Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On the Church Militant · The Church Spread Throughout the Whole World

Chapter 20: The True Marks of the Church Are Proposed

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. II, De Ecclesia Militante, On the Church Militant (of the controversy On Councils and the Church). The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

These marks, therefore, being briefly refuted, it remains that we propose the true marks. But it is first to be observed that the Catholic Church is as it were a certain sun which diffuses most clear rays of light on every side, so that by them it can most easily be known. For it has very many marks, or testimonies and signs, which distinguish it from every false religion of Pagans, Jews, and heretics: and these indeed do not make it evidently true that it is the true Church of God, but yet make this evidently credible; for it is not the same to be evidently true and evidently credible. For that is called evidently true which is seen either in itself or in its principles; that is called evidently credible which is seen neither in itself nor in its principles, yet has so many and so grave testimonies that any wise man ought deservedly to believe it. As if a judge see a man slain by a robber, or wounded mortally and afterward dying, he has the evidence of truth that that robber is a murderer; but if he do not see the slaying done, but have twenty most grave witnesses who say they saw it, he has the evidence of credibility.

We say, therefore, that the marks of the Church which we shall bring forward do not make the evidence of truth simply, because otherwise none would be found who would deny it, just as no one is found who denies the propositions which the mathematicians demonstrate; but yet they make the evidence of credibility, according to that of Psalm 92: Thy testimonies are become exceedingly credible. But among those who admit the divine Scriptures and histories and the writings of the ancient Fathers, they make also the evidence of truth. For although the truth of the articles of faith cannot be evident to us absolutely, yet it can be evident hypothetically, that is, the truth of the Scriptures being supposed. For that which is evidently deduced from Scripture is evidently true, the Scriptures being supposed.

Further, these marks are variously named and numbered by various writers. Blessed Augustine, book against the letter of the foundation, chapter 4, sets six marks. Blessed Jerome against the Luciferians at the end, two. Vincent in his Commonitory, three.

Of the more recent, Driedo, Book 4, chapter 2, part 2 on ecclesiastical dogmas, and Peter of Soto, first part of the Defense, chapter 44 and following, three others. Cardinal Hosius, in the explanation of the Creed, four. Nicholas Sanders, Book 8 on the visible monarchy, chapter 50, another six. Michael Medina, Book 2 on right faith, sets ten, and Book 7, chapter 26, adds an eleventh. Gunerus Petri, in his little book on the marks of the Church, sets (if I am not mistaken) twelve; for when we wrote these things, we had not his book in hand.

We shall propose fifteen Marks, which, if anyone wishes, can in some way be reduced to those four which are commonly assigned by the more recent from the Constantinopolitan Creed: One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  III. 

Proponuntur  verce  Notce  Ecclesice. 

Ilis  igitur  notis  breviter  refutatis,  restat  ut 
veras  notas  proponamus.  Est  autem  initio 
observandum,  Ecclesiam  Catholicam  esse 
quasi  solem  quemdam,  qui  radios  lucis  cla¬ 
rissimos  ex  omni  parte  diffundit,  ut  facillime 
per  eos  cognosci  possit.  Habet  enim  pluri¬ 
mas  notas,  sive  testimonia,  ac  signa,  quae 
eam  discernunt  ab  omni  falsa  religione  Pa¬ 
ganorum,  Judaeorum,  Haereticorum  :  et  non 
quidem  efficiunt  evidenter  verum,  ipsam 
esse  veram  Dei  Ecclesiam ;  sed  tamen  effi¬ 
ciunt  id  evidenter  credibile ;  nec  enim  est 
idem  evidenter  credibile ;  nec  enim  est  idem 
evidenter  verum,  et  evidenter  credibile.  Nam> 
evidenter  verum  dicitur,  quod  vel  in  se,  vel 
in  suis  principiis  videtur ;  evidenter  credibile 
illud  dicitur,  quod  non  videtur  nec  in  se, 
nec  in  suis  principiis,  habet  tamen  tot,  et 
tam  gravia  testimonia,  ut  quilibet  vir  sapiens 
merito  id  credere  debeat ;  ut  si  judex  videat 
hominem  a  latrone  occidi,  vel  vulnerari  Ise— 
thaliter,  et  postea  mori,  habet  evidentiam 
veritatis,  quod  ille  latro  sit  homicida;  si  au¬ 
tem  caedem  fieri  non  videat,  sed  habeat  vi- 
ginti  testes  viros  gravissimos,  qui  dicunt  se 
vidisse,  habet  evidentiam  credibilitatis. 

Dicimus  ergo,  notas  Ecclesiae,  quas  adfe- 
remus,  non  lacere  evidentiam  veritatis  sim¬ 
pliciter,  quia  alioqui  nulli  invenirentur,  qui 
id  negarent,  sicut  nemo  invenitur,  qui  neget 
sententias,  quas  Mathematici  demonstrant; 
sed  tamen  efficiunt  evidentiam  credibilitatis, 
juxta  illud  Psalm.  XGI1  :  Testimonia  tua  cre¬ 
dibilia  facta  sunt  nimis  (1).  Apud  eos  autem, 
qui  admittunt  Scripturas  divinas,  et  histo¬ 
rias,  ac  Patrum  veterum  scripta,  faciunt 
etiam  evidentiam  veritatis.  Tametsi  enim 
articulorum  fidei  veritas  non  potest  nobis 
esse  evidens  absolute,  tamen  potest  esse  evi¬ 
dens  ex  hypothesi,  id  est,  supposita  veritate 
Scripturarum.  Quod  enim  a  scriptura  evi¬ 
denter  deducitur,  est  evidenter  verum,  sup¬ 
positis  Scripturis. 


i 


366 


LIBER  IV. 


Porro  hse  notae  a  variis  varie  nominantur, 
et  numerantur.  B.  Augustinus  lib.  contra 
epist.  fundamenti ,  cap.  4.  sex  notas  ponit. 
B.  Hieronymus  contra  Luciferianos  in  fi¬ 
ne,  duas.  Vincentius  in  suo  commonitorio, 
tres. 

Ex  recentioribus  Driedo  lib.  IV,  cap.  2, 
part.  2.  de  Eccles.  dogmat.  et  Petrus  a  Soto 
prima  parte  defensionis,  cap.  44.  et  sequen¬ 
tibus,  alias  tres.  Cardinalis  Hosius  in  expli¬ 
catione  symboli,  quatuor.  Nicolaus  Sanderus 
lib.  VIII  de  visibili  monarchia,  cap.  50.  alias 
sex.  Michael  Medina  lib.  II  de  recta  fide  po¬ 
nit  decem  :  et  lib.  VII,  cap.  26.  addit  unde¬ 
cimam.  Gunerus  Petri  in  libello  de  notis  Ec¬ 
clesiae  ponit  (ni  fallor)  duodecim,  nec  enim, 
cum  haec  scriberemus,  libellum  ejus  habeba¬ 
mus  in  manibus. 

Nos  quindecim  Notas  proponemus,  quae, 
si  quis  velit,  poterunt  aliquo  modo  revocari 
ad  illas  quatuor,  quae  communiter  a  recen¬ 
tioribus  assignantur  ex  Symbolo  Constanti- 
nopolitano,  Unam,  Sanctam,  Catholicam,  et 
'Apostolicam.
← Chapter 19Chapter 21 →