Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Sacrament of the Eucharist · Book II: On the Real Presence, from the Testimonies of the Fathers

Chapter 17: The Testimony of Blessed Optatus of Milevis

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. IV, De Sacramento Eucharistiae, Book II: On the Truth of the Body of the Lord in the Eucharist, from the Testimonies of the Fathers. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

Optatus of Milevis flourished at the same time as Ambrose and Basil, as is clear from Book 2 against Parmenian, where he writes that he lived in the time of Pope Siricius, who had succeeded Damasus. He, then, in Book 6 against Parmenian, says thus: “For what is so sacrilegious as to break, scrape, remove the altars of God, on which sometimes you too have offered? On which the vows of the people and the members of Christ were borne; whither almighty God was invoked; whither, being asked, the Holy Spirit descended; whence a pledge of eternal salvation, and the safeguard of faith, and the hope of resurrection was received by many.” And below: “What is the altar but the seat of the body and blood of Christ?” And below: “How had Christ offended you, whose body and blood dwelt there through certain moments?” And below: “Yet this monstrous crime was doubled, when you broke also the chalices, bearers of the blood of Christ.” So he.

Now that by the body of Christ, which Optatus so often repeats was wont to remain on the altar, is understood not the body significatively, but truly—that is, not the bread alone, which represents the body of Christ, but the very true and properly-so-called body—can be proved in many ways from this very passage. First, from this, that although he so often repeats it, he never once said that a sign of the body remains or is offered on the altar, but perpetually the body of Christ, or the members of Christ.

Secondly, from this, that he says that almighty God is invoked over the altar, and that the Holy Spirit descends over the same altar; which without doubt must be referred to the consecration; for we see in all the ancient liturgies that the Holy Spirit is invoked to descend and transmute the bread into the body of Christ; nor can another reason be rendered of this descent of the Holy Spirit than for the confecting of the Sacrament. But to what purpose this descent, to what purpose the invocation of the Almighty, if nothing marvelous and supernatural had to be done?

Thirdly, from this, that Optatus calls the Eucharist a pledge of salvation, the safeguard of faith, and the hope of resurrection; for he alludes to that which the ancients—Irenaeus, Hilary, Cyril, Nyssen, and others—are wont to say, that the body of Christ is joined with our body that from it it may draw a certain power to attain blessed immortality.

Fourthly, from this, that he says the body of Christ dwells on the altar through certain moments. For if he spoke of a sign of the body, he would not say “through certain moments,” but always; for the cross is wont to remain always on the altar, as Chrysostom testifies in his oration That Christ is God; nay even (as he there says) on the roofs, on the walls, on the vessels, and so forth. But the cross is a sign of Christ crucified; and the altar itself too is a certain figure and sign of Christ, as Peter Martyr confesses in his book against Gardiner, objection 38. In another manner, then, than by signification, the Eucharist is the body of Christ.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  XVII. 

Testimonium  Beati  Optati  Mileoitani. 

Optatus  Milevitanus  floruit  eodem  tempore, 
<[uo  Ambrosius,  et  Basilius,  ut  patet  ex  lib. 
ii  .contra  Parmenianum ,  ubi  scribit  se  vixisse 
tempore  Siricii  papa},  qui  Damaso  succes¬ 
serat.  Is  igitur  in  vi  lil).  contra  Parmenianum, 
sic  ait  :  «  Quid  enim  est  tam  sacrilegum, 
quam  altaria  Dei,  in  quibus  aliquando  et  vos 
obtulistis,  frangere,  radere,  removere  ?  in 
quibus  vota  populi,  et  membra  Christi  por¬ 
tata  sunt  :  quo  Deus  omnipotens  invocatus 
sit,  quo  postulatus  descendit  Spiritus  sanctus, 
unde  e  multis  pignus  salutis  seterncC,  et  tutela 
fidei,  et  spes  resurrectionis  accepta  est  ».  Et 
infra  :  «  Quid  est  altare,  nisi  sedes  corporis 
et  sanguinis  Christi  »  ?  Et  infra  :  «  Quid  vos 
offenderat  Christus  ,  cujus  illic  per  certa 
momenta  corpus,  et  sanguis  habitabat  »  ?  Et 
infra  :  «  Hoc  tamen  immane  facinus  gemi¬ 
natum  est  dum  fregistis  etiam  calices  Christi 
sanguinis  portatores».  IIa3C  ille. 

Quod  autem  per  corpus  Christi,  quod  tam 
soepe  repetit  Optatus  in  altari  manere  soli¬ 
tum,  non  intelligatur  corpus  significative, 
sed  vere,  id  est,  non  solus  panis,  qui  Christi 
corpus  repraesentet,  sed  ipsum  verum ,  et 
proprie  dictum  corpus,  multis  modis  probari 
potest  ex  hoc  ipso  loco.  Primo  ex  eo,  quod 
cum  toties  id  repetat,  ne  semel  quidem  dixe¬ 
rit,  signum  corporis  in  altari  manere,  vel 
offerri ,  sed  perpetuo  corpus  Christi  ,  aut 
membra  Christi. 

Secundo,  exeo,  quod  dicit,  invocari  super 
altare  Deum  omnipotentem,  et  descendere 
super  idem  altare  Spiritum  sanctum,  quod 
sine  dubio  referendum  est  ad  consecratio¬ 
nem  :  videmus  enim  in  omnibus  liturgiis 
antiquis  invocari  Spiritum  sanctum,  ut  de¬ 
scendat  ,  et  transmutet  panem  in  corpus 
Christi;  neque  potest  reddi  alia  ratio  hujus 
descensus  spiritus  sancti,  nisi  ad  Sacramen¬ 
tum  conficiendum.  At  quorsum  iste  descen¬ 
sus,  quorsum  invocatio  omnipotentis,  si  nihil 
mirabile,  et  supernaturJc  fieri  deberet. 

Tertio  ex  eo,  quod  Eucharistiam  vocat 
Optatus,  pignus  salutis,  tutelam  fidei,  et  spem 
resurre  ctionis  :  alludit  enim  ad  id,  quot  ve¬ 
teres,  i  ren  reus,  Hilarius,  Cyrillus,  Nyssenus, 
et  alii  dicere  solent,  ideo  conjungi  cum  cor¬ 


pore  nostro  corpus  Christi  ut  ex  illo  trahat 
vim  quamdam  ad  beatam  immortalitatem 
assequendam. 

Quarto  ex  eo,  quod  dicit  per  certa  mo¬ 
menta  habitare  corpus  Christi  in  altari.  Si 
enim  loqueretur  de  signo  corporis,  non  di¬ 
ceret  :  «  Per  certa  momenta  »,  sed  semper; 
semper  enim  in  altari  manere  solet  crux,  ut 
Chrysostomus  testatur  in  orat,  quod  Christus 
sit  Deus;  imo  etiam  (ut  ipse  ibidem  ait)  in 
culminibus,  in  parietibus,  in  vasis  etc.  Crux 
autem  signum  est  Christi  crucifixi ;  et  ipsum 
etiam  altera  figura  queedam  est,  et  signum 
Christi,  ut  fatetur  Petrus  Martyr  libro  contra 
Gardin.  objecto  38.  alio  igitur  modo  quam 
per  significationem  ,  Eucharistia  corpus 
Christi  est.
← Chapter 16Chapter 18 →