Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Sacrament of the Eucharist · Book VI: On the Sacrifice of the Mass (Second)

Chapter 17: On the Offertory and the Preface

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. IV, De Sacramento Eucharistiae, Book VI: On the Sacrifice of the Mass (Second Book). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

On the Offertory.

The Offertory follows in order, which is always taken from the Scriptures, and thence received its name, because it was sung while the people offered, as Walafrid delivers, chapter 22, and Micrologus, chapter 10. But those five prayers: “Receive, holy Father; We offer to Thee, O Lord; Come, sanctifier; In the spirit of humility; and Receive, holy Trinity” are neither very ancient, nor were read in the Roman Church before five hundred years ago; for Micrologus writes, chapter 11, that those prayers, “Come, sanctifier,” and “Receive, holy Trinity,” are recited according to the Gallican order, but that in the Roman Order no prayers were appointed between the Offertory and the Secrets. Whence also Walafrid, Amalarius, Rupert, Alcuin, nay even Innocent III, and other ancients, made no mention of those prayers, but pass from the Offertory to the Secrets: yet because they contain nothing which offends, they were gradually received by all.

But certain little objections are to be resolved, which George Major vomited out against those prayers. First he objects, why the chalice is called saving (salutaris), in which there is nothing but wine. I answer: We do not call it "the saving chalice," but "the chalice of salvation"; and that chalice of wine is the chalice of salvation, that is, of Christ, because Christ the Saviour instituted that chalice to be offered and consecrated. Moreover we could also rightly call that chalice of wine a saving chalice, both because it is about to bring salvation after the consecration, and because the wine itself too, by signifying and representing salvation, brings salvation, in the way that the words of God are called saving, because they save by signifying and by exciting faith.

Secondly he objects, why the priest prays for the chalice, and not rather for himself? I answer: The priest does not pray for the chalice, but for himself and the whole world, when he asks that that oblation ascend to God with an odor of sweetness. For he immediately adds: “For our salvation and that of the whole world.” And even if this were not expressed, it could be understood of itself: for that the oblation be accepted by God is useful not to the oblation, but to us.

Thirdly he objects, why in that prayer, “In the spirit of humility,” the priest asks that the oblation may please, after he has offered it: for this is a sign that he doubts whether it please, and accordingly has sinned by offering without faith. I answer: The priest does not doubt that the sacrifice of the Mass pleases God of itself, or from the institution of Christ, and therefore with a most certain faith offers a sacrifice most pleasing to God, but he doubts of his own disposition, and therefore asks for himself a spirit of humility and contrition, that he may so perform the begun sacrifice that even on his part it may please God: nor does he sin by offering without a certain faith of his own worthiness, because he is not bound to have that certainty, but only bound not to have the consciousness of sin, Paul saying: Let a man prove himself, etc.

Fourthly he objects, why in that prayer, “Come, sanctifier, etc.,” the sacrifice is said to be prepared, when it was already before offered. I answer: That former oblation was a preparation for the latter oblation, in which the sacrifice properly consists; accordingly the sacrifice is rightly said to be prepared, when the matter to be consecrated to God is dedicated by a certain oblation.

On the Preface.

The Offertory being ended, and the matter of the sacrifice prepared, and the hands washed, and the oblation commended to God by the secret Collects, the Preface is said, which indeed is called by this name because it is a preparation and excitation of the people for that action in which the sacrifice properly consists. And first those words: “Through all ages of ages,” pertain to the preceding prayers recited in silence, but this conclusion is said in a loud voice, that the people can respond “Amen”; and by that word confirm the preceding prayers; so Micrologus writes, chapter 7.

