Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Church Militant · The Church Spread Throughout the Whole World

Chapter 21: The First Mark Is Explained: The Name Catholic

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. II, De Ecclesia Militante, On the Church Militant (of the controversy On Councils and the Church). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

The first Mark is the very name of the Catholic Church and of Christians; for, as Saint Augustine teaches, book against the letter of the foundation, chapter 4, even though every heresy wishes to seem and be called the Catholic Church, yet when the heretics are asked by the pagans where one may assemble to the Catholic Church, no one dares to show his own house. And Cyril, catechesis 18, says: “If thou go into any city, ask not where is the Church or the house of God; for even the heretics say that they have the house of God and the Church; but ask where is the Catholic Church; for this name is proper to this holy Church, the mother of us all”; as if he should say, if thou ask this, no heretic will show his own Church.

Pacian in his letter to Sympronian, which is on the name "Catholic": “Certainly,” he says, “that is not borrowed from man which through so many ages has not fallen. This 'Catholic' sounds neither of Marcion, nor of Apelles, nor of Montanus, nor takes heretics for authors.” And below: “Christian is my name, but Catholic my surname; the one names me, the other shows me.” And in the same place he beautifully says that the name Catholic befits the principal head and trunk of that tree, from which many branches are cut off at various times: for the heretical sects are branches, that is, certain parts cut off from the tree of the Church; but the tree itself, which rests on its own root and always remains the same, and is a whole, is called Catholic. Likewise there is no heresy which does not take its name from some man, its author, and leave the Christian name to those from whom it departs. Thus 1 Corinthians 3 some of the schismatics said, I am of Paul; others, I of Apollo; others, I indeed of Cephas.

Justin in the Dialogue with Trypho: “And they are distinguished by surnames, named from certain men, according as each was the author of some new doctrine. Of these some are called Marcionists, some Valentinians, some Basilidians, some Saturninians, some by another name, each from the first inventor of his dogma.” Irenaeus, Book 1, chapter 20: “They have also names; from Simon, the prince of the most impious opinion, they are called Simonians.” Lactantius, Book 4, chapter 30: “When they are named Marcionists or Arians, they have ceased to be Christians, who, having lost the name of Christ, have put on human and external names.” Athanasius, sermon 2 against the Arians: “Never did the people take a name from their bishops, but from the Lord in whom they believed. Certainly we have not obtained appellations from the blessed Apostles our teachers, but from Christ we are and are called Christians. But those who draw the origin of their faith from elsewhere deservedly bear the surnames of their authors. Wherefore, since from Christ we were all Christians and were so called, Marcion the inventor of the heresy was expelled. But the rest who remained retained the title of Christians; but those who followed Marcion were no longer thence called Christians, but Marcionists. So too Valentinus, Basilides, Manichaeus, and the rest imparted their names to their followers.”

Chrysostom, homily 33 on the Acts of the Apostles: “They have certain men from whom they are named: for as is the name of the heresiarch, so also is the sect called; but to us no man gave a name, but the faith itself.”

Jerome against the Luciferians at the end: “If anywhere you hear those who are called Christians named not from the Lord Jesus Christ, but from some other, as Marcionists, Valentinians, know that it is not the Church of Christ, but the synagogue of Antichrist.” Now, therefore, if some are called Martinists or Lutherans, others Zwinglians, others Calvinists, etc., but no one ever called us from some certain man, it is established that ours alone is the true Church.

But, they say, you are commonly called Papists, Romans, or Romanists. I answer that of old too the Catholics were called Homoousians, but those very names attest to the truth. For they are not the names of some new author and heresiarch, as are their names: but "Homoousian" signifies one who believes the Son consubstantial with the Father, which is a most true dogma. "Papist" is derived from Pope, such as was Peter too, and Christ Himself, as is known; and "Roman" and "Romanist," even more than 1100 years ago, was the same as "Catholic," as is clear from Ambrose in his oration on the death of Satyrus. Add that Chrysostom, homily 33 on the Acts, says that it is not evil if Catholics are named from those who govern the Church in the name of Christ, provided they be not named from some particular man, as the heretics do. Where he seems to have foreseen that we would sometime be called Papists. Add that we are not called Papists except by the Lutherans in Germany and neighboring regions, but we are not so called in Greece, Asia, Africa, the Indies, to omit meanwhile Italy and Spain.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  IV. 

