Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Controversiis · On Justification · Book III: On the Uncertainty, Mutability, and Inequality of Justice

Chapter 12: The error concerning the certitude of predestination is refuted

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. VI, De Justificatione, Book III. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

Hitherto we have endeavored to overthrow the first error of those four which we proposed at the beginning of this book. It follows that we discourse briefly against the second. The second error was of those who contend that certitude of faith is had not only of present grace and justice, but also of predestination and election unto glory. This error Martin Bucer taught in the Colloquy of Ratisbon. For there is extant in that Colloquy, among other titles, one on the most firm confidence and certitude of eternal salvation, and in it Bucer affirms that he is not a true Christian who does not, with the same certitude of faith by which he believes Christ to be, and God also to be, believe that he shall have eternal life. The same too he teaches in the book On Concord, in the conciliation of the article on justification. The same also Peter Martyr teaches, in the commentary on chapter 8 of the epistle to the Romans. The same error John Calvin defends tooth and nail, in book 3 of the Institutes, chapter 2, where he thus speaks, section 16: “He is not truly faithful save he who, persuaded with a solid persuasion that God is propitious to him, promises himself all things from his goodness; save he who, relying on the promises of the divine benevolence toward him, presumes an undoubted expectation of salvation.” See the same, section 40, and in the Antidote of the Council. In the same error Chemnitz is engaged, in the Examination of the Council of Trent. For he reprehends that the Council teaches, session 6, chapter 12, that no one without a peculiar revelation ought to determine for certain that he is of the number of the predestined. But Chemnitz affirms that this is a false doctrine, and proves from chapter 8 to the Romans that from the word of God all the justified can and ought to determine for certain of their own predestination. But this error conflicts with the testimonies of the divine Scripture, with the sentences of the holy Fathers, and with manifest and most open reason.

First, then, the Apostle Paul, Romans 11, disputing of predestination, refers this mystery among the deepest secrets of God, exclaiming: O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and of the knowledge of God! How incomprehensible are his judgments, and how unsearchable his ways! And who hath known the mind of the Lord? Or who hath been his counsellor? And although this depth of the secret chiefly regards the cause why God chooses one and chooses not another, yet it indicates also that it cannot be known without revelation whom God has chosen, and whom he has not chosen. For from this very thing, that we are ignorant what moves God to choose this man rather than that, and are compelled to refer the whole matter to his will, we understand that it cannot be known by any other way whom he has willed to choose, and whom not to choose, save by a special revelation, by which he himself deigns to manifest his own will to someone. Second, Scripture exhorts all the faithful to fear, when it says, Romans 11: But thou standest by faith; be not highminded, but fear, lest perhaps he also spare not thee. And 1 Corinthians 10: He that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall. And Philippians 2: With fear and trembling work out your salvation. And Apocalypse 3: Hold fast that which thou hast, that no man take thy crown. And in his second epistle the same John: Look to yourselves, that you lose not the things which you have wrought. And in Psalm 2: Serve ye the Lord with fear, and rejoice unto him with trembling. Embrace discipline, lest at any time the Lord be angry, and you perish from the just way. To these and the like Calvin and Chemnitz answer that these are said to shake off torpor and carnal security, which make men negligent in good works, not because there is in fact danger lest the true faithful fall from salvation. But it is true indeed that there is no danger lest the predestined lose eternal salvation, and that those terrors are applied by the Holy Spirit through the holy Scriptures that the elect may be excited to solicitude and diligence; but all these have place in those who are ignorant of their predestination, not in those who are most certain of it. For those who are certainly persuaded that they will altogether be saved cannot fear lest they fall from salvation; nay, they ought not to fear, if they believe this for certain with the certitude of faith, as they believe Christ to be God; for by that fear of theirs they would do injury to faith. And accordingly, if the response of the heretics were true, the Holy Spirit would exhort the elect to unbelief when he exhorts them to fear the loss of salvation. For as, if anyone admonished a believer to fear lest perhaps it be not true that Christ is God, he would without doubt seem to impel him to impiety, so plainly the Holy Spirit (which it is blasphemous to think) would provoke the elect to impiety, while he exhorts them to fear lest perhaps they be cut off, lest they perish from the just way, lest they lose their crown. Therefore we who are bidden to fear ought not, nor can, believe for certain with the certitude of faith that we are of the number of those to be saved.