Then the Preface begins by that: “The Lord be with you,” and as far as those words: “It is truly meet and just,” it is had in the most ancient authors, Greek and Latin. For to omit the Liturgies, in none of which is this preface lacking, of these words there make mention Clement, Book 8 of the Constitutions, chapter 16; Cyprian in sermon 6 on the Lord's prayer; Cyril of Jerusalem, catechesis 5, mystagogical; Chrysostom passim, as in the homily on the Eucharist: “What dost thou, O man, didst thou not promise the priest, who said, Lift up your hearts, and thou saidst, We have them to the Lord?” See also homily 4 on the nature of God, and Augustine no less frequently, as in letter 57 to Dardanus, and 120 to Honoratus, and 156 to Proba, in the book on the Spirit and the letter, chapter 11, and Book 2 on the good of perseverance, chapter 13.

The rest of the words, as far as that verse: “Holy, Holy, etc.,” are not the same in the Greek and Latin Liturgies: yet those which are had in our, that is, the Roman Church's Liturgy, it is certain are most ancient. For more than 1000 years ago Pope Pelagius II, being asked by the bishops of Germany and Gaul what and how many were the authentic Prefaces, answered that there were nine. The first, of the Nativity of the Lord. The second, of the Epiphany. The third, of Lent. The fourth, of the Cross. The fifth, of Easter. The sixth, of the Ascension. The seventh, of Pentecost. The eighth, of the Trinity. The ninth, of the Apostles. See the letter of Pelagius, and Gratian, canon Invenimus, on consecration, distinction 1. The tenth Preface, which is of Saint Mary, Urban II added in the Council of Piacenza, about the year of the Lord 1080 (1095), as Gratian testifies, canon Sanctorum, distinction 70.

Holy, Holy, etc.

The Preface being ended, the Canticle is said: “Holy, Holy, etc.,” which indeed is partly taken from the hymn of the Angels, which Isaiah, chapter 6, narrates that he heard; partly from the canticle of the Hebrews, which they sang to Christ when on Palm Sunday He entered Jerusalem, Matthew 21; and it is had in the ancient Liturgies of James, Basil, and Chrysostom: and of it there is a special Canon in the Council of Vaison, canon 4, otherwise canon 6.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  XVII. 

Do  Offet  ■(orto,  et  Prxfatioae. 

DE  OFFEBTGUiO. 

Offertorium  ordine  sequitur  quod  ex  Scri¬ 
pturis  perpetuo  sumitur,  et  inde  nomen  ac¬ 
cepit,  quodcaneretur  dumpopulus  offerebat, 
ut  Walfridus  tradit  cap.  22.  et  Micrologus 
cap.  10.  Quinque  autem  illa:  orationes  : 
<t  Suscipe  sancte  Pater  :  Offerimus  tibi  Do¬ 
mine  :  Veni  sanctificator  :  In  spiritu  humili¬ 
tatis,  et  :  Suscipe  sancta  Trinitas;  »  Neque 
antiqua:  admodum  sunt,  neque  in  Romana 
Ecclesia  ante  quingentos  annos  legebantur, 


41  a 

scribit  enim  Micrologus  cap.  11  illas  preces  : 

«  Veni  sanctificator  »,  et  :  «  Suscipe  sancta 
Trinitas,  »  juxta  ordinem  Gallicanum  recita¬ 
ri,  sed  in  Ordine  Romano  nullas  orationes 
esse  institutas  inter  Offertorium,  et  Secretas. 
Unde  etiam  Walfridus,  Amalarius,  Rupertus, 
Alcuinus,  imo  etiam  Innocentius  III.  et  alii 
veteres,  non  meminerunt  illarum  orationum, 
sed  transeunt  ab  Offertorio  ad  Secretas  : 
Quia  tamen  nihil  continent,  quod  offendat, 
paulatim  ab  omnibus  recepta:  sunt. 

