Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis · On the Ecclesiastical Writers

Chapter 5: The Second Century and the Early Third: Justin to Julius Africanus

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. XII, De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis, of the New Testament, second and third centuries. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

The second century, from the year 100 to 200

St. Justin Martyr. 150

After the Apostolic times the first of those whose writings have come down to us seems to be St. Justin, Philosopher and Martyr. For he flourished in the times of Antoninus Pius and of his successors Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus; and in the Apology to the emperor and the senate and the Roman people he writes that at that time 150 years were counted from the birth of Christ [“50” printed; the heading has 150]. Many works of his are listed by Eusebius, History book 4, chapter 17 [18], and by St. Jerome in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers, some of which are not extant; and some also are extant of which they make no mention. These, then, are the works of Justin now carried about:

The Dialogue with Trypho the Jew, held at Ephesus
The Apology to the Roman senate
The other Apology, to the emperor Antoninus Pius
The Exhortation to the Gentiles
On Monarchy
The Exposition of the Faith, or On the Right Confession
The Letter to Zenas and Serenus
Questions put to the Gentiles, with the Gentiles' answers and their refutation
Questions of the Gentiles put to the Christians, with the answers
The Refutation of certain Dogmas of Aristotle

Of the first five books, which Eusebius and Jerome mention, it seems there can be no doubt. But one must know that the first Apology, as we have it in our books, is in fact the later, and was not given to the senate, as our books have it, but to Marcus and Lucius, the successors of the emperor Pius, as is plainly gathered from Eusebius and Jerome in the places cited. Our people were misled because the first apology lacks its beginning, and so it could not be known to whom it was addressed. The book on the Exposition of the Faith, or on the Confession of the Right Faith, whoever's it is, is a notable book and worthy of Justin as author. Yet I doubt whether it is his: first, because the ancients do not mention it; second, because the style seems different from Justin's; third, because it discourses much more openly and distinctly of the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation than the writers of that century are wont to do. Of the letter to Zenas and Serenus I judge the same. Of the book of the questions put to the Gentiles by Christians it can easily be judged that it is not Justin's, because mention is often made in it of the Manichees, who it is certain arose after Justin's death. The same judgement can be made of the 146 questions which the Gentiles put to the Christians; for in questions 82 and 86 Origen is cited, and in question 115 Irenaeus is cited and called Martyr, although Justin was more ancient than both; for Irenaeus himself in book 5 brings in Justin Martyr as older than himself. Of the refutation of the dogmas of Aristotle Photius makes mention in the Library, and there is no evident sign of falsity; so I have nothing to say.

Melito. 150

St. Melito, Bishop of Sardis, flourished in the time of the emperor M. Aurelius, to whom he also offered an Apology for the Christians, as Eusebius relates, History book 4, chapter 25 [26]. He wrote many things, fragments of which are extant in Eusebius in the place noted. Among these fragments is contained a catalogue of the books of the old Testament, in which the book of Wisdom is attributed to Solomon; and this is the only book listed by Melito of those not found in the Hebrew codices; as also the book of Esther alone is left out of those that are in the Hebrew. There is attributed to Melito also a book on the Passing of the Blessed Virgin, which is extant in volume 7 of the Library of the Holy Fathers, second edition; but it is a book unworthy to be attributed to so great a man.

Athenagoras. 155

Athenagoras was a contemporary of Justin, and wrote a notable apology for the Christians and offered it to the emperors Marcus Aurelius Antoninus and Aurelius Commodus; which St. Epiphanius cites under the name of Athenagoras in the heresy of Origen, where he gives the words of Proclus from Methodius. He wrote also a book on the resurrection. Both works are extant in volume 9 of the Library of the Holy Fathers, second edition, and are free of suspicion. It is strange why Eusebius, a most diligent searcher of writers, did not mention this author. That St. Jerome left this writer out is not so strange, since it is well enough known that St. Jerome's catalogue is taken from the history of Eusebius as regards the writers who came before Eusebius.

