Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Sacrament of the Eucharist · Book V: On the Sacrifice of the Mass (First)

Chapter 3: That the Death of Christ Is a Sacrifice Properly So Called

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. IV, De Sacramento Eucharistiae, Book V: On the Sacrifice of the Mass (First Book). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

But one doubt occurs concerning the definition of sacrifice. For the sacrifice of the cross, that is, the Passion and death of Christ, was a most true and most perfect sacrifice, as Augustine teaches, Book 1 against the adversary of the law and the prophets, chapter 18; and yet the definition assigned does not seem to fit it. For (to omit other things) the nature of a sacrifice described by us requires that it be not the action of any virtue except religion: but the death of Christ was an action of charity, patience, fortitude, humility, obedience, as the Apostle proclaims, Romans 5, Philippians 2, Hebrews 12, and elsewhere.

I answer: The sacrifice of the cross was properly an act of religion. For Christ chiefly offered Himself to death that He might be an oblation and sacrifice to God for the expiation of the sins of the whole world, as the sacred writers everywhere teach, and especially the Apostle, Ephesians 5 and Hebrews 7, 8, 9, and 10; yet nothing hinders a proper act of religion from being able also to participate many other virtues: just as, on the contrary, the acts of all the other virtues, as we said above, participate the nature of religion, and are in a certain way of theirs called sacrifices. For just as, if anyone render obedience to a superior for the honor of God, that obedience will be a sacrifice: so also if anyone offer a true victim to God because a superior commanded it him, that action can be called obedience. And just as an alms given to the poor for the honor of God is a certain sacrifice, so also a sacrifice offered to God for a sinner is mercy.

Someone will say: If the matter is so, then the sufferings of the Martyrs too can truly and properly be called sacrifices, although they seem to pertain chiefly to charity and fortitude.

I answer: The sufferings of the Martyrs can be called sacrifices in a broad way, like all other good works; but not properly and in strictness, like the Passion of Christ. For the Passion of Christ differs from the sufferings of the Martyrs in four ways, namely by reason of the person, the act, the form, and the end.

By reason of the person, because Christ was truly and properly a priest, Psalm 109, Thou art a priest forever, and a great priest, as the Apostle says, Hebrews 10, nay plainly the highest and greatest, who could rightly offer any victim whatever, and therefore also His own body. But the holy Martyrs either were not priests, or certainly not such as could choose a victim prescribed by law.

By reason of the act, because Christ properly sacrificed Himself, since it was in His power to die and not to die. Isaiah 53: He was offered because it was His own will. John 10: I lay down my life; no one taketh it away from me, but I lay it down. John 17: And for them I sanctify myself, that is, I offer myself as a sacrifice, as John Chrysostom expounds, homily 81 on John, and Cyril, Book 11 on John, chapter 25. But the Martyrs could neither die when they wished, nor hinder their suffering and death when they wished.

By reason of the form, because Christ was truly sacrificed by a mystic rite; for it was done not by chance, but by His own choice, that He should suffer on the festal day of the Pasch, and on the altar of the cross, and with hands stretched out, and outside the gate of the city of Jerusalem, as St. Leo notes in letter 81 to the Monks of Palestine. And John the Evangelist writes, chapter 13, Jesus knowing that His hour was come. And Paul, Hebrews 13: For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought for sin are burned outside the camp; wherefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people by His own blood, suffered outside the gate. In the deaths of the Martyrs we find nothing of the kind.

By reason of the end, because this was the proximate and principal end of the death of Christ, to appease God toward the human race, which is the end of a true sacrifice, Colossians 1: Making peace through the blood of His cross, etc.; and all the Scriptures cry the same. Wherefore all the sacrifices of the old law were figures and types of this most true and supremely propitiatory sacrifice, as Augustine testifies, Book 1 against the adversary of the law and the prophets, chapter 18, and elsewhere. But the proper end of the death of the Martyrs was not to appease God, but to bear testimony to the truth; and of its own kind the death of a Martyr is an act of fortitude, because he rather chooses to lose his life than to deny the faith. Wherefore St. Leo, letter 81 above cited: “Although,” he says, “in the sight of the Lord the death of many Saints has been precious, yet the killing of no infant was the propitiation of the world. The just received, not gave, crowns; and from the fortitude of the faithful were born examples of patience, not gifts of justice; for the deaths were singular in each, nor did anyone by his own end pay the debt of another.” And so much for the definition.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  III. 