Third, Scripture in express words teaches that salvation depends on the condition of works. Matthew 5: Unless your justice abound more than that of the Scribes and Pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 19: If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. Romans 8: And if sons, heirs also; yet so, if we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified with him. 2 Timothy 2: If we be dead with him, we shall live also with him. And in the same place: He is not crowned, except he strive lawfully. But the adversaries grant that there can be no certitude of salvation, if it depend on the condition of works; whence, then, do they so confidently affirm that they are most certain of salvation and eternal life? They will answer, perhaps, that they have all these things not in themselves, but in Christ, of whom they are made members through faith. For so Calvin bids the believer regard not himself and his works, but regard Christ, not as placed outside him, but as remaining in him, and communicating all his goods. But this response is not solid. For Christ himself requires of his members that they too work well, and, as a vine, requires that the branches bear fruit; otherwise he threatens excision: I am the true vine (says John 15), and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit, he will take it away. And below: If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into the fire, and he burneth. It does not, then, suffice unto salvation to be ingrafted into the vine Christ, unless one, as a branch, bring forth the fruit of good works. Then, when the Lord says, Unless your justice abound, etc., and, If thou wilt enter into life, etc., he signifies not that the members arrogate to themselves the justice of the head, but that they too work, and do justice — as is clear from what follows, where he says, Matthew 5, But I say to you, Love your enemies, etc.; and Matthew 19, If thou wilt be perfect, sell all that thou hast, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven. They are wont to answer that works are indeed required, but not as a condition on which the promise of eternal life depends, but because true faith is not unless it be living, and fructify good works; for sins — that is, the works of the flesh — shake off faith, and pour out the Holy Spirit. But we labor not in this place why works be necessary, but are content if it be granted us that they are necessarily exacted, and that without them eternal life is not obtained. For hence we evidently conclude that without divine revelation no one can determine for certain that he is of the number of the elect, since no one, even by the adversaries’ own witness, can determine for certain that he will do all those good works which Christ commands to be done.

Fourth, Scripture testifies that many believe for a time, and afterward make shipwreck concerning faith and perish — as is clear, Luke 8, of the seed which fell upon the rock, which the Lord expounds of those who believe for a time, and in the time of temptation fall away. And 1 Timothy 4: The Spirit manifestly saith that in the last times some shall depart from the faith. And chapter 6: Which some coveting have erred from the faith. But those who have fallen from grace and faith have no certitude of their restoration into grace; nay, Scripture says that this is plainly uncertain, when it says, 2 Timothy 2, Lest perhaps God give them repentance, and they recover themselves. And Joel 2: Who knoweth but he will return, and forgive? But if many believers afterward stray from the truth, and become reprobates, then those were not certain from faith that they would persevere; otherwise their faith would have been false. But certitude of predestination cannot be had without certitude of perseverance, since perseverance is the effect most proper to predestination, and without perseverance predestination cannot be fulfilled; therefore neither were those men certain of predestination from faith. And thereby it is false that all the faithful are certain, with the certitude of faith, of their own predestination. To this argument Calvin can somehow answer, seeing he denies that those had true faith who do not persevere — which error we shall refute a little after. But Chemnitz can answer nothing at all. For he openly confesses that the faithful can fall from grace, and not persevere, and yet boldly affirms that those who have faith ought to determine for certain that they are predestined. Which how ill they cohere among themselves, everyone sees. For if all ought from faith to determine for certain that they are predestined, and yet can not persevere, and thereby not be saved, then either the predestination of God can be deceived, or a man can from faith believe for certain that which is uncertain, and which it can be that it be false. Chemnitz answers that faith is always true, because that some persevere not comes not from this, that God will not preserve them unto the end, but because they by the works of the flesh shake off faith. But it is an inept solution. For this is what we press: that no one can be certain from faith that he pertains to the number of the elect, since it can be that he shake off faith, and at last be reprobate. For since true faith can be in one who in fact is reprobate before God, since he is foreknown as one who will not persevere, it evidently follows that either faith does not teach him to be of the number of the elect, or faith is false; for how can a reprobate believe from true faith that he is not reprobate, but elect?