St. Theophilus. 170

St. Theophilus, Bishop of Antioch, sixth from the Apostle Peter, lived in the time of the emperor M. Aurelius and died under Commodus his son, on the witness of Eusebius in the Chronicle. He wrote many things, on the witness of St. Jerome in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers; but now there are extant, in volume 1 of the Library of the Holy Fathers, second edition, commentaries on the four Gospels, and three books to Autolycus against the slanderers of the Christian religion.

Tatian. 170

Tatian, a hearer of St. Justin, wrote countless volumes, of which (says St. Jerome, On Ecclesiastical Writers) one most flourishing book against the Gentiles is extant, which was lately found and published in volume 4 of the Library of the Holy Fathers, second edition. Further, Tatian after the martyrdom of St. Justin fell away from the Catholic faith and, lifted up with pride, became a heresiarch.

Hegesippus. 177

Hegesippus was a contemporary of Justin and Athenagoras, as is plain from Eusebius, History book 4, chapter 21 [22], and St. Jerome in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers. He wrote a history of the Church up to his own times, that is, up to the pontificate of Anicetus. Eusebius and St. Jerome mention this history in the places cited, in which fragments of the same history are read. It is not extant now. [“Nunc exstat”, it is extant now, as printed; the sense requires “non exstat”.] The books on the destruction of Jerusalem that are carried about under the name of Hegesippus are either of another, more recent Hegesippus, or forged. Certainly from book 3, chapter 5, it is gathered that those books were written after the times of Constantine.

St. Irenaeus. 180

St. Irenaeus, Bishop and martyr, lived under the emperor Commodus and the Pontiff Eleutherius, and completed his martyrdom in the time of the emperor Severus. He wrote many things; but nothing has come down to us except the five books against Valentinus, which are full of learning and piety. Some doubt whether he wrote in Greek or in Latin, since his books are found only written in Latin; and yet he was a Greek by nation, and a disciple of St. Polycarp, and his phrasing savours of Greek. St. Jerome, book 11 on Ezechiel, explaining chapter 36 of Ezechiel, openly numbers Irenaeus among the Greek writers; and in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers, under Tertullian, he says that Tertullian was the first of the Latins after Apollonius and Victor, both of whom are later than Irenaeus.

The third century, from the year 200 to 300

Tertullian. 203

Tertullian flourished in the time of the emperor Severus, as he himself testifies in book 1 against Marcion, in the Apology, chapter 4, and elsewhere. At first a Catholic of most ardent zeal, then fallen into the heresy of Montanus, he wrote not a few things against the Church. So the undoubted works of Tertullian are these (the cross marks those written against the Church, as explained below; several book counts read “4” in the scan, where “1” is meant):

On Patience, 1 book
On the Flesh of Christ, 1
On the Resurrection of the Flesh, 1
On the Prescription against Heretics, 1
Against the Jews, 1
Against Marcion, 5
Against the Valentinians, 1
Against Hermogenes, 1
Against Praxeas, 1
On the Soldier's Crown, 1
To the Martyrs, 1
On Penance, 1
On the Veiling of Virgins, 1
On Women's Dress, 1
On the Adornment of Women, 1
To his Wife, 2
† On Flight in Persecution, 1
To Scapula, 1
On the Testimony of the Soul, 1
On the Soul, 1
† On the Exhortation to Chastity, 1
† On Monogamy, 1
On Baptism, 1
On the Pallium, 1
On Idolatry, 1
† On Modesty, 1
† On Fasting, against the Psychics, 1
The Scorpiace, against the Gnostics, 1
On Prayer, 1
On the Shows, 1
The Apology against the Gentiles, 1

Of these books St. Jerome, in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers, says that those written against the Church by Tertullian when he was already a heretic are the book On Flight in Persecution, On the Exhortation to Chastity, On Monogamy, On Modesty, On Fasting; to which we have added a cross. Of the book On Prayer St. Hilary, on Matthew chapter 5, writes that it is a most fitting volume, but that the later error of the author took away authority from his worthy writings.

