Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Sacraments in General · Book II: On the Effect, Number, and Ceremonies of the Sacraments

Chapter 20: The Character is proved from the Scriptures

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. III, De Sacramentis in Genere, Book II: On the Effect, Number, and Ceremonies of the Sacraments. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

As to the third, it must be proved from the divine letters that a character exists. Where meanwhile it is to be observed that it is no marvel if there be not found so many testimonies, and so express, of the character as are found of grace. For grace is the principal effect, the character a secondary; likewise grace is the effect of all the Sacraments, the character of some only; and accordingly the true notion of a Sacrament can stand without a character. Finally the knowledge of grace is more necessary than of the character. Yet there are not lacking places of Scripture from which the character can be gathered, especially with the added explanation of the Fathers and of the Church, without which no Ecclesiastical dogma can be established with complete certainty.

The first testimony is 2 Corinthians 1: He that hath anointed us is God, who also hath sealed us, and given the pledge of the Spirit in our hearts. Here three effects of the Sacrament of Confirmation are set down, in which we are properly anointed and sealed, both outwardly and inwardly. First, the anointing, which without doubt is done through sanctifying grace. For as oil heals diseases, makes the members robust, brightens, consoles, etc., so justifying grace does. Second is the sign, or a certain sealing, by which we are consecrated to God and deputed to his worship; and by this we understand the character, which the Fathers everywhere call a sign and seal. Third, the pledge of the Spirit — that is, the testimony of a good conscience, which follows justification, and is, as it were, the earnest of the figure of glory. For nothing in this world is more delightful than the testimony of a good conscience; for this is the peace which surpasseth all understanding. Nor can it be answered that by this sign is understood the external Sacrament itself, by which the promises are sealed, as the adversaries will have it; both because Paul speaks of the sealing of the heart, not of the body, as also of the internal anointing and the internal testimony; and also because Paul says that we are sealed, not the promises. Otherwise it would also have to be said that the promises are anointed; for Paul speaks in the same manner of the sign and of the anointing. See Ambrose book 1 On the Holy Spirit chapter 6, Haymo and Theodoret on this place.

The second place is Ephesians 1: In whom also believing you were signed with the holy Spirit of promise, who is the pledge of our inheritance. Where note that that (believing) in the Greek is of the past tense, that is, after you believed. Wherefore he speaks of Baptism, which is given after faith; and says that in Baptism a sealing is given by the virtue of the Holy Spirit. And so they expound of the seal which is received in Baptism, the Greeks and Latins — Chrysostom, Theophylact, Jerome, Haymo, Bede, Anselm, and others. Nor can we say that here is treated the sealing of the promises to excite faith, since this signing is given after faith. The third place is Ephesians 4: Grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby you are signed unto the day of redemption; where by the day of redemption he understands the day of regeneration through Baptism, as Haymo and Oecumenius noted. Nor does that particle, unto the day, stand in the way; for the Apostle is wont to use the preposition which is joined with the accusative for the preposition which is joined with the dative among the Greeks and the ablative among the Latins; as 2 Timothy last: He will save me unto his heavenly kingdom — that is, in his heavenly kingdom. All these places Calvin in his commentary expounds of the sealing of the promises which God makes in the hearts, that faith may be more confirmed. But the manner of speaking of the Apostle repugns it, who always says that we are sealed; for it would be too improper and unusual an expression, that a man is sealed, for that which is, that the promises made to a man are sealed.

To these let there be added the figure and the prediction of the Old Testament. For Circumcision was a figure of Baptism by the consent of all. But Circumcision not only cut off the flesh, by which was signified justification from sin, but also left in the body a certain cautery, as it were, by which the Jews were distinguished from non-Jews. Which cautery, if it signified anything, certainly signified the character which Christians bear in the soul, by which we shall be distinguished for ever from non-Christians. The prediction is had Isaias 66, where the Lord, speaking of the vocation of the Gentiles: All nations, he says, and tongues shall come, and shall see my glory, and I will set a sign among them, etc. For although by this sign can be understood the sign of the cross, or something else, yet nothing repugns if we say the character is understood; especially since we see Paul speaking of a certain internal spiritual sign, and Scripture must be expounded by Scripture, when it can be done. Some add another figure from Exodus 12, where the doorposts and lintels are signed with the blood of the lamb, and the prediction of Ezekiel 9: Mark Thau on the foreheads of them that groan and mourn. But these places are not to the point. For they are expounded by the Fathers of the sign of the cross, which is inscribed on the forehead, and rightly; for Ezekiel names the forehead, and the lintel signifies the same in the door of a house which the forehead is in a man. Whence also in Apocalypse 7, where a like sealing is had, the forehead too is named: Till we sign the servants of our God in their foreheads. And besides, in each place all who are signed are said to be saved, and none not signed to be saved; which certainly does not agree with the character; for many with the character will be damned, and many without the character will be saved. But all are saved who are signed with the blood of Christ's cross — that is, to whom the merit of the crucified is applied, whose figure is the sign of the cross; and none are saved to whom this merit is not applied. See on these places Cyprian in the treatise against Demetrian, Jerome on chapter 9 of Ezekiel, Gaudentius treatise 5 on Exodus.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  XX. 