To these testimonies of Scripture can be added also the testimonies of the Fathers. St. John Chrysostom, homily 11 on the epistle to the Philippians: “If Paul, who suffered so many things, was not yet secure about that resurrection, what shall we say?” St. Jerome, book 2 against the Pelagians: “Call no one blessed before death; for as long as we live, we are in the struggle; as long as in the struggle, there is no certain victory.” St. Augustine, book 11 On the City of God, chapter 12: “Although the saints be certain of the reward of their perseverance, yet of their perseverance itself they are found uncertain. For what man knows that he will persevere in the action and progress of justice unto the end, unless he be made certain by some revelation from him who, by a just and hidden judgment, instructs not all of this matter, but deceives no one?” Martin Bucer, in the book On Concord, near the end of the conciliation of the article on justification, objected this one place to himself, and applied two responses, or, if you prefer, tergiversations. First he says that the saints of themselves cannot determine for certain whether they will persevere; yet because they are called to the everlasting fellowship of Christ, they ought from faith to be altogether certain that they will persevere unto the end. Second he says that Augustine speaks of the certitude of science, not of the certitude of faith. But if the saints of themselves ought to determine — that is, from the powers of their own nature — they ought to determine for certain that they will not persevere. For how without the grace of God would they persevere? And so, if they ought to determine of themselves, they are not uncertain, as Augustine says, but plainly certain. Bucer will say, perhaps, that that “of themselves” ought not to be referred to the powers of persevering, but to knowledge, so that the sense is that the saints cannot determine for certain that they will persevere from the light of reason alone, but from the light of faith can altogether. But on the contrary; for of the reward of perseverance they are not certain of themselves — that is, from the light of reason alone — but from the light of faith; and yet Augustine writes that of the reward of perseverance the saints are certain, of perseverance itself uncertain. Moreover, if the saints were certain from the light of faith of their perseverance, all who are endowed with faith would have this certitude; but Augustine says that not all the saints — that is, not all who have faith — are certain of this matter, but only those to whom God deigns to manifest it by a special revelation. Augustine wills, then, that not only of themselves, but also from faith, and not only with the certitude of science, but also with the certitude of faith, the saints are uncertain of their perseverance. But that we may take from Bucer all occasion of tergiversating, let us add two other places, in the book On Rebuke and Grace, chapter 13: “Who, of the multitude of the faithful, as long as he lives in this mortality, presumes that he is in the number of the predestined?” Likewise in the book On the Good of Perseverance, chapter 13: “To which calling” (according to purpose, which is proper to the elect) “no man is to be said by men, with certain asseveration, to pertain, save when he has departed from this world. But in this human life, which is a temptation upon earth, he that seemeth to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.” St. Gregory, book 6 on 1 Kings: “Since the judgment of the omnipotent God is unsearchable, whence a man comes and whither he goes he knows not, since it cannot be known whether one ought to persevere unto the end in the grace which he receives.” St. Prosper, in book 2 On the Vocation of the Gentiles, last chapter: “In a secret most remote from human knowledge is hidden the predefinition of this election. And of no one, before his own end, can it be foretold that he will be in the glory of the elect, that a useful fear may keep a persevering humility, and he that stands may take heed lest he fall.” St. Bernard, whom in the place noted Bucer calls a man of God, and all the Lutherans in the question of justification are wont to make much of, thus speaks in sermon 1 on Septuagesima: “Who can say, I am of the elect? I am of the predestined to life? I am of the number of the elect? Certitude indeed we have not, but the confidence of hope consoles us.” The same, in epistle 107: “It is granted to have some presentiment of one’s own future beatitude, in the manner in which from eternity it lay hidden in the one justifying, to appear more fully in the one beatifying. Yet of this, the knowledge of himself in part being received, let one meanwhile glory in hope, not yet in security.”

Let us add, lastly, reasons. The first reason: nothing ought to be affirmed of those things which depend on the sole will of God, save from a manifest revelation of him. For if no one can certainly know what is in a man, save his spirit, how much more will no one be able to know what is in God, save the Spirit of God? But that predestination depends on the will of God is clear, since he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will he hardeneth, Romans 9. And whom he chooses, he chooses not from works, but from mercy. They will say: God revealed by his Spirit in the Scriptures that all who believe shall have eternal life. But nowhere did he reveal that all who say they believe, believe as they ought. For if it were enough to say, “I believe,” or even, “I believe rightly, and as I ought,” all heretics would be saved. The second reason: a man cannot be certain from faith whether he be worthy of hatred or love according to the present justice which he has in himself, as we showed in the preceding disputation; therefore much less can he be certain from faith whether he be worthy of hatred or love according to the eternal decree which lies hidden in God himself. For it cannot be doubted that the knowledge of present justice is easier than of eternal predestination. The third reason is taken from the utility of this secret. For, as St. Augustine writes, in the book On Rebuke and Grace, chapter 13, it is most useful for preserving humility that it be not known in this life who certainly pertains to the number of the elect. And although God could by another way too make medicine for this disease of elation, yet so it pleased that great physician, who takes not the order of healing from the sick man. The fourth reason is St. Prosper’s, in the place noted, since this was most useful also on account of the reprobate. For if it were known who are the predestined, all the rest, despairing of salvation, would care to do nothing of good at all. And so, that he that stands may take heed lest he fall, and he that, overcome by temptation, has fallen may strive to rise again, and no one distrust of the mercy of God, no one despair, it was most useful that election should be most secret.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
CAPUT  XII. 

Ee fellitur  error  de  certitudine  Praedestinationis. 

Hactenus  primum  errorem  ex  illis  qua- 


tuor,  quos  initio  hujus  libri  proposuimus, 
expugnare  conati  sumus.  Sequitur  ut  adver¬ 
sus  secundum  breviter  disseramus. 

Secundus  error  eorum  erat,  qui  non  so¬ 
lum  de  praesenti  gratia,  atque  justitia,  sed 
etiam  de  praedestinatione,  atque  electione 
ad  gloriam  certitudinem  fidei  haberi  conten¬ 
dunt.  Docuit  hunc  errorem  Martinus  Buce¬ 
rus,  in  Colloquio  Ralisbonensi.  Nam  exstat 
in  eo  Colloquio  inter  alios  titulos,  unus  de 
firmissima  aeternae  salutis  fiducia,  et  certitu¬ 
dine,  et  in  eo  affirmat  Bucerus,  non  esse  ve¬ 
rum  christianum,  qui  non  eadem  fidei  cer- 
titudiuc,  credit  se  habiturum  esse  vitam 
aeternam,  qua  credit,  Christum  esse,  ctDeum 
etiam  esse.  Idem  etiam  docet  in  lib.  de  Con¬ 
cordia,  in  conciliatione  articuli  de  justifica¬ 
tione  :  Idem  quoque  docet  Petrus  Martyr,  in 
commentar,  ad  cap.  vm.  epist.  ad  Roman. 
Eumdem  errorem  mordicus  defendit  Joannes 
Calvinus,  in  lib.  m.  Institution.  cap.  2.  ubi 
sicloquiturg.  16  :  «Vere  fidelis  non  est, nisi  qui 
solida  persuasione  Deum  sibi  propitium  per¬ 
suasus,  de  ejus  benignitate  omnia  sibi  polli¬ 
cetur,  nisi  qui  divinae  erga  se  benevolentiie 
promissionibus  fretus,  indubitatam  salutis 
expectationem  praesumit».  Vide  eumdem §. 
40.  et  in  antidoto  Concilii.  In  eodem  errore 
versatur  Kemnitius,  in  Examine  Concilii  Tri- 
dentini.  Reprehendit  enim  quod  Concilium 
docet,  sess.  6.  cap.  12.  neminem  sine  pecu¬ 
liari  revelatione,  certo  statuere  debere  se 
esse  ex  numero  praedestinatorum.  Affirmat 
vero  Kemnitius,  hanc  falsam  esse  doctrinam, 
et  probat  ex  cap.  vm.  ad  Roman.  Ex  verbo 
Dei  posse  ac  debere  omnes  justificatos  certo 
statuere  de  sua  praedestinatione. 