Doubtful or forged works of Tertullian. On the Trinity, 1 book. The letter On Jewish Foods. Of the book On the Trinity St. Jerome and Rufinus disagree. For the latter, in the Apology for Origen, writes that the book On the Trinity, Tertullian's, was joined by heretics with the works of St. Cyprian so as to deceive the unwary. But the former, in the second book against Rufinus, on the contrary asserts that that book On the Trinity is not Tertullian's but Novatian's. The same St. Jerome too, in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers, under Novatian, writes that Novatian wrote a great volume On the Trinity as it were an epitome of Tertullian's work; where he plainly signifies that Tertullian too wrote on the Trinity, of whose book Novatian published an epitome. But whatever may be of this, I think it cannot be doubted that the book On the Trinity now extant among the works of Tertullian is not Tertullian's. For in that book the Sabellian heresy is refuted by name; and Sabellius appeared after the times of Tertullian and falls in the times of Novatian, as is known from the letter of Dionysius of Alexandria in Eusebius, History book 7, chapter 5 [6]. Add that the style (as St. Jerome too noted) plainly cries out that that book is not Tertullian's. The book, or letter, On Jewish Foods does not seem to have Tertullian's style, and seems to have been sent by some Bishop to his own flock; but Tertullian was not a Bishop. Meanwhile, however, I define nothing, but put the causes for doubting before the reader. This last seems to need adding: that the books of Tertullian are to be read with judgement; not only those which, on St. Jerome's witness, he wrote properly against the Church, but also the book against Praxeas, the book On the Soul, the book against Hermogenes, the book On the Flesh of Christ, and the book On Penance. For in these not a few propositions occur that are either erroneous or certainly suspect.

Clement of Alexandria. 204

Clement, Presbyter of the Church of Alexandria, a most learned man, the disciple of Pantaenus and the master of Origen, lived under the emperor Severus, as he himself testifies in Stromata book 1; for there he brings the times of the emperors down to the death of Commodus, whom Severus succeeded after the very short rule of Pertinax and Julian. He wrote many things, which Eusebius mentions, History book 5, chapter 11, and St. Jerome On Ecclesiastical Writers. These works now survive: the eight books of the Stromata; the three books of the Instructor; the Exhortation to the Gentiles. Nor is there any doubt of these. Cassiodorus, Divine Institutions book 1, mentions an explanation by Clement of Alexandria on the canonical letters; whether it is the one found in the Library of the Holy Fathers I cannot easily judge. There are not lacking in this notable author some sayings that savour of error, which we have noted in our books of Controversies, and for which Pope Gelasius, in a certain Roman Council, put the little works of this Clement among the apocrypha. But whether those sayings were inserted by heretics, as some piously believe, or fell from the author in the human way, we do not know.

Minucius Felix. 206

Minucius Felix, a contemporary of Tertullian, wrote a dialogue between the Christian Octavius and the heathen Caecilius, which dialogue is entitled Octavius; and hence it came about, since the author was unknown, that it was joined to the seven books of Arnobius against the Gentiles as if an eighth. But in truth it is not the eighth book of Arnobius, but the Octavius of Minucius Felix, a notable Roman advocate, as St. Jerome testifies in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers.

St. Hippolytus, Bishop and Martyr. 220

St. Hippolytus, Bishop of Portus and Martyr, a disciple of Clement of Alexandria, completed his martyrdom under Alexander Severus. He wrote many things, which are listed by Eusebius, History book 6, chapter 16 [22], and by St. Jerome in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers. Now there are extant only certain excerpts from the books of St. Hippolytus on Theology and the Incarnation, in Henricus Canisius, volume 5 of the Ancient Readings; and also, in the Library of the Holy Fathers, the Oration on the end of the world, on Antichrist, and on the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Let the reader consult the notes of Cardinal Baronius on the martyrology for the 22nd of August.