Probatur  character  ex  Scripturis. 

Quantum  ad  Tertium,  probandum  est  ex 
divinis  litteris,  characterem  esse.  Ubi  inte- 
rim  Observandum  est,  non  esse  mirandum, 
si  non  inveniantur  tot  testimonia,  et  tam 
expressa  de  charactere,  ut  inveniuntur  de 
gratia.  Nam  gratia  est  effectus  principalis, 
character  secundarius,  item  gratia  est  ef¬ 
fectus  omnium  Sacramentorum,  character 
aliquorum  tantum ;  proinde  vera  ratio  Sa¬ 
cramenti  potest  sine  charactere  consistere. 
Denique  notitia  gratia?  magis  necessaria  est, 
quam  characteris.  Non  desunt  tamen  loca 
Scriptura?,  ex  quibus  character  colligi  pos¬ 
sit,  praesertim  adjuncta  explicatione  Patrum, 
et  Ecclesiae,  sine  qua  nullum  dogma  Eccle¬ 
siasticum  omnino  certo  statui  potest. 

Primum  testimonium  est  II  Gorinth.  I  ; 
Qin  unxit  nos  Deus,  et  signavit  nos,  et  dedit 
pignus  Spiritus  in  cordibus  nostris  (I).  Hic 
tres  effectus  ponuntur  Sacramenti  confima- 
tionis,  in  quo  proprie  ungimur,  et  signamur 
tum  exterius,  tum  interius.  Primo  unctio, 
quae  sine  dubio  fit  per  gratiam  gratum  fa¬ 
cientem.  Ut  enim  oleum  sanat  morbos,  red¬ 
dit  robusta  membra,  illustrat,  consolatur 
etc.  ita  gratia  justificans  facit.  Secundo  est 
signum,  seu  obsignatio  qua?dam,  qua  conse¬ 
cramur  Deo,  et  deputamur  ad  ejus  cultum, 
et  per  hanc  intelligimus  characterem,  quem 
Patres  passim  signum  et  sigillum  vocant. 
Tertio  pignus  spiritus,  id  est,  testimonium 
bonae  conscientiae,  quod  sequitur  justifica¬ 
tionem,  et  est  quasi  arrhabo  figura?  gloriae. 
Nihil  enim  in  hoc  mundo  jucundius  testimo¬ 
nio  bona?  conscientiae  :  haec  est  enim  pax, 
qua?  exsuperat  omnem  sensum.  Neque  po¬ 
test  responderi  per  hoc  signum  intelligi  ip¬ 
sum  Sacramentum  externum,  quo  obsignan¬ 
tur  promissiones,  ut  adversarii  volunt;  tum 
quia  Paulus  loquitur  de  obsignatione  cordis, 
non  corporis,  ut  etiam  de  unctione  interna, 
et  testimonio  interno  ;  tum  etiam  quia  Pau- 


CAPUT  XX. 


473 


lus  dicit  nos  obsignari,  non  promissiones. 
Alioqui  etiam  oporteret  dicere  inungi  pro¬ 
missiones  :  nam  eodem  modo  loquitur  Pau¬ 
lus  de  signo,  et  de  unctione.  Vide  Ambro¬ 
sium  lib.  I.  de  Spiritu  sancto  cap.  G.  Ilay- 
inonem  et  Theodoretum  in  hunc  locum. 

Secundus  locus  est  Ephes.  I  :  In  quo  et 
credentes  signati  estis  Spiritu  promissionis  sanc¬ 
to,  qui  est  pignus  hcereditatis  (I).  Ubi  nota 
illud  (credentes)  in  Grajco  esse  temporis 
praeteriti  7rwTev<xavTej,  id  est,  postquam  credi¬ 
distis.  Quocirca  loquitur  de  Baptismate, 
quod  datur  post  fidem  ;  ac  dicit  in  Baptis¬ 
mate  dari  obsignationem  virtute  Spiritus 
sancti.  Et  ita  exponunt  de  signaculo,  quod 
accipitur  in  Baptismo  Grseci  et  Latini,  Chry- 
sostomus,  Theophylactus ,  Hieronymus, 
Havmo,  Beda,  Anselmus,  et  alii.  Nec  pos¬ 
sumus  dicere  hic  agi  de  obsignatione  pro¬ 
missionum  ad  excitandam  fidem,  quando¬ 
quidem  haec  signatio  datur  post  fidem. 