Explicatur  prima  Nota. 

Prima  Nota,  est  ipsum  Catholicae  Ecclesiae 
et  Christianorum  nomen  ;  nam,  utS.  Augus¬ 
tinus  docet  lib.  contra  epist.  fundamenti, 
cap.  4.  etiam  si  omnis  haeresis  velit  videri, 
et  dici  Catholica  Ecclesia,  tamen  cum  inter¬ 
rogantur  haeretici  a  paganis,  ubi  ad  Catholi¬ 
cam  conveniatur?  nemo  audet  domum  suam 
ostendere,  et  Gyrillus  cateches.  18.  dicit  : 
«  Si  iveris  in  aliquam  urbem,  non  petas,  ubi 
sit  Ecclesia,  vel  domus  Dei ;  nam  etiam  hae¬ 
retici  dicunt  se  habere  domum  Dei,  et  Ec¬ 
clesiam,  sed  petas,  ubi  sit  Catholica  Eccle¬ 
sia;  id  enim  nomen  proprium  est  hujus  sanc¬ 
tae  Ecclesiae  matris  omnium  nostrum ;  quasi 
dicat,  si  hoc  petas  ,  nullus  haereticus  suam 
Ecclesiam  ostendet.  » 

Pacianus  in  epistola  ad  Sympronianum, 
quae  est  de  nomine  Catholico  :  «  Certe ,  in¬ 
quit,  non  est  ab  homine  mutuatum,  quod 
per  saecula  tanta  non  cecidit.  Catholicum 
istud,  nec  Marcionem,  nec  Apellem,  nec 


Montanum  sonat,  nec  haereticos  sumit  auc¬ 
tores.  »  Et  infra  :  «  Christianus  mihi  nomen 
est,  Catholicus  vero  cognomen  ;  illud  me 
nuncupat,  istud  ostendit.  »  Et  ibidem  pul¬ 
chre  dicit,  nomen  Catholicum  convenire  ca¬ 
piti  principali,  et  trunco  illius  arboris,  unde 
multi  rami  variis  temporibus  excinduntur: 
sectae  enim  haereticae  sunt  rami,  id  est,  par¬ 
tes  quaedam  ab  arbore  Ecclesiae  praecisae ; 
ipsa  autem  arbor,  quae  sua  radice  nititur,  et 
semper  eadem  manet,  et  est  quid  totum,  Ca¬ 
tholica  dicitur.  Similiter  nulla  est  haeresis, 
quae  non  accipiat  nomen  ab  aliquo  homine 
auctore  suo,  et  nomen  Christianum  iis  relin¬ 
quat  ,  a  quibus  discedit.  Sic  I.  Corinth.  III 
schismaticorum  alii  dicebant :  Ego  sum  Pau¬ 
li,  alii,  ego  Apollo,  alii  ego  vero  Cephee  (I). 