Julius Africanus. 222

Julius Africanus seems to have been a little older than Origen, since in the letter to Origen he calls him son. He wrote a book on the times from the beginning of the world to the emperor Macrinus, under whom he lived; and he undertook an embassy to M. Antoninus Heliogabalus, as St. Jerome testifies in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers. But these books have perished, though they were extant in the time of Photius, as he himself writes in the Library. At this time only the letter to Origen on the history of Susanna is extant, which he contends is fabulous; to which Origen answered, showing that it is true. The letter of Julius Africanus is extant in the second volume of Origen's works.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
SICULUM  SECUNDUM  AB  ANNO  !  00.  AD  200. 
De  S.  Justino  Martyre.  150. 
Post  Apostolica  tempora  primus  eorum, 
quorum  scripta  ad  nos  pervenerunt,  videtur 
esse  sanctus  Justinus  Philosophus  et  Martyr. 
Floruit  enim  temporibus  Antonini  Pii,  et 
successorum  ejus  Marci  Aurelii  etLucii  Veri; 
et  in  Apologia  ad  imp.  et  senatum,  popu¬ 
lumque  Romanum,  scribit,  numerari  eo  tem¬ 
pore  annos.  50.  a  Christi  nativitate. 
Opera  ejus  multa  recensentur  ab  Eusebio 
lib.  iv.  hist.  cap.  17.  et  a  Sancto  Hieronymo 
in  lib.  descript.  Eccles.,  quorum  operum  non 
exstant,  et  quaedam  etiam  exstant,  quorum 
illi  non  meminerunt.  Haec  igitur  Justini  ope¬ 
ra  nunc  feruntur  : 
362 
DE  SCRIPTORIBUS  ECCLESIASTICIS 
Dialogus  cum  Tryphone  Judaeo  Ephesi 
habitus. 
Apologia  ad  senatum  Romanum. 
Apologia  altera  ad  imp.  Antonium*Pium. 
Oratio  pareenetica  ad  gentes. 
De  monarchia. 
Expositio  fidei  sive  de  recta  confessione. 
Epistola  ad  Zenam  et  Serenum. 
Interrogationes,  sive  quaestiones  positae 
gentibus,  et  gentium  ad  eas  responsiones, 
earumque  refutationes. 
Interrogationes,  sive  quaestiones  gentium 
positae  Christianis,  et  ad  eas  responsiones. 
Refutatio  quorumdam  Aristotelis  dogma¬ 
tum. 
Et  quidem  de  primis  quinque  libris,  quo¬ 
rum  Eusebius  et  Hieronymus  meminerunt, 
non  videtur  posse  dubitari.  Sciendum  est 
autem,  Apologiam  priorem,  ut  in  nostris 
libris  habemus,  reipsa  esse  posteriorem,  et 
non  ad  senatum  datam,  ut  nostri  libri  ha¬ 
bent,  sed  ad  Marcum  et  Lucium  imperato¬ 
ris  Pii  successores,  ut  aperte  colligitur  ex 
Eusebio  et  Hieronymo  locis  citatis  :  sed  fe¬ 
fellit  nostros,  quia  apologia  prior  Garet  ini¬ 
tio,  et  ideo  non  potuit  cognosci  ad  quem, 
vel  ad  quos  directa  esset. 
Liber  de  expositione  fidei,  sive  de  confes¬ 
sione  rectae  fidei,  cujuscumque  sit,  insignis 
liber  est,  et  Justino  auctore  dignus.  Ambigo 
tamen  an  ejus  sit :  primo,  quia  veteres  ejus 
non  meminerunt  :  secundo,  quia  stylus  vi¬ 
detur,  esse  diversus  a  stylo  Justini :  tertio, 
quoniam  multo  apertius  et  distinctius  disse¬ 
rit  de  mysteriis  Trinitatis,  et  Incarnationis, 
