prce- 
lato.  Sed  de  his  plura  in  materia  de  Conciliis.
← Chapter 13Chapter 15 →