Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Grace of the First Man

Chapter 13: Objections are answered

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. V, De Gratia Primi Hominis. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

Nor indeed are the arguments of the contrary opinion such that they cannot be solved.

For they object, first, that Scripture witnesses that paradise was planted in Eden toward the east, Genesis 2; and that Eden is a place near Haran in Mesopotamia, as can be understood from that of Ezekiel 27, Haran, and Chene, and Eden were thy merchants; and from that of 4 Kings 19: Have the gods of the nations delivered any of them, whom my fathers have destroyed, to wit, Gozan, and Haran, and Reseph, and the children of Eden that were in Thelassar?; and finally from that of Genesis 4: And Cain went out from the face of the Lord, and dwelt as a fugitive on the earth, at the east side of Eden. Second, that in Mesopotamia are found the rivers which are said to have been in paradise. Third, that that region is most lovely.

But we answer that the word Eden in Scripture is now the name of a place, and now signifies delights, or pleasure, as is known to those skilled in the Hebrew tongue. And indeed in the places cited it is evident that Eden is the name of a place; but that it is not that place whence Adam was cast out, it seems no light argument that Cain is said to have dwelt in it — unless one be so foolish as to think that paradise was given to Cain for a place of exile. Besides, from the Eden where paradise was there arose a river, which thence is divided into four heads, Genesis 2; but that from the Eden which is near Mesopotamia no river of that kind arises is most fully ascertained. And that in the second chapter of Genesis it is not the name of a place, but signifies pleasure, the authority of the vulgate edition sufficiently persuades us, and of St. Jerome, who not only so rendered it, but also notes in the Hebrew Questions that Symmachus so rendered it, and the Seventy themselves. As regards the rivers, and the loveliness of the place, we have already shown that in Mesopotamia none of the rivers of paradise arises, and that its loveliness is not that which is said to have been in paradise; hence that opinion is better refuted than confirmed by the argument of the rivers and of the loveliness.

There is another argument which could be made against us, concerning the springs of the Euphrates and Tigris, which are reported to be known. But St. Augustine answers, book 8 On Genesis, chapter 7; Theodoret, question 29 on Genesis; and Rupert, book 2 on Genesis, chapter 24. But we shall adduce in this place the words of Augustine alone: “Since” (says St. Augustine) “the very place of paradise is most remote from the knowledge of men, it is to be believed that the four branches of waters are divided thence, as the most faithful Scripture witnesses; but that those rivers whose springs are said to be known have somewhere gone under the earth, and after the courses of far-stretching regions have burst forth in other places, where they are reported to be known as if at their own springs. For who is ignorant that some waters are wont to do this?”

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
Neque  vero  ejusmodi  sunt  argumenta  sen¬ 
tentiae  contrariae,  ut  solvi  non  possint. 

Objiciunt  enim  primo,  quod  Scriptura 
testetur  paradisum  plantatatum  fuisse  in 
Eden  ad  Orientem,  Genes,  ii  ;  Eden  autem 
locus  sit  prope  Charam  in  Mesopotamia,  ut 
intelligi  potest  ex  illo  Ezechiel.xxvn:  Charan 
et  Chene,  et  Eden  negotiatores  tui ,  et  ex  illo 
IV  llegum.  xvm  :  Num  quid  liberaverunt  Dii 
gentium  singulos,  quos  vastaverunt  Patres  mei , 
Goram  videlicet ,  et  Charan  et  Iieseph,  et  filios 
Eden  qui  erant  in  Thalassar.  Et  denique 
ex  illo  Genes,  iv.  Egressusque  Cain  a  facie 
Domini ,  habitavit  profugus  in  terra  ad  Orien¬ 
talem  plagam  Eden  (2).  Secundo,  quod  in 
Mesopotamia  reperiantur  flumina  quae  di¬ 
cuntur  fuisse  in  paradiso.  Tertio,  quod  ea 
sit  regio  amoenissima. 

Sed  respondemus,  vocem  Eden  in  Scri¬ 
ptura  nunc  esse  nomen  loci,  nunc  vero  sig¬ 


nificare  delicias,  seu  voluptatem,  ut  notum 
est  linguae  Hebraicae  peritis.  Et  quidem  in 
locis  citatis  Eden  esse  nomen  loci  perspi¬ 
cuum  est,  sed  non  esse  cum  locum,  unde 
ejectus  fuit  Adam,  non  leve  argumentum 
esse  videtur,  quod  in  eodem  dicatur  habi¬ 
tasse  Cain,  nisi  quis  ita  desipiat,  ut  existi¬ 
met  datum  fuisse  Camo  pro  exilio  paradi¬ 
sum.  Praeterea  ex  Eden,  ubi  erat  paradisus, 
oriebatur  flumen,  quod  inde  dividitur  in  qua- 
tuorcapita,  Gcn.  ii.  AtexEden,  quodestprope 
Mesopotamiam  nullum  ejusmodi  flumen  ori¬ 
ri  compertissimum  est.  In  secundo  autem 
cap.  Genes,  non  esse  nomen  loci,  sed  volu¬ 
ptatem  significare  satis  nobis  persuadet  au¬ 
ctoritas  editionis  vulgatae,  et  S.  Hieronymi, 
qui  non  solum  ita  vertit,  sed  etiam  in  quaest. 
Hebraicis  notat,  sic  vertisse  Symmaichum,  et 
ipsos  etiam  Septuaginta.  Quod  attinet  ad 
flumina,  et  loci  amoenitatem,  jam  ostendi¬ 
mus  in  Mesopotomia  nullum  oriri  ex  flumi¬ 
nibus  paradisi,  neque  eam  esse  amoenita¬ 
tem,  quae  fuisse  dicitur  in  paradiso.  Proinde 
eam  sententiam  melius  refelli,  quam  con¬ 
firmari  argumento  fluminum,  et  amoenita¬ 
tis. 

Est  aliud  argumentum  quod  contra  nos  fie¬ 
ri  posset  de  fontibus  Euphratis,  et  Tigris, 
qui  noti  esse  perhibentur.  Sed  respondent  S. 
Augustinus  lib.  viii.  de  Gen.  cap.  7.  Thco- 
doretus  quaest.  29.  in  Genes,  et  Rupertus 
lib.  ii.  in  Genes,  cap.  24.  Sed  unius  Au¬ 
gustini  verba  hoc  loco  adducemus  :  «  Quo¬ 
niam  (inquit  S.  Augustinus)  locus  ipse  pa¬ 
radisi  a  cognitione  hominum  est  remotissi¬ 
mus,  inde  quatuor  aquarum  partes  dividi 
credendum  est,  sicut  fidelissima  Scriptura 
testatur.  Sed  ea  flumina,  quorum  fontes  noti 
esse  dicuntur,  alicubi  isse  sub  terras,  et 
post  tractus  prolixarum  regium  locis  aliis 
erupisse,  ubi  tamquam  in  suis  fontibus  noti 
esse  perhibentur.  Nam  hoc  solere  nonnullas 
aquas  facere,  quis  ignorat  ?  » 


CAPUT  XIV. 

Paradisum  adhuc  superesse.
← Chapter 12Chapter 14 →