quam  scriptores  ejus  saeculi  facere  soleant. 
De  epistola  ad  Zenam  et  Serenum  id- 
ipsum  censeo. 
De  libro  quaestionum  quinque  gentibus  a 
Christianis  positarum,  facile  judicari  potest, 
eum  librum  non  esse  Justini,  quod  in  eo 
saepe  fiat  mentio  Manichaeorum,  quos  post 
mortem  Justini  exortos  esse  constat.  Idem 
judicium  fieri  potest  de  quaestionibus  146. 
quas  gentes  Christianis  posuerunt  :  nam 
quaest.  82.  et  86.  citatur  Origenes,  et  quaest. 
115.  citatur  Irenaeus,  et  Martyr  appellatur  : 
cum  tamen  Justinus  utroque  antiquior  fue¬ 
rit  :  nam  ipse  etiam  Irenaeps  lib.  v.  Justi¬ 
num  Martyrem  adducit,  tamquam  se  anti¬ 
quiorem. 
De  reprehensione  dogmatum  Aristotelis, 
meminit  Photius  in  bibliotheca ;  neque  ex¬ 
stat  evidens  indicium  falsitatis;  ideo  nihil 
habeo  quod  dicam. 
De  Melitone.  150. 
Sanctus  Melito  Sardensis  Episcopus  M. 
Aurelii  imp.  tempore  floruit;  cui  etiam  Apo¬ 
logiam  pro  Christianis  obtulit,  ut  refert  Eu¬ 
sebius  lib.  iv.  hist.  cap.  25.  Multa  scripsit, 
quorum  fragmenta  exstant  apud  Eusebium 
loco  notato.  Inter  quae  fragmenta  continetur 
catalogus  librorum  Testamenti  veteris,  in 
quo  liber  Sapientiae  tribuitur  Salomoni  :  et 
hic  solus  liber  recensetur  a  Melitone  ex  iis 
qui  in  Hebraicis  codicibus  non  habentur :  ut 
etiam  solus  liber  Esther  omittitur  ex  iis  qui 
sunt  in  Hebraeo. 
Tribuitur  etiam  Melitoni  liber  de  transitu 
B.  Yirginis,  qni  exstat  in  vn.  tomo  biblio¬ 
thecae  sanctorum  Patrum,  edit.  2., sed  indi¬ 
gnus  liber  est,  qui  tanto  viro  tribuatur. 
De  Athenagora.  155. 
Athenagoras  aequalis  Justini  fuit,  et  insi¬ 
gnem  apolegiam  pro  Christianis  scripsit,  et 
impp.  Marco  Aurelio  Antonino  et  Aurelio 
Commodo  obtulit  :  quam  sub  nomine  Athe¬ 
nagorae  citat  Sanctus  Epiphanius  in  haeresi 
Origenis,  ubi  refert  verba  Procli  exMethodio. 
Scripsit  etiam  librum  de  resurrectione  : 
utrumque  opus  exstat  tomo  ix.  bibliothecae 
sanctorum  Patrum,  edit.  2.  et  suspicione 
caret.  Mirum  autem  est,  cur  Eusebius  dili- 
gentissimus  scriptorum  investigator,  hujus 
auctoris  non  meminerit. 
Quod  autem  Sanctus  Hieronymus  hunc 
scriptorem  omiserit  non  est  adeo  mirum, 
cum  satis  constet,  catalogum  Sancti  Hiero¬ 
nymi,  ex  historia  Eusebii  esse  desumptum, 
quoad  illos  scriptores,  qui  Eusebium  prae¬ 
cesserunt. 
De  S.  Theophilo.  170. 
Sanctus  Theophilus  Episcopus  Antioche¬ 
nus,  sextus  ab  Apostolo  Petro  vixit  tempore 
M.  Aurellii  imp.  et  sub  Commodo  ejus  filio 
obiit,  teste  Eusebio  in  chronico.  Scripsit 
multa,  teste  S.  Hieronymo  lib.  de  script. 
Eccles.,  sed  nunc  exstant  in  I.  tomo  biblio¬ 
thecae  sanctorum  Patrum  secundae  editionis, 
commentaria  in  quatuor  Evangelia  ;  et  libri 
tres  ad  Autolycum  adversus  Christianae  reli¬ 
gionis  calumniatores. 
AB  ANNO  DOM.  200.  AD  300. 
363 
De  Tatiano.  170. 
Tatianus  Sancti  Justini  auditor,  scripsit 