Mortem  Christi  sacrificium  esse  proprie  clictum. 

Sed  una  occurrit  dubitatio  circa  sacrificii 
definitionem.  Nam  sacrificium  crucis,  id  est, 
Christi  passio  et  mors,  verissimum,  ac  per¬ 
fectissimum  sacrificium  fuit,  ut  Augustinus 
docet  lib.  i.  contra  advers.  leg.  et  propilet, 
cap.  18.  et  tamen  non  videtur  ei  convenire 
definitio  assignata.  Nam  (ut  alia  omittam)  ra¬ 
tio  sacrificii  a  nobis  descripta  requirit,  ut  non 
sit  actio  alicujus  virtutis,  nisi  religionis  :  mors 
autem  Christi  actio  fuit  charitatis,  patientiae, 
fortitudinis,  humilitatis,  obedientiee,  ut  Apo¬ 
stolus  prsedicat  Roman.  v.  Philipp.  n.  Hebr. 
xii.  et  alibi. 

Respondeo  :  Sacrificium  crucis  proprie  a- 
ctum  religionis  fuisse.  Christus  enim  pricci- 
pue  in  mortem  se  obtulit,  ut  esset  oblatio,  et 
sacrificium  Deo  pro  expiatione  peccatorum 
totius  mundi,  ut  sacri  scriptores  passim  do¬ 
cent,  ac  praecipue  Apostolus  Ephes.  v.  et 
Hebr.  vn.  vm.  ix  et  x.  tamen  nihil  repugnat 
quominus  actus  proprius  religionis  possit 
etiam  participare  multas  alias  virtutes  :  sic¬ 
ut  e  contrario  actus  omnium  aliarum  virtu¬ 
tum,  ut  supra  diximus,  religionis  rationem 
participant;  et  sacrificia  suo  quodam  modo 
nominantur.  Sicut  enim  si  quis  obedientiam 
superiori  praestet  ob  Dei  honorem,  illa  obe- 
dientia  sacrificium  erit :  sic  etiam  si  quis  ve¬ 
ram  hostiam  Deo  offerat,  quia  id  ei  superior 
imperaverit,  actio  illa,  obedientia  dici  pote¬ 
rit.  Et  quemadmodum  eleemosyna  pauperi 
propter  Dei  honorem  data,  sacrificium  quod¬ 
dam  est;  sic  etiam  sacrificium  pro  peccatore 
Deo  oblatum,  misericordia  est. 


Dicet  aliquis  :  Si  res  ita  se  habet,  poterunt 
etiam  Martyrum  passiones  vere,  et  proprie 
sacrificia  dici,  licet  ad  charitatem,  et  fortitu¬ 
dinem  potissimum  pertinere  videantur. 

Respondeo  :  Martyrum  passiones  sacrificia 
dici  possunt  largo  modo,  ut  omnia  alia  bona 
opera;  non  autem  proprie,  et  in  rigore,  ut 
Christi  passio  :  differt  enim  passio  Christi  a 
passionibus  Martyrum  quatuor  modis,  ratio¬ 
ne  videlicet  personae,  actus,  formse,  et  finis. 

Ratione  personae,  quia  Christus  vere,  et 
proprie  erat  sacerdosPsal.  cix.  Tu  es  sacerdos 
in  aeternam  (1),  et  sacerdos  magnus,  ut  ait 
Apostolus  Hebr.  x,  imo  plane  summus,  et 
maximus,  qui  posset  hostiam  quamlibet  rite 
offerre,  et  ideo  etiam  corpus  suum.  Sancti 
autem  martyres,  vel  sacerdotes  non  erant,  vel 
certe  non  tales,  qui  possent  eligere  victimam 
lege  praescriptam. 