Tertius  locus  est  Ephes.  IV  :  Nolite  con¬ 
tristare  Spiritum  sanctum  Dei ,  in  quo  signati 
estis  in  diem  redemptionis ;  ubi  per  diem  re¬ 
demptionis  (2),  intelligit  diem  regenerationis 
per  Baptismum,  ut  Haymo  ,  et  GEcumenius 
annotarunt.  Neque  obstat  particula  illa,  in 
diem ,  quia  Apostolus  solet  usurpare  praepo¬ 
sitionem  et,  quae  conjungitur  accusativo,  pro 
praepositione  h ,  quae  conjungitur  dativo 
apud  Graecos,  et  ablativo  apud  Latinos  :  ut 
II  Tim.  ult.  :  Salvabit  me  in  regnum  suum  coe¬ 
leste  (3),  id  est,  in  regno  suo  coelesti. 

Haec  omnia  loca  Calvinus  in  commentario 
exponit  de  obsignatione  promissionum, quam 
Deus  in  cordibus  facit,  ut  fides  magis  con¬ 
firmetur.  Sed  repugnat  modus  loquendi  Apo¬ 
stoli,  qui  semper  dicit,  non  obsignari,  esset 
enim  nimis  impropria  ,  et  inusitata  locutio, 
obsignari  hominem,  pro  eo  quod  est,  obsig¬ 
nari  promissiones  homini  factas. 

His  accedant  figura  ,  et  vaticinium  Testa¬ 
menti  veteris.  Nam  Circumcisio  fuit  figura 
Baptismi  omnium  consensu.  Circumcisio  au¬ 
tem  non  solum  prajeidebat  carnem,  quo  si¬ 
gnificabatur  justificatio  a  peccato,  sed  etiam 
relinquebat  in  corpore  quoddam  veluti  cau¬ 
terium,  quo  discernebantur  Judici  a  non  Ju¬ 
dicis.  Quod  cauterium  si  quid  significabat, 
certe  significabat  characterem,  quem  in  ani¬ 
ma  gerunt  Christiani ,  quo  discernemur  in 
seternum  a  non  Christianis.  Vaticinium  ha¬ 


betur  Isai.  LXVI.  ubi  loquens  Dominus  de 
vocatione  gentium  :  Omnes  gentes ,  inquit, 
et  linguae  venient ,  et  videbunt  gloriam  meam, 
et  ponam  in  eis  signum  etc.  (4)  Quamvis  enim 
per  hoc  signum  possit  intclligi  signum  cru¬ 
cis,  aut  aliquid  aliud,  tamen  nihil  repugnat 
si  dicamus  intelligi  characterem  :  praesertim 
cum  videamus  Paulum  loqui  de  signo  quo¬ 
dam  spirituali  interno,  et  oporteat  Scriptu¬ 
ram  exponere  per  Scripturam ,  cum  id  £eri 
potest. 

Aliqui  addunt  aliam  figuram  exExod.XII. 
ubi  signantur  postes,  et  superliminaria  san¬ 
guine  agni,  et  vaticinium  Ezech.  IX  :  Signa 
Thau  in  frontibus  gementium,  et  dolentium  (o). 
Sed  luec  loca  non  sunt  ad  rem.  Nam  expo¬ 
nuntur  a  Patribus  de  signo  crucis  ,  quod  in¬ 
scribitur  in  fronte,  et  recte  :  nam  Ezechiel 
nominat  frontem,  et  idem  significat  superli¬ 
minare,  quod  est  in  porta  domus  id  ,  quod 
est  frons  in  homine.  Unde  etiam  in  Apoc. 
VII.  ubi  habetur  similis  obsignatio  ,  etiam 
nominatur  frons,  donec  signemus  servos  Dei 
nostri  in  frontibus  eorum.  Et  prieterea  in 
utroque  loco  dicuntur  salvari  omnes  signati, 
et  nulli  non  signati  salvari  :  quod  certe  non 
convenit  characteri ;  multi  enim  cum  cha¬ 
ractere  damnabuntur  ,  et  multi  sine  cha¬ 
ractere  salvabuntur.  At  omnes  salvantur, 
qui  signantur  Christi  cruce  sanguine,  id  est, 
quibus  applicatur  meritum  crucifixi ,  cujus 
figura  est  signum  crucis ;  et  nulli  salvantur 
quibus  hoc  meritum  non  applicatur.  Vide 
de  his  locis  Cyprianum  tract.  contra  Deme- 
trianum.  Hieronymum  in  cap.  IX  Ezechiel. 
Gaudentium  tract.  5.  in  Exodum.
← Chapter 19Chapter 21 →