infinita  volumina,  ex  quibus  (inquit  Sanctus 
Hieronymus  de  script.  Eccles.)  unus  contra 
gentiles  florentissimus  exstat  liber,  qui  nu¬ 
per  est  inventus,  et  editus  in  quarto  tomo 
bibliothecae  sanctorum  Patrum  secundae 
editionis.  Porro  Tatianns  post  martyrium 
sancti  Justini  a  fide  Catholica  defecit,  et  in 
superbiam  elatus  haeresiarcha  factus  est. 
De  Hegesippo.  177. 
Hegesippus  aequalis  Justini  et  Athenagorae 
fuit  ut  ex  Eusebio  lib.  iv.  hist.  cap.  21.  et 
Sancto  Hieronymo  in  lib.  de  script.  Eccles. 
perspicuum  est.  Scripsit  historiam  Eccle¬ 
siasticam  usque  ad  sua  tempora,  id  est,  us¬ 
que  ad  Anicetti  pontificatum.  Hujus  histo¬ 
riae  meminerunt  Eusebius  et  Sanctus  Hiero¬ 
nymus  locis  citatis,  in  quibus  fragmenta  hi¬ 
storiae  ejusdem  leguntur.  Nunc  exstat.  Libri 
vero  de  excidio  Hierosolymae,  qui  sub  no¬ 
mine  Hegesippi  circumferuntur;  aut  alterius 
Hegesippi  recentioris ;  aut  suppositii  sunt. 
Certe  ex  lib.  tertio,  cap.  5.  colligitur,  post 
Constantini  tempora  libros  illos  fuisse  con¬ 
scriptos. 
De  Sancto  Irenaeo.  180. 
Sanctus  Irenaeus  Episcopus  et  martyr, 
Commodo  imperatore  etEleuthero  Pontifice 
vixit  :  et  tempore  Severi  imp.  martyrium 
consummavit ,  scripsit  multa ;  sed  ad  nos 
non  pervenerunt,  nisi  quinque  libri  adver¬ 
sus  Valentinum,  qui  pleni  sunt  doctrina  et 
pietate.  Ambigunt  nonnulli,  graecene  an 
latine  scripserit;  quoniam  non  inveniuntur 
ejus  libri,  nisi  latine  conscripti  :  et  tamen 
ipse  natione  Graecus  erat,  et  Sancti  Poly- 
carpi  discipulus,  et  phrasis  ejus  graecismum 
redolet.  Sanctus  Hieronymus  lib.  xi.  in  Eze- 
chielem  explanans  caput  xxxvi.  Ezechielis  , 
aperte  Irenaeum  inter  scriptores  Graecos  nu¬ 
merat  :  et  in  lib.  de  script.  Eccles.  in  Ter¬ 
tulliano  ,  dicit,  Tertullianum  esse  primum 
Latinorum  post  Apollonium,  et  Victorem, 
quorum  uterque  Ireneeo  posterior  est. 
SUCULUM  TERTIUM  AB  ANNO  200.  AD  300. 
De  Tertulliano.  203. 
Tertullianus  tempore  Severi  imperatoris 
floruit,  ut  ipse  testatur  lib.  i.  in  Marcionem, 
in  Apologetico  cap.  4.  et  alibi.  Initio  Catho¬ 
licus  ardentissimi  zeli,  deinde  in  Montani 
haeresim  prolapsus  contra  Ecclesiam  non 
pauca  scripsit.  Ergo  opera  Tertulliani  indu¬ 
bitata  sunt. 
De  patientia,  lib.  4 
De  carne  Christi,  1 
De  resurrectione  carnis,  1 
De  praescriptionibus  adversus  Haereticos,  1 
Adversus  Judaeos,  i 
Adversus  Marcionem,  5 
Adversus  Valentinianos,  i 
Adversus  Hermogenem,  1 
Adversus  Praxeam,  1 
De  corona  militis,  1 
Ad  Martyres,  4 
De  poenitentia,  i 
De  virginibus  velandis,  1 
De  habitu  muliebri,  1 
De  cultu  feminarum,  1 
Ad  uxorem  suam,  2 
-J-  De  fuga  in  persecutione,  1 
Ad  scapulam,  1 
De  testimonio  animae,  1 
De  anima,  1 
-j-  De  exhortatione  castitatis,  4 
-j-  De  Monogamia,  1 
De  Baptismo,  1 
De  pallio,  1 
De  idololatria,  1 