Ceeterum  hic  error  pugnat  cum  Scripturae 
divinae  testimoniis,  cum  sententiis  sancto¬ 
rum  Patrum,  et  cum  manifesta,  atque  aper¬ 
tissima  ratione. 

Primum  igitur,  Apostolus  Paulus  ad  Ro¬ 
man.  xi.  de  Praedestinatione  disputans,  re¬ 
fert  hoc  mysterium  inter  altissima  Dei  se¬ 
creta,  exclamans  :  0  altitudo  divitiarum  sa¬ 
pientiae  et  scientiae  Dei,  quam  inscrutabilia 
sunt  judicia  ejus,  et  investigabiles  vix  ejus  i 
Et,  quis  novit  sensum  Domini,  aut  quis  consi¬ 
liarius  ejus  fuit  (2)?  Et  quamvis  haec  altitudo 
secreti  praecipue  respiciat  causam,  cur  Deus 
unum  eligat,  alterum  non  eligat,  tamen  in¬ 
dicat  etiam  non  posse  sciri  sine  revelatione, 
quem  Deus  elegerit,  et  quem  non  elegerit. 


(1)  Rom.  V,  3;  II  Cor.  VII,  4;  ibid.  VIII,  2;  Jacob,  I,  2;Psal.  IV,2;ib.  XCill,  <9. -.(->)  Rom.  X!,  33 


CAPUT  XII. 


281 


Nam  ex  hoc  ipso,  quod  ignoramus,  quid  mo¬ 
veat  Deum,  ut  hunc  potius  quam  illum  eli¬ 
gat,  et  in  ejus  voluntatem  rem  totam  referre 
cogimur,  intelligimus  non  posse  alia  via  co¬ 
gnosci,  quem  eligere,  et  quem  non  eligere 
voluerit,  nisi  per  revelationem  specialem, 
qua  suam  ipse  voluntatem  alicui  manifestare 
dignetur. 

Secundo,  Scriptura  hortatur  omnes  fideles 
ad  timorem,  cum  ait  Roman.  xi.  Tu  autem 
fide  stas ,  noli  altum  sapere,  sed  time ,  ne  forte 
et  tibi  non  parcat.  Et  I  Gorinth.  x.  Qui  stat 
videat  ne  cadat.  Et  Philip,  n.  Cum  timore,  et 
tremore  salutem  vestram  operamini.  Et  Ap.o- 
cal.  iii.  Tene,  quod  habes,  ne  forte  alius  acci¬ 
piat  coronam  tuam.  Et  in  epist.  n.-idem 
Joannes  :  Videte ,  inquit,  ne  perdatis ,  qux 
operati  estis.  Et  in  Psal.  ii  :  Servite  Domino  in 
timore  et  exaltate  ei  cum  tremore.  Apprehen¬ 
dite  disciplinam ,  n:  quando  irascatur  Domi¬ 
nus,  et  pereatis  de  via  justa  (1). 

Ad  haec  et  similia  respondent  Calvinus  et 
Kemnitius,  ha;c  dici  ad  excutiendum  torpo¬ 
rem  et  carnalem  securitatem,  quai  homines 
in  operibus  bonis  negligentes  faciunt,  non 
quod  revera  periculum  sit,  ne  veri  fideles 
excidant  a  salute.  At  verum  quidem  est, 
nullum  osse  periculum,  ne  praedestinati  sa¬ 
lutem  aeternam  perdant,  et  terrores  illos  a 
Spiritu-Sancto,  per  Scripturas  sanctas  adhi¬ 
beri,  ut  electi  ad  sollicitudinem  et  diligen¬ 
tiam  excitentur,  sed  haec  omnia  locum  ha¬ 
bent  in  iis,  qui  praedestinationem  suam  igno¬ 
rant,  non  in  iis,  qui  de  illa  certissimi  sunt. 
Nam  qui  certo  persuasi  sunt,  se  omnino  sal¬ 
vandos,  non  possunt  timere,  ne  excidant  a 
salute,  immo  nec  debent  timere,  si- id  certo 
credunt  certitudine  fidei,  quomodo  credunt 
Christum  esse  Deum,  nam  isto  suo  timore 
injuriam  fidei  facerent. 