Ratione  actus,  quia  Christus  proprie  seip- 
sum  sacrificavit,  cum  in  ejus  potestate  fuerit 
mori,  et  non  mori.  Isai.  liii.  Oblatus  est,  quia 
ipse  voluit.  Joan.  x.  Ego  pono  animam  meam , 
nemo  tollit  eam  a  me,  sed  ego  pono  eam.  Joan. 
xvn.  Et  pro  eis  ego  sanctifico  meipsum  (2),  id 
est,  sacrificium  offerro  meipsum,  ut  exponunt 
Joanncs  Chrysostomus  homil.  81.  in  Joan.  et 
Cyrillus  lib.  xi.  in  Joan.  cap.  25.  Martyres 
autem  nec  poterant  mori,  quando  volebant, 
nec  etiam  impedire  passionem  suam,  et  mo  r- 
tem,  quando  volebant. 

Ratione  formae,  quia  Christus  vere  mysti¬ 
co  ritu  sacrificatus  est;  non  enim  casu,  sed 
ex  electione  ipsius  factum  est,  ut  in  die  fe¬ 
sto  Paschae,  et  in  altari  crucis,  et  manibus  ex¬ 
tensis,  et  extra  portam  urbis  Hierosolymec 
pateretur,  ut  S.  Leo  notat  in  epist.  83.  ad 
Monachos  Palaestinos.  Et  Joannes  Evangcli- 
sta,  scribit  cap.  xm.  Sciens  Jesus,  quia  venit 
hora  ejus.  Et  Paulus  Hebr.  xm.  Quorum  iini- 
malium  infertur  sanguis  pjro  peccato ,  bonum 
corpora  cremantur  extra  castra ;  ita  et  Jesus, 
ut  sanctificaret  per  suum  sanguinem  populum, 
extra  portam  passus  est  (2).  In  mortibus  Mar¬ 
tyrum  nihil  ejusmodi  reperimus. 

Ratione  finis,  quia  ille  fuit  proximus,  et 
principalis  finis  mortis  Christi,  placare  Deum 
generi  humano,  qui  est  finis  veri  sacrificii, 
Coloss.  i.  Pacificans  per  sanguinem  crucis 
etc.  (4)  et  idem  clamant  omnes  Scripturae. 
Quare  omnia  sacrificia  legis  veteris,  figura? 
erant,  ac  typi  hujus  verissimi,  et  summe  pro- 


(1)  Psal.  CIX,  4.  -  (2)  Isai.  LIII,  7  ;  Joan.  X,  17  ;  XV!I,  19.  -  (3)  Joan.  XIII,  1 ;  Hebr.  XIII,  1 !. 
(4)  Coloss.  I,  20. 


CAPUT  IV. 


pitiatorii  sacrificii,  ut  Augustinus  testatur  lib. 
i.  contra  adv.  leg.  etprophet.  c.  18.  ct  alibi. 
Finis  autem  proprius  mortis  Martyrum,  non 
erat  Deum  placare,  sed  testimonium  veritati 
praebere  ;  et  ex  genere  suo  mors  Martyris  a- 
ctus  est  fortitudinis,  quia  magis  eligit  vitam 
perdere,  quam  fidem  negare.  Quare  S.  Leo 
epist.  83.  supra  citata.  «  Quamvis,  inquit,  in 
conspectu  Domini  multorum  Sanctorum  pre¬ 
tiosa  mors  fuerit,  nullius  tamen  infantis  occi¬ 
sio  propitiatio  fuit  mundi.  Accepere  justi, 
non  dedere  coronas ;  et  de  fortitudine  fide¬ 
lium  exempla  nata  sunt  patientiae,  non  dona 
justitiae  ;  singulares  quippe  in  singulis  mortes 
fuere,  nec  alterius  quisquam  debitum  suo 
fine  persolvit  »  Ac  de  definitione  hactenus.
← Chapter 2Chapter 4 →