*j-  De  pudicitia,  1 
-j-  De  jejunio  adversus  Psychicos,  4 
Scorpiacum  contra  Gnosticos,  1 
De  oratione,  1 
De  spectaculis,  1 
Apologeticus  adversus  gentes,  l 
Ex  his  libris  Sanctus  Hieronymus  in  lib. 
de  script.  Eccl.  dicit,  scriptos  esse  contra 
Ecclesiam  a  Tertulliano  jam  tum  Haeretico, 
librum  de  fuga  in  persecutione,  de  exhorta¬ 
tione  castitatis,  de  monogamia,  de  pudicitia, 
de  jejunio,  quibus  crucem  addidimus.  Li¬ 
brum  de  oratione  scribit  Sanctus  Hilarius  in 
cap.  v.  Matthaei,  esse  volumen  aptissimum, 
sed  consequentem  errorem  auctoris  detra¬ 
xisse  scriptis  probabilibus  auctoritatem. 
364 
DE  SCRIPTORIBUS  ECCLESIASTICIS 
Opera  Tertulliani  dubia ,  vel  supposititia . 
De  Trinitate.  lib.  I. 
De  cibis  Judaicis,  epistola. 
De  libro  de  Trinitate  dissentiunt  Sanctus 
Hieronymus,  et  Ruffinus  :  hic  enim  in  Apo- 
logia  pro  Origene  scribit,  librum  de  Trini¬ 
tate,  Tertulliani,  ab  Haereticis  cum  operibus 
Sancti  Cypriani  conjunctum  fuisse,  ut  falle¬ 
rent  incautos.  Ille  autem  in  secundo  libro 
adversus  Ruffinum  contra  asserit,  librum 
illum  de  Trinitate,  non  esse  Tertulliani,  sed 
Novatiani. 
Idem  etiam  Sanctus  Hieronymus  in  lib. 
de  script.  Eccles.  in  Novatiano,  scribit  No- 
vatianum  scripsisse  grande  volumen  de  Tri¬ 
nitate  quasi  epitomen  operis  Tertulliani.  Ubi 
aperte  significat.  Tertullianum  quoque  scri¬ 
psisse  de  Trinitate,  cujus  libri  epitomen  No- 
vatianus  ediderit.  Sed  quicquid  de  hac  re 
sit,  dubitari  non  posse  existimo  quin  liber  de 
Trinitate,  qui  nunc  exstaj  inter  opera  Ter¬ 
tulliani,  Tertulliani  non  sit :  nam  in  eo  libro 
refutatur  nominatim  Sabelliana  haeresis.  Sa- 
bellius  autem  post  tempora  Tertulliani  appa¬ 
ruit,  etin  tempera  Novatiani  incidit,  utnotum 
est  ex  epistola  Dionysii  Alexandrini  apud 
Eusebium  lib.  vn.  hist.  cap.  5.  Adde  quod 
stylus  (ut  etiam  Sanctus  Hieronymus  anno¬ 
tavit)  aperte  clamat,  librum  illum  Tertul¬ 
liani  non  esse. 
Liber,  sive  epistola  de  cibis  Judaicis,  non 
videtur  stylum  habere  Tertulliani :  et  videtur 
ab  aliquo  Episcopo  propriae  plebi  transmis¬ 
sus.  Tertullianus  autem  Episcopus  non  fuit. 
Iterim  tamen  nihil  definio,  sed  causas  dubi¬ 
tandi  in  medium  pono.  Illud  postremo  ad¬ 
dendum  videtur,  Tertulliani  libros  cum  ju¬ 
dicio  esse  legendos,  non  eos  tantum,  quos 
S.  Hieronymo  teste,  contra  Ecclesiam  pro¬ 
prie  scripsit ,  sed  etiam  librum  adversus 
Praxeam,  librum  de  anima,  librum  adversus 
Hermogenem,  librum  de  carne  Christi,  et 
librum  de  pcemtentia.  In  his  enim  proposi¬ 
tiones  non  paucae,  vel  erroneae,  vel  cerfe  su¬ 
spectae  occurrunt. 
De  Clemente  Alexandrino.  204. 
Clemens  Alexandrinae  Ecclesiae  Presbyter, 
vir  doctissimus,  Panteni  discipulus,  et  Ori- 
genis  magister,  vixit  sub  Severo  imp.,  ut  ipse 
testatur  lib.  i.  Stromatum.  Ibi  enim  deducit 
tempora  imperatorum  usque  ad  obitum 