Proinde  si  vera  esset  responsio  haeretico- 
rum,  Spiritus-Sanctus  hortaretur  electos  ad 
infidelitatem  cum  hortatur  ad  timorem  amit¬ 
tendae  salutis  :  Quemadmodum  enim  si  quis 
admoneret  fidelem  ut  timeret,  ne  forte  non 
sit  verum,  Christum  esse  Deum,  ad  impieta¬ 
tem  sine  dubio  eum  impellere  videretur.  Ita 
prorsus  Spiritus-Sanctus  (quod  blasphemum 
est  cogitare)  ad  impietatem  provocaret  ele¬ 
ctos,  dum  hortatur  ut  timeant,  ne  forte  cx- 
cindantur,  ne  pereant  de  via  justa,  ne  amit¬ 
tant  coronam  suam.  Igitur  qui  timere  jube¬ 


mur,  non  debemus,  nec  possumus  certo 
credere  certitudine  fidei,  nos  esse  de  numero 
salvandorum. 

Tertio,  Scriptura  disertis  verbis  docet,  sa¬ 
lutem  pendere  aconditione  operum,  Matth.v. 
Nisi  abundaverit,  justitia  vestra  plus  quam 
Scribarum  et  Pharisxorum ,  non  intrabitis  in 
regnum  coelorum.  Matth.  xix.  Si  vis  ad  vitam 
ingredi ,  serva  mandata  Rom.  vm.  Quod  si 
filii  et  haeredes ,  si  tamen  compatimur ,  ut  et 
conglorificemur.  II.  Timot.  n.  Si  commortui 
sumus,  et  convivemus.  Et  ibidem  :  Non  coro¬ 
nabitur,  nisi  qui  legitime  certaverit  (2).  At 
concedunt  adversarii  nullam  esse  posse  cer¬ 
titudinem  salutis,  si  ea  pendeat  a  conditione 
operum, unde  igitur  tam  confidenter  affirmant 
se  de  salute  et  vita  aeterna  esse  certissimos  ? 

Respondebunt  fortasse,  haec  omnia  se  ha¬ 
bere  non  in  se,  sed  in  Christo,  cujus  facti 
sunt  membra  per  fidem.  Sic  enim  jubet  Cal¬ 
vinus,  ut  fidelis  non  respiciat  se  et  opera  sua, 
sed  respiciat  Christum,  non  ut  extra  se  posi¬ 
tum,  sed  ut  in  se  manentem,  et  omnia  bona 
sua  communicantem.  Sed  haec  responsio  non 
est  solida.  Nam  Christus  ipse  requirit  a  mem¬ 
bris  suis,  ut  ipsa  etiam  bene  operentur,  et 
tamquam  vitis  requirit,  ut  palmites  fructum 
ferant.  Alioqui  excisionem  minatur  :  Ego 
sum  vitis  vera  (inquit  Joan.  xv.)  et  Pater 
meus  agricola  est.  Omnem  palmitem  in  me  non 
ferentem  fructum,  tollet  eum.  Et  infra  :  Si 
quis  in  me  non  manserit,  mittetur  foras  sicut 
palmes,  et  arescet,  et  colligent  eum,  et  in 
ignem  mittent,  et  ardet  (3).  Non  igitur  sufficit 
ad  salutem  insertum  esse  in  vitem  Christum, 
nisi  quis  ut  palmes  fructum  bonorum  operum 
pariat.  Deinde,  cum  Dominus  ait :  Nisi  abun¬ 
daverit  justitia  vestra  etc.  Et :  Si  vis  ad  vitam 
ingredi  etc.  Non  significat  ut  membra  justi¬ 
tiam  capitis  sibi  arrogent,  sed  ut  ipsa  quoque 
operentur,  et  justitiam  faciant,  ut  perspi¬ 
cuum  est  ex  sequentibus,  ubi  ait  Matth.  v. 
Ego  autem  dico  vobis,  diligite  inimicos  ve¬ 
stros  etc.  Et  Matth.  xix.  Si  vis  perfectus  esse, 
vende  omnia  quee  habes,  et  habebis  thesaurum 
in  coelo  (4). 

Respondere  solent,  opera  quidem  requiri, 
sed  non  ut  conditionem,  a  qua  pendeat  pro¬ 
missio  vitae  aeternae,  sed  quia  fides  vera  non 
est  nisi  sit  viva,  et  fructificet  opera  bona, 
nam  peccata,  id  est,  opera  carnis  excutiunt 
fidem,  et  effundunt  Spiritum-Sanctum.  At 


(1)  Rom.  X!,  20;I  Cor.  X,  12;  Phil.  11,12;  Ap.  III,  11;  II  Joan.  8;  Psal.  11,11 .— (2j  Mat.V,  20;ib.XIX, 
17:  Rom.  VIII,  17;  II  Tim.  II,  1 1 ;  ibid.  5.  -  (3)  Joan.  XV,  I,  6.  —  (4;  Matth  V,  14;  ibid.  XIX,  21. 

