Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Sacrament of the Eucharist · Book II: On the Real Presence, from the Testimonies of the Fathers

Chapter 1: The Testimony of the Disciples of St. Andrew the Apostle (First Age of the Church)

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. IV, De Sacramento Eucharistiae, Book II: On the Truth of the Body of the Lord in the Eucharist, from the Testimonies of the Fathers. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

The First Age of the Church, from the year of the Lord [1] to 100.

First, then, the testimonies of those must be examined who saw and heard the Apostles, which was the first age of the Church. And first there occurs the book of the passion of Saint Andrew the Apostle, written by his disciples, who were present at the passion. That this book is genuine is sufficiently established: both because none (so far as I know) have hitherto called its authority into question; and because in truth it contains nothing that smacks of novelty; and because the manner of Saint Andrew’s passion, and those words of his, “Hail, holy cross,” most celebrated in the whole Church, were without doubt taken from this book; and because Peter Damian, in his second sermon on Saint Andrew, speaks thus of this history: “Not without merit has it been received into the singular citadel of authority, since those who saw it wrote it for the world, and were ministers of the word”; and finally because John of Louvain, in his censure on the passions of the saints, which is had in the Martyrology of Molanus, judges this book to be read by all means; and the same was indicated by that most weighty man Aloysius Lipomanus, who described the lives of the Saints from approved authors; to omit that in the Roman Breviary, lately revised and purged, the passion of Saint Andrew from this book has its place.

In that book, then, are had these words of the Apostle Andrew: “I daily sacrifice to almighty God an immaculate lamb.” And below: “Who, although He be truly sacrificed, and His flesh truly eaten by the people, yet remains whole and living.” In which words, that phrase (truly eaten) excludes an eating in a sign or spirit alone. And besides, a little below, when Aegeas marveled and asked that it be explained to him how it could be that a lamb truly eaten remained whole and living, and Saint Andrew refused to explain the mystery to a heathen man, and the other insisted and wished to compel the Apostle by torments, at length the Apostle subjoined that it could in no way come about that, without faith in Christ, one should attain the knowledge of this mystery. But certainly, if the Eucharist is nothing but bread signifying Christ, it was not difficult, even without faith, to understand how Christ, eaten in a sign, remains whole. For if the image of some prince be imprinted on bread, certainly that prince can be eaten in his image without any injury to himself; nor is there any difficulty in understanding this. To this passage I have seen no answer of the heretics.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  PRIMUM. 

PRIMA  JETAS  ECCLESIAS  AB  ANNO  DOMINI 
USQUE  AD  100. 

Testimonium  discipulorum  S.  Andre x 
Apostoli. 

Primo  igitur  excutienda  sunt  testimonia 
eorum,  qui  Apostolos  viderunt,  et  audierunt, 
qute  fuit  prima  retas  Ecclesire.  Ac  primum 
occurrit  liber  passionis  S.  Andrese  Apostoli 
scriptus  ab  ejus  discipulis,  qui  passioni  inter¬ 
fuerunt.  Hunc  librum  legitimum  esse  satis 
constat;  tum,  quia  nulli  (quod  sciam)  adhuc 
in  qusestionem  ejus  auctoritatem  vocarunt  ; 
tum,  quia  revera  nihil  continet,  quod  novi¬ 
tatem  redoleat ;  tum,  quia  genus  passionis 
S.  Andrern,  et  illa  ejus  verba  :  «  Salve  sancta 
crux»,  in  tota  Ecclesia  celeberrima,  ex  hoc 
libro  sine  dubitatione  sumpta  sunt  :  tum  quia 
Petrus  Damianus  in  serm.  2.  de  S.  Andrea 
de  hac  historia  sic  loquitur.  Non  immerito  in 
singularem  auctoritatis  arcem  suscepta  est, 
quam  qui  viderunt,  scripserunt  orbi,  et  mi¬ 
nistri  fuere  sermonis  :  tum  denique,  quia 
Joannes  a  Lovanio  in  sua  censura  de  passio¬ 
nibus  sanctorum,  quie  habetur  in  Martyrolo- 
gio  Molani,  hunc  librum  omnibus  modis  le¬ 
gendum  censet;  et  idem  indicavit  vir  gravis¬ 
simus  Aloysius  Lipomannus,  qui  ex  probatis 
auctoribus  vitas  Sanctorum  descripsit ;  ut 
omittam  quod  in  Breviario  Romano,  nuper 
recognito,  ac  repurgato,  suum  locum  habet 
passio  S.  Andrern  ex  hoc  libro. 

In  eo  igitur  libro  habentur  bsec  verba 
Apostoli  Andrcte  :  «  Ego  omnipotenti  Deo 
immaculatum  agnum  quotidie  sacrifico  ».  Et 
infra  :  «  Qui  cum  sit  vere  sacrificatus,  et 
vere  a  populo  carnes  ejus  manducatm,  inte¬ 
ger  perseverat,  et  vivus  » .  In  quibus  verbis, 
illud  ( Vere  manducatx )  excludit  manducatio¬ 
nem  in  solo  signo  aut  spiritu.  Ac  prieterea 
paulo  infra,  cum  /Egeas  miraretur,  ac  pete¬ 


ret,  sibi  explicari,  quomodo  posset  fieri,  ut 
agnus  vere  manducatus,  integer  et  vivus 
maneret,  et  S.  Andreas  recusaret  homini 
ethnico  mysterium  explicare,  et  ille  instaret, 
ac  per  tormenta  cogere  vellet  Apostolum ; 
tandem  Apostolus  subjunxit,  fieri  non  posse 
ullo  modo,  ut  sine  fide  in  Christum,  ad  hujus 
mysterii  notitiam  perveniret.  At  certe  si  ni¬ 
hil  est  Eucharistia,  nisi  panis  significans 
Christum,  non  erat  difficile  etiam  sine  fide 
intelligere,  quomodo  Christus  in  signo  man¬ 
ducatus,  integer  perseveret.  Nam  si  in  pane 
imprimatur  imago  principis  alicujus ;  certe 
sine  ulla  sua  la3sione,  comedi  poterit  princeps 
ille  in  sua  imagine  ;  nec  ulla  difficultas  est  in 
hac  re  intclligenda.  Ad  hunc  locum  non  vidi 
ullam  responsionem  haereticorum.
← The Bellarmine TranslationChapter 2 →