Commodi,  cui  severus  successit,  post  bre¬ 
vissimum  imperium  Pertinacis,  et  Juliani. 
Multa  scripsit,  quorum  meminerunt  Euse- 
bius  lib.  v.  hist.  cap.  11.  et  S.  Hieronymus 
de  Script.  Eccles.  Nunc  vero  haec  opera  su¬ 
persunt  : 
Stromatum  libri  octo. 
Paedagogi  libri  tres. 
Oratio  exhortatoria  ad  gentes. 
Neque  de  his  dubitatio  ulla  est.  Meminit 
Cassiodorus  in  lib.  i.  Divinarum  institutio¬ 
num  explanationis  Clementis  Alexandrini  in 
epistolas  canonicas  :  an  ea  sit,  quae  in  biblio¬ 
theca  S.  Patrum  invenitur,  non  facile  judi¬ 
care  possum. 
Non  desunt  in  hoc  insigni  auctore  senten¬ 
tiae  aliquae,  qum  errorem  sapiunt,  quas  in 
libris  nostris  controversiarum  notavimus,  et 
ob  quas  Gelasius  Papa,  in  Concilio  quodam 
Romano ,  Clementis  hujus  opuscula  inter 
apocrypha  retulit.  Utrum  autem  sententiae 
illae  ab  Haereticis  insertae  sint,  ut  aliqui  pie 
credunt,  an  auctori  more  humano  excide¬ 
rint,  ignoramus. 
De  Minutio  Felice.  206. 
Minutius  Felix  Tertulliani  aequalis,  scri¬ 
psit  dialogum  inter  Christinum  Octavium,  et 
Ethnicum  Caecilium,  qui  dialogus,  Octavius 
inscribitur;  atque  inde  factum  est,  cum  au¬ 
ctor  ignoraretur,  ut  septem  libris  Arnobii 
contra  gentes,  hic  veluti  octavus  adjunge¬ 
retur.  Sed  re  vera  non  est  octavus  liber  Ar¬ 
nobii,  sed  Octavius  Minutii  Felicis,  causidici 
Romani,  insignis,  ut  S.  Hieronymus  testatur 
in  lib.  de  script.  Eccles. 
De  S.  Hippolyto  Episcopo ,  et  Martyre  220. 
9 
Sanctus  Hippolytus  Episcopus  Portuensis, 
et  Martyr,  Clementis  Alexandrini  discipulus, 
sub  Alexandro  Severo  martyrum  consum¬ 
mavit. 
Multa  scripsit  quae  enumerantur  ab  Euse- 
bio  lib.  vi.  hist.  cap.  16.  et  a  Sancto  Hiero¬ 
nymo  in  lib.  de  script.  Eccles.  Nane  solum 
extant  excepta  quaedam  ex  libris  S.  Hippo¬ 
lyti  de  Theologia ,  et  Incarnatione,  apud 
Henricum  Canisium  tomo  quinto  antiquae 
lectionis  :  necnon  in  bibliotheca  sanctorum 
Patrum,  Oratio  de  consummatione  mundi, 
de  Antichristo,  et  secundo  adventu  Domini 
nostri  Jesu  Christi. 
AB  ANNO  DOM 
Consulat  lector  notationes  Card.  Baronii  ad 
martyrologium  die  22  Augusti. 
De  Julio  Africano  222. 
Julius  Africanus  paulo  senior  Origene 
fuisse  videtur,  cum  in  epistola  ad  Origenem, 
eum  filium  appellet.  Scripsit  librum  de  tem¬ 
poribus  ab  origine  mundi  usque  ad  Macri¬ 
num  imperatorem,  sub  quo  ipse  vivebat,  et 
ad  M.  Antoninum  Heliogabalum,  legationem 
suscepit,  ut  S.  Hieronymus  testatur  in  lib. 
de  script.  Ecclesiast.  Sed  hi  libri  perierunt, 
cum  tamen  exstarent  tempore  Photii,  ut  ipse 
in  bibliotheca  scribit.  Exstat  hoc  tempore 
solum  epistola  ad  Origenem  de  historia 
Susannse,  quam  fabulosam  esse  contendit  : 
cui  respondit  Origenes,  veram  illam  esse  de¬ 
monstrans.  Epistola  Julii  Africani  exstat  in 
secundo  tomo  operum  Origenis. 
← Chapter 4Chapter 6 →