Tom.  YI.  i0 


i 


282 


LIBER  III. 


non  laboramus  hoc  loco  cur  sini  opera  ne¬ 
cessaria,  sed  contenti  sumus,  si  detur  nobis, 
ea  necessario  exigi,  et  sine  illis  non  obtineri 
vitam  seternam.  Hinc  enim  evidenter  con¬ 
cludimus,  sine  divina  revelatione  neminem 
certo  statuere  posse,  se  esse  de  numero  ele¬ 
ctorum,  cum  nemo,  ipsis  etiam  adversariis  tes¬ 
tibus,  certo  statuere  possit,  se  facturum  om¬ 
nia  illa  bona  opera,  quse  Christus  fieri  jubet. 

Quarto,  Scriptura  testatur,  multos  ad  tem¬ 
pus  credere,  et  postea  circa  fidem  naufragare 
et  perire,  ut  patet  Luc.  8.  de  semine  quod 
cecidit  super  petram,  quod  exponit  Dominus 
de  iis,  qui  ad  tempus  credunt,  et  in  tempore 
tentationis  recedunt.  Et  I  Timoth.  iv.  Spi¬ 
ritus  manifeste  dicit ,  quia  in  novissimis  diebus 
discedent  quidam  a  fide.  Et  cap.  6.  Quam  qui¬ 
dam  appetentes  erraverunt  a  fde  (i).  Qui  au¬ 
tem  a  gratia  et  fide  exciderunt,  nullam  cer¬ 
titudinem  habent  sua3  restitutionis  in  gra¬ 
tiam,  immo  Scriptura  dicit,  hoc  plane  esse 
incertum,  cum  ait  II  ad  Tim.  ii.  Ne  forte  det 
illis  Deus  poenitentiam  et  resipiscant.  Et  Joelis 
ii.  Quis  scit  si  convertatur  et  ignoscat  Deus  (2)  ? 
At  si  multi  credentes  a  veritate  postea  aber¬ 
rant,  et  reprobi  fiunt,  igitur  non  erant  illi 
certi  ex  fide  se  perseveraturos,  alioqui  falsa 
fuisset  eorum  fides.  Non  potest  autem  certi¬ 
tudo  praedestinationis  haberi  sine  certitu¬ 
dine  perse verantise,  cum  perseverantia  sit 
effectus  maxime  proprius  praedestinationis, 
et  sine  perseverantia  non  possit  impleri  prae¬ 
destinatio,  igitur  neque  de  praedestinatione 
homines  illi  certi  fuerunt  ex  fide.  Ac  per  hoc 
falsum  est,  omnes  fideles  certos  esse  certitu. 
dine  fidei  de  sua  praedestinatione. 

Ad  hoc  argumentum  utcumque  respon¬ 
dere  potest  Calvinus,  quippe  qui  negat  ha¬ 
buisse  veram  fidem  illos  qui  non  perseve¬ 
rant.  Quem  errorem  paulo  post  refellemus. 
Kemnitius  vero  nihil  omnino  respondere 
potest.  Ipse  enim  aperte  fatetur,  posse  fide¬ 
les  excidere  a  gratia,  et  non  perseverare,  et 
tamen  audacter  affirmat  debere  eos,  qui  fi¬ 
dem  habent  certo  statuere  se  esse  praidesti- 
natos.  Quae  quam  male  inter  se  cohaereant, 
nemo  non  videt.  Nam  si  omnes  debent  ex 
fide  certo  statuere  se  esse  praedestinatos,  et 
tamen  possunt  non  perseverare,  et  per  hoc 
non  salvari,  igitur  vel  potest  falli  praedesti¬ 
natio  Dei,  vel  potest  homo  ex  fide  certo  cre¬ 
dere  id,  quod  est  incertum,  et  quod  fieri 
potest  ut  sit  falsum. 


Respondet  Kemnitius,  fidem  semper  esse 
veram ;  quia  quod  aliqui  non  perseverent, 
non  fit  ex  eo  quod  Deus  nolit  conservare  eos 
usque  in  finem,  sed  quia  ipsi  per  opera  car¬ 
nis  fidem  excutiunt.  At  inepta  solutio  est. 
Hoc  ciiim  est  quod  nos  urgemus,  non  pogse 
ullum  ex  fide  certum  esse,  se  ad  numerum 
electorum  pertinere,  quia  potest  fieri,  ut  ex¬ 
cutiat  fidem,  et  tandem  sit  reprobus.  Nam 
cum  vera  fides  possit  esse  in  eo,  qui  re  vera 
coram  Deo  reprobus  est,  cum  praesciatur  non 
perseveraturus,  evidenter  sequitur,  ut  vel 
fides  non  doceat  eum  esse  de  numero  electo¬ 
rum,  vel  fi-des  sit  falsa;  quomodo  enim  re¬ 
probus  credere  potest  ex  fide  vera  se  non 
esse  reprobum,  sed  electum? 