Sed  objectiuncuhe  qu aulam  solvenda:  sunt, 
quas  Georgius  Major  in  preces  illas  evomuit. 
Primo  objicit,  cur  dicatur  calix  salutaris,  in 
quo  nihil  est  nisi  vinum.  Respondeo:  non 
vocamus  calicem  salutarem,  sed  calicem  sa¬ 
lutaris  ;  est  autem  calix  ille  vini,  calix  salu¬ 
taris,  id  est,  Christi,  quia  Christus  Salvator 
eum  calicem  offerendum  et  consecrandum 
instituit.  Praeterea  possemus  etiam  recte  vo¬ 
care  calicem  salutarem,  calicem  illuni  vini, 
tum  quia  salutem  est  allaturus  post  conse¬ 
crationem,  tum  quia  ipsum  etiam  vinum  si¬ 
gnificando,  et  repraesentando  salutem  affert, 
quomodo  verba  Dei  dicuntur  salutaria,  quia 
salvant  significando  et  fidem  excitando. 

Secundo  objicit,  cur  Sacerdos  oret  pro 
calice,  et  non  potius  pro  se?  Respondeo  : 
Non  orat  Sacerdos  pro  calice,  sed  pro  se  et 
universo  mundo,  cum  petit,  ut  oblatio  illa 
ascendat  ad  Deum  cum  odore  suavitatis. 
Nam  statim  addit  :  «  Pro  nostra,  et  totius 
mundi  salute.  »  Et  etiamsi  hoc  non  exprime¬ 
retur,  per  se  posset  intelligi  :  nam  oblatio¬ 
nem  acceptari  a  Deo,  non  est  utile  oblationi, 
sed  nobis. 

Tertio  objicit,  cur  in  illa  oratione  :  «  In 
spiritu  humilitatis  » ,  petat  Sacerdos,  ut  obla¬ 
tio  placeat,  postquam  illam  obtulit  :  id  enim 
signum  est,  eum  dubitare  an  placeat,  et 
proinde  peccasse,  offerendo  sine  fide.  Re¬ 
spondeo  :  Non  dubitat  Sacerdos,  quin  placeat 
Deo  sacrificium  Missa:  ex  se,  sive  ex  Christi 
instituto,  et  ideo  certissima  fide  offert  sacri¬ 
ficium  Deo  gratissimum,  sed  dubitat  de  pro- 
pria  dispositione,  et  idcirco  petit  sibi  spiritum 
humilitatis,  et  contritionis,  ut  sacrificium 
inchoatum  ita  peragat,  ut  etiam  ex  parte  sua 
Deo  placeat  :  neque  peccat  offerendo  sine 
certa  fide  propria:  dignitatis,  quia  non  tene¬ 
tur  habere  istam  certitudinem,  sed  solum 
tenetur  non  habere  conscientiam  peccati, 
dicente  Paulo  :  Probet  seipsurn  homo  etc.  (1). 


(1)1  Corinth,  XI,  18. 


414 


LIBER  VI. 


Quarto  objicit,  cur  dicatur  in  illa  oratione  : 
«  Veni  sanctificator  etc.  »  sacrificium  prae¬ 
parari  cum  jam  ante  sit  oblatum.  Respondeo : 
Illa  prior  oblatio,  praeparatio  fuit  ad  poste¬ 
riorem  oblationem,  in  qua  proprie  sacrifi¬ 
cium  consistit,  proinde  recte  dicitur  praepa¬ 
ratum  sacrificium,  quando  materia  sacranda 
Deo,  per  quamdam  oblationem  est  dedicata. 

I>E  PRAEFATIONE. 

Offertorio  finito,  et  materia  sacrificii  prae¬ 
parata,  lotisque  manibus,  et  oblatione  Deo 
commendata  per  secretas  Collectas,  dicitur 
Praefatio,  quae  quidem  hoc  nomine  appella¬ 
tur,  quia  est  praeparatio,  et  excitatio  populi 
ad  illam  actionem,  in  qua  proprie  sacrificium 
consistit.  Ac  primum  illa  verba  :  «  Per  om¬ 
nia  saecula  saeculorum,  »  pertinent  ad  supe¬ 
riores  orationes  silentio  recitatas,  sed  dicitur 
alta  voce  ista  conclusio,  ut  populus  respon¬ 
dere  possit,  «  Arnen  »  ;  et  ea  voce  confirmet 
superiores  orationes,  ita  scribit  Micrologus, 
cap.  7. 

