Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On Grace and Free Choice · Book IV: Grace and Free Choice in Natural and Civil Works

Chapter 1: The order of the coming disputation is set forth

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. VI, De Gratia et Libero Arbitrio, Book IV. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

We have discoursed thus far on the nature of free choice; now we set about disputing on the powers of the same choice, and at the same time on the necessity of grace.

Now there are three kinds of human cognitions, and likewise of actions. For one cognition is natural, whether it be theoretical or mechanical; another is moral cognition — that is, the knowledge of that which, according to virtue, is either to be done or to be omitted; another, finally, is supernatural cognition — that is, of those things which cannot be known unless they be divinely revealed. So also of actions: some can be called natural, such as to walk, to sit, to till fields, to wage wars, and other things of that kind; others moral, in which are contained all the actions of the virtues and the vices, as to give alms, to fast, and the like — and contrariwise, to steal, to fornicate, and others of the same kind; others divine and supernatural, which properly pertain to attaining eternal salvation, as to believe, to hope, to love, to pray, to sacrifice, and the rest.

And although the actions of the first kind, which we have called natural — and which by some are also named civil — in the particular, or (as the Theologians speak) in the individual, are necessarily good or evil morally (according to the doctrine of St. Thomas, which we follow as the more probable), yet of their own kind they are indifferent; and it can even come to pass that someone is free in actions of this kind insofar as they are natural, and is not free insofar as they are moral. So, if anyone should think that all the works of unbelievers are sins, he will perhaps say that the unbelieving man has free choice for tilling a field or not tilling it, insofar as to till a field is a natural work; but has it not, insofar as it is a moral work — because he will be able to till the field or not till it, but will not be able in that work by any means to avoid sin.

We, then, concerning each of these kinds of cognitions and actions, shall treat three questions: one, whether man needs the help of special grace for knowing things; a second, whether he needs help for performing the same things; a third, whether, the aid of grace being admitted, that work is in the free power of man. Wherefore there will be nine principal questions, besides others which will have to be discussed on occasion of these.

The first question will be whether we need grace for knowing natural truth. The second, whether for natural actions, as such, we also need grace. The third, whether for the same actions, even as such, we have free choice of the will. The fourth, whether without the help of grace we can know moral truth. The fifth, whether for moral works — that is, for keeping the precepts and avoiding sins — we have need of the help of grace. The sixth, whether it is in our power to act well and ill morally. The seventh, whether the help of grace is necessary for knowing supernatural truth. The eighth, whether the same help of grace is necessary for the divine actions of believing, hoping, loving, etc. The ninth, whether man has free choice in such supernatural and divine actions.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
Disseruimus  hactenus  de  natura  liberi  ar¬ 
bitrii ;  nunc  de  viribus  ejusdem  arbitrii, 
et  simul  de  gratifc  necessitate  disputare  ag¬ 
gredimur. 

Sunt  autem  tria  genera  humanarum,  tum 
cognitionum,  tum  actionum.  Est  enim  alia 
cognitio  naturalis,  sive  theoricasit,  sive  me¬ 
chanica:  alia  est  cognitio  moralis,  id  est, 
notitia  ejus,  quod  secundum  virtutem  est  vel 
agendum,  vel  omittendum ;  alia  denique  est 
cognitio  supernaturalis,  idest,  eorum,  qua? 
sciri  non  possunt,  nisi  divinitus  revelentur. 
Sic  etiam  actionum  aliae  naturales  dici  pos¬ 
sunt,  quales  sunt  ambulare,  sedere,  colere 
agros,  gerere  bella,  et  alia  id  genus ;  aliae 
morales,  quibus  actiones  omnes  virtutum,  et 
vitiorum  continentur,  ut  eleemosynas  dare, 
jejunare  et  similia  ;  ut  contra,  furari,  forni¬ 
cari ;  et  alia  ejusdem  generis;  aliae  divinae, 
ac  supernaturales,  quae  proprie  ad  salutem 
aeternam  consequendam  pertinent,  ut  cre¬ 
dere,  sperare,  diligere,  orare,  sacrificare, 
et  caetera. 

Et  quamvis  actiones  primi  generis,  quas 
naturales  diximus,  et  a  quibusdam  civiles 
etiam  nominantur,  in  particulari,  sive  (ut 
Theologi  loquuntur)  in  individuo  necessario 
sint  bonae,  aut  malae  moraliter  (juxta  doc¬ 
trinam  S.  Thomse,  quam  nos  ut  probabilio¬ 
rem  sequimur)  tamen  ex  genere  suo  indiffe¬ 
rentes  :  unt,  et  potest  etiam  fieri,  ut  aliquis 
sit  liber  in  ejusmodi  actionibus,  qua  parte 


naturales  sunt,  et  non  sit  liber  qua  parte 
sunt  morales,  ut  si  quis  existimet  omnia  ope¬ 
ra  infidelium  esse  peccata,  is  fortasse  dicet, 
habere  hominem,  infidelem  liberum  arbi- 
trium  ad  colendum  agrum,  et  non  colendum, 
quatenus  colere  agrum  est  opus  naturale  ; 
non  autem  habere,  quatenus  est  opus  morale 
quia  poterit  colere  agrum,  vel  non  colere, 
sed  non  poterit  in  eo  opere  ulla  ratione  vi¬ 
tare  peccatum. 

Nos  igitur  de  singulis  his  cognitionum, 
actionumque  generibus  tres  tractabimus 
qiia?stiones  :  unam,  egeatne  homo  auxilio 
gratise  specialis  ad  res  cognoscendas;  alte¬ 
ram,  egeatne  auxilio  ad  res  easdem  per¬ 
agendas  ;  tertiam,  admisso  gratiee  adjumen¬ 
to,  sit  ne  opus  illud  in  libera  hominis  pote¬ 
state.  Quare  novem  erunt  praecipuae  quae¬ 
stiones,  praeter  alias,  quae  harum  occasione 
discutiendae  erunt. 

Prima  quaestio  erit,  an  ad  cognoscendum 
verum  naturale,  indigeamus  gratia.  Secun¬ 
da,  an  ad  actiones  naturales,  ut  tales  sunt, 
egeamus  etiam  gratia.  Teitia,  an  ad  easdem 
actiones,  etiam  ut  tales  sunt,  habeamus  li¬ 
berum  voluntatis  arbitrium.  Quarta,  utrum 
sine  auxilio  gratia?  cognoscere  possimus  ve¬ 
rum  morale.  Quinta,  utrum  ad  moralia  ope¬ 
ra,  id  est,  ad  preeeepta  servanda,  et  peccata 
cavenda  opus  habeamus  auxilio  gratise.  Sex.- 
ta,  utrum  sit  in  nostra  potestate  bene  et 
male  agere  moraliter.  Septima,  sit  ne  auxi¬ 
lium  gratise  necessarium  ad  cognoscendum 
verum  supernaturale.  Octava,  sit  ne  idem 
auxilium  gratia?  necessarium  adactiones  di¬ 
vinas,  credendi,  sperandi,  diligendi  etc.  No¬ 
na,  sit  ne  homo  liberi  arbitrii  in  ejusmodi 
actionibus  supernaturaiibus,  atque  divjpis. 


-8 


LIBER  IV.
← The Bellarmine TranslationChapter 2 →