Ad  haec  testimonia  Scripturae  addi  possunt 
etiam  testimonia  Patrum.  S.  Joannes  Chry- 
sostomus  hum.  11.  in  epist.  ad  Philip.  «  Si 
Paulus,  inquit,  qui  tanta  passus  est,  nondum 
de  resurrectione  illa  securus  fuit,  quid  sane 
nos  dicemus  ? 

S.  Hieronymus  lib.  ii.  adversus  Pelagia- 
nos  :«  Ne  beatum,  inquit,  dixeris  quempiam 
ante  mortem,  quamdiu  enim  vivimus,  in 
certamine  sumus ;  quamdiu  in  certamine, 
nulla  est  certa  victoria. 

S.  Augustinus  lib.  xi.  de  Civ.  Dei  cap.  12. 
r  Licet,  inquit,  sancti  de  suae  perseverantiae 
praemio  certi  sint,  de  ipsa  tamen  perseve¬ 
rantia  sua  reperiuntur  incerti.  Quis  enim  ho¬ 
minum  se  in  actione,  profectuque  justitiae 
perseveraturum  usque  in  finem  sciat,  nisi 
aliqua  revelatione  ab  illo  fiat  certus,  qui  de 
hac  re  justo,  latentique  judicio  non  omnes 
instruit,  sed  neminem  fallit?  » 

Martinus  Bucerus  in  lib.  de  concordia,  sub 
finem  conciliationis  articuli  de  justificatione, 
hunc  unum  locum  sibi  ipsi  objecit,  et  duas 
adhibuit  responsiones,  sive  malis  dicere  ter¬ 
giversationes.  Primo  dicit,  Sanctos  ex  se 
non  posse  certo  statuere,  an  sint  persevera¬ 
turi  ;  tamen  quia  vocati  sunt  ad  sempiter¬ 
num  Christi  consortium,  ex  fide  debere  om¬ 
nino  certos  esse,  se  usque  in  finem  perseve¬ 
raturos.  Secundo  dicit,  Augustinum  loqui  de 
certitudine  scientia),  non  de  certitudine  fi¬ 
dei.  At  si  Sancti  ex  se  statuere  debeant,  id 
est,  ex  viribus  natura;  sua;,  certo  statuere 
debent,  se  non  perseveraturos.  Quo  modo 
enim  sine  Dei  gratia  perseverarent?  Itaque 
si  ex  se  statuere  debent,  non  sunt  incerti,  ut 
Augustinus  dicit,  sed  plane  certi. 


(1)  1  Tim.  IV,  I  ;  ibid.  VI,  10.  -  (2)  II  Tim.  11,20;  Joel.  II,  14. 


CAPUT  XII. 


283 


Dicet  ibrtasse  Bucerus,  illud  «  (ex  se)  » 
non  debere  ad  vires  perseverandi  referri, 
sed  ad  cognitionem,  ut  sensus  sit,  Sanctos 
non  posse  statuere  certo  se  perseveraturos 
ex  lumine  solius  rationis,  sed  ex  lumine  fidei 
omnino  posse.  At  contra,  nam  de  praemio 
perseverantiae  non  sunt  certi  ex  se,  id  est,  ex 
lumine  solius  rationis,  sed  ex  lumine  fidei : 
et  tamen  Augustinus  scribit,  de  praemio  per¬ 
severantiae  Sanctos  esse  certos,  de  ipsa  per¬ 
severantia  incertos.  Praeterea  si  certi  essent 
Sancti  ex  lumine  fidei  de  sua  perseverantia, 
omnes,  qui  fide  praediti  sunt,  hanc  certitudi¬ 
nem  haberent ;  At  Augustinus  dicit,  non  om¬ 
nes  Sanctos,  id  est,  non  omnes  qui  fidem 
habent,  esse  de  hac  re  certos,  sed  illos  tan¬ 
tum,  quibus  Deus  per  specialem  revelatio¬ 
nem  id  manifestare  dignatur.  Yult  igitur  Au¬ 
gustinus  non  solum  ex  se,  sed  etiam  ex  fide, 
et  non  solum  certitudine  scientiae,  sed  etiam 
certitudine  fidei  Sanctos  de  sua  perseveran¬ 
tia  esse  incertos. 

Sed  ut  omnem  tergiversandi  occasionem 
Bucero  auferamus,  addamus  alia  duo  loca 
in  lib.  de  correptione  et  gratia  cap.  13. 
«  Quis,  inquit,  ex  multitudine  fidelium, 
quamdiu  in  hac  mortalitate  vivitur,  in  nu¬ 
mero  praedestinatorum  se  esse  praesumnt  »  ? 
Item  in  lib.  de  bono  perseverantiae  cap.  xm. 
«  Ad  quam  vocationem  »  (secundum  propo¬ 
situm,  quae  propria  est  electorum) '«  pertinere 
nullus  est  homo  ab  hominibus  certa  asseve¬ 
ratione  dicendus,  nisi  cum  de  hoc  saeculo 
exierit.  In  hac  autem  vita  humana,  quae  ten- 
tatio  est  super  terram,  qui  videtur  stare,  vi¬ 
deat  ne  cadat » . 