Justinus  in  Triphone  :  «  Et  sunt,  inquit, 
distincti  cognominibus,  denominati  a  quibus¬ 
dam  viris,  ut  quisque  fuit  auctor  alicujus 
novae  doctrinae.  Ex  iis  alii  vocantur  Marcio- 
nistae,  alii  Valentiniani,  alii  Basilidiani,  alii 
Saturniniani,  alii  alio  vocabulo,  quisque  a 
primo  inventore  sui  dogmatis.  »  Irenaeusl.  I, 
cap.  20  :  «  Habent,  inquit,  et  vocabula,  a 
principe  impiissimae  sententiae  Simone  dicti 
Simoniani.  »  Lactantius  lib.  IV,  cap.  30.  : 
«  Cum  Marcionistae  aut  Ariani  nominantur, 
Christiani  esse  desierunt,  qui  Christi  nomine 
amisso,  humana  et  externa  vocabula  indue¬ 
runt.  »  Athanasius  serm.  2.  contra  Arianos  : 
«  Numquam,  inquit,  populus  ab  Episcopis 
suis,  sed  a  Domino,  in  quem  creditum  fuit, 
nomen  accepit.  Certe  abeatis  Apostolis  prae¬ 
ceptoribus  nostris  appellationes  adepti  non 
sumus,  sed  a  Christo  Christiani  sumus,  et 
nuncupamur.  Illi  vero  qui  aliunde  originem 
suae  fidei  deducunt ,  merito  auctorum  suo¬ 
rum  cognomenta  prae  se  ferunt.  Quapropter 
cum  a  Christo  omnes  Christiani  essemus,  et 
diceremur,  explosus  est  Marcion  inventor 
haereseos.  Reliqui  autem  qui  remanserunt 
Christiani  titulum  retinuerunt  ;  qui  vero 
Marcionem  secuti  sunt,  non  jam  inde  Chris¬ 
tiani,  sed  Marcionistae  appellati  sunt.  Ita 
quoque  Valentinus,  Basilides,  Manichaeus 
et  caeteri  sectatoribus  suis  nomina  impertie¬ 
runt.  » 

Chrysostomus  hornil.  33.  in  acta  Aposto¬ 
lorum  :  «  Illi  habent  quosdam  a  quibus  ap¬ 
pellantur  :  prout  enim  haeresiarchae  nomen, 
ita  et  secta  vocatur,  nobis  autem  nullus  vir 
nomen  dedit,  sed  fides  ipsa.  » 


(1)  I.  Cor.  III,  4. 


CAPUT  V. 


367 


Hieronymus  contra  Luciferianos  in  fine  : 
«  Sicubi  audietis  eos,  qui  dicuntur  Christia¬ 
ni,  non  a  Domino  Jesu  Christo,  sed  a  quo¬ 
quo  alio  nuncupari,  ut  Mareionistas,  Valen- 
tinianos ;  scito  non  Ecclesiam  Christi,  sed 
Antichristi  esse  Synagogam.  »  Jam  ergo  si 
nunc  dicuntur  alii  Martinistee,  vel  Lutherani, 
alii  Zwingliani,  alii  Calvinistse,  etc.  nos  au¬ 
tem  ab  aliquo  certo  homine  nemo  unquam 
vocavit,  constat  nostram  solum  esse  veram 
Ecclesiam. 

At,  inquiunt,  vos  vocamini  passim,  Papis- 
tse,  Romani,  vel  Romanenses.  Respondeo, 
etiam  olim  fuisse  vocatos  Catholicos  homou- 
sianos,  sed  ista  ipsa  nomina  veritati  attes¬ 
tantur.  Non  enim  sunt  nomina  alicujus  novi 
auctoris,  et  hajresiarcliee,  ut  sunt  ipsorum 
nomina  :  sed  homousianus  significat  eum, 
qui  credit  Filium  Patri  consubstantialem, 
quod  est  dogma  verissimum.  Papista  dedu¬ 
citur  a  Papa,  qualis  fuit  etiam  Petrus,  et 
Christus  ipse,  ut  notum  est,  Romanus  au¬ 
tem,  et  Romanensis,  etiam  ante  1100  annos 
idem  erat,  quod  Catholicus,  ut  patet  ex  Am¬ 
brosio  in  oratione  de  obitu  Satyri.  Adde, 
quod  Ghrysostomus  hom.  33.  in  acta  dicit, 
non  esse  malum  si  Catholici  denominentur 
ab  iis,  qui  Ecclesiam  gubernant  nomine 
Christi,  modo  non  denominentur  ab  aliquo 
homine  particulari,  sicut  haeretici  faciunt. 
Ubi  videtur  praevidisse  nos  vocandos  quan¬ 
doque  Papistas.  Adde,  quod  non  vocamur 
Papistae,  nisi  a  Lutheranis  in  Germania,  et 
vicinis  regionibus,  non  sic  autem  vocamur 
in  Graecia,  Asia,  Africa,  Indiis ,  ut  interim 
omittam  Italiam,  et  Hispaniam.
← Chapter 20Chapter 22 →