Deinde  incipit  Praefatio  per  illud  :  «  Domi¬ 
nus  vobiscum,  »  et  usque  ad  ea  verba : 
a  Vere  dignum,  et  justum  est,  »  habetur  in 
antiquissimis  auctoribus  Graecis,  et  Latinis. 
Nam  ut  omittam  Liturgias,  in  quarum  nulla 
deest  haec  praefatio,  meminerunt  horum  ver¬ 
borum  Clemens  lib.  vm.  constit.  cap.  16. 
Cyprianus  in  serm.  G.  de  orat.  Dominica. 
Cyrillus  Ilicrosolymitamus  Catechesi  5.  my- 
stagogica.  Chrysostomus  passirn,  ut  hom.  de 
Eucharistia:  «Quid  facis,  o  homo,  non  pro¬ 
misisti  Sacerdoti,  qui  dixit,  Sursum  corda, 
et  dixisti,  Habemus  ad  Dominum  ?  »  Vide 
etiam  homil.  4.  de  natura  Dei,  et  Augusti¬ 
nus  non  minus  frequenter,  ut  in  epistola  57. 
ad  Dardanum,  et  120.  ad  Honoratum,  et  156. 
ad  Probam,  lib.  de  spiritu,  et  littera,  cap. 
11.  lib.  ii.  de  bono  perseverantiae  cap.  13. 

Reliqua  verba,  usque  ad  illum  versum  : 

«  Sanctus,  Sanctus  etc.  »  non  sunt  eadem  in 
Graecis,  et  Latinis  Liturgiis  :  tamen  quae  in 
nostra,  id  est,  Romanae  Ecclesiae  Liturgia 
habentur,  certum  est  antiquissima  esse.  Nam 
ante  annos  1000.  Pelagius  II.  Papa  interro¬ 
gatus  ab  Episcopis  Germaniae,  et  Galliae, 
quaenam  essent,  et  quot  authenticae  Praefa¬ 
tiones,  respondit  esse  novem.  Primam,  de 
Natali  Domini.  Secundam,  de  Epiphania. 
Tertiam,  de  Quadragesima.  Quartam,  de 
Cruce.  Quintam,  de  Pascha.  Sextam,  de  As¬ 


censione.  Septimam,  de  Pentecoste.  Octa¬ 
vam,  de  Trinitate.  Nonam,  de  Apostolis. 
Vide  epistolam  Pelagii,  et  Gratianum  can. 
Invenimus,  de  consecrat,  dist.  1.  Decimam 
Praefationem,  quae  est  de  S.  Maria,  addidit 
Urbanus  II.  in  Concilio  Placentino  circa  an¬ 
num  Domini  1080.  teste  Gratiano,  can. 
Sanctorum,  dist.  70. 

SANCTUS,  SANCTUS,  ETC. 

Finita  Praefatione  dicitur  Canticum  : 
«  Sanctus,  Sanctus  etc.  »  quod  quidem  par- 
tim  desumptum  est  ex  hymno  Angelorum, 
quem  Isaias  cap.  vi.  audivisse  se  narrat; 
partim  ex  cantico  Hebraeorum,  quod  Christo 
cecinerunt,  cum  in  die  Palmarum  intraret 
in  Hierusalem,  Matth.  21.  et  habetur  in  an¬ 
tiquis  Liturgiis,  Jacobi,  Basilii,  et  Chryso- 
stomi  :  et  de  eo  exstat  peculiaris  Canon  in 
Concilio  Vasensi,  can.  4  alias  can.  6.
← Chapter 16Chapter 18 →