S.  Gregorius  lib.  vi.  in  1.  Iteg.  «  Quia  ju¬ 
dicium,  inquit,  omnipotentis  Dei  imperscru- 
tabile  est,  unde  veniat,  et  quo  vadat  homo 
nescit,  quia  sciri  non  potest,  an  quis  in  gra¬ 
tia,  quam  recipit,  perseverare  in  perpetuum 
debeat » . 

S.  Prosper,  in  lib.  ii.  de  vocatione  gen¬ 
tium  cap.  ult.  (i  In  remotissimo,  inquit,  ab 
humana  cognitione  secreto  praefinitio  hujus 
electionis  abscondita  est.  Et  de  nullo  ante 
ipsius  finem  praenunciari  potest,  quod  in  ele¬ 
ctorum  gloria  sit  futurus,  ut  perseverantem 
humilitatem  utilis  metus  servet,  et  qui  stat 
videat  ne  cadat  » . 

S.  Bernardus,  quem  virum  Dei  loco  citato 
Bueerus  appellat,  et  Lutherani  omnes  in 
quaestione  de  Justificatione  magnifacere  so¬ 


lent,  sic  loquitur  in  sermon.  1.  de  Septuage¬ 
sima  :  «  Quis  potest  dicere,  ego  de  electis 
sum?  ego  de  praedestinatis  ad  vitam?  ego  de 
numero  electorum  ?  certitudinem  utique  non 
habemus,  sed  spei  fiducia  consolatur  nos  ». 
Idem  in  epist.  107.  «  Datur,  inquit,  aliquid 
praesentire  de  sua  ipsius  futura  beatitudinc, 
quemadmodum  ab  aeterno  latuit  in  justifi¬ 
cante  plenius  appariturum  in  beatificante. 
De  qua  tamen  jam  percepta  suimet  ex  parte 
notitia,  interim  quidem  glorietur  in  spe,  non¬ 
dum  tamen  in  securitate  » . 

Addamus  ultimo  rationes.  Prima  ratio  : 
nihil  affirmari  debet  de  his,  quee  pendent  ex 
sola  Dei  voluntate,  nisi  ex  manifesta  revela¬ 
tione  ipsius  :  si  enim  nemo  certo  scire  po¬ 
test,  quid  sit  in  homine,  nisi  spiritus  ejus, 
quanto  magis  nemo  scire  poterit  quid  sit  in 
Deo,  nisi  Spiritus  Dei?  Pendere  autem  prae¬ 
destinationem  ex  Dei  voluntate,  perspicuum 
est,  quia  cujus  vult  miseretur ,  et  quem  vult 
indurat.  Ilorn.  ix.  (1).  Et  quos  eligit  non  ex 
operibus,  sed  ex  misericordia  eligit.  Dicent, 
revelavit  Deus  per  Spiritum  suum  in  Scri¬ 
pturis,  omnes  qui  credunt,  habituros  esse 
vitam  aeternam.  At  nusquam  revelavit  om¬ 
nes  qui  dicunt  se  credere,  eos  credere  sicut 
oportet.  Nam  si  satis  esset  dicere,  ego  credo, 
vel  etiam,  ego  recte  credo,  et  sicut  oportet, 
credo,  omnes  haeretici  salvarentur. 

Secunda  ratio.  Non  potest  homo  certus 
esse  ex  fide,  an  sit  dignus  odio  vel  amore  se¬ 
cundum  praesentem  justitiam,  quam  in  se 
habet,  ut  ostendimus  in  disputatione  praece¬ 
denti,  igitur  multo  minus  ex  fide  certus  esse 
potest,  an  sit  dignus  odio  vel  amore  secun¬ 
dum  aeternum  decretum,  quod  in  ipso  Deo 
latet.  Neque  enim  dubitari  potest,  quin  faci¬ 
lior  sit  notitia  praesentis  justitiae,  quam  aeter¬ 
nae  praedestinationis. 

Tertia  ratio  sumitur  ab  utilitate  hujus  se¬ 
creti.  Nam  ut  scribit  S.  Augustinus,  in  lib. 
de  corrept.  et  gratia  cap.  13.  utilissimum  est 
ad  humilitatem  conservandam,  ut  non  scia¬ 
tur  in  hac  vita,  quis  ad  numerum  electorum 
certo  pertineat.  Et  quamvis  posset  Deus  alia 
etiam  ratione  huic  elationis  morbo  medici¬ 
nam  facere  :  tamen  sic  placuit  magno  illi 
medico,  qui  ordinem  sanandi  non  accipit  ab 
£egi'oto. 

Quarta  ratio  est  S.  Prosperi  loco  notato, 
quoniam  id  etiam  utilissimum  fuit  propter 
reprobos.  Nam  si  scirentur  qui  sint  prtede- 


(1)  Rom.  IX,  18. 


284 


LIBER  III. 


i 


stinati,  reliqui  omnes  desperantes  da  salute 
nihil  omnino  boni  peragere  curarent.  Itaque 
ut  qui  stat,  videat  ne  cadat,  et  qui  victus 
tentatione  cecidit,  resurgere  conetur,  et  ne¬ 
mo  de  Dei  miseratione  diffidat,  nemo  despe¬ 
ret,  utilissimum  fuit,  ut  secretissima  esset 
eleetio.
← Chapter 11Chapter 13 →