Faith & the Word

Bellarmine · De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis · On the Ecclesiastical Writers

Chapter 26: The Eleventh Century: Anselm of Canterbury, Anselm of Laon, the Micrologus, Oecumenius, Bruno, Ivo of Chartres

Our translation, from the Latin of the Opera Omnia (Paris: Vivès, 1870–74), vol. XII, De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis, of the New Testament, eleventh century. The Latin source text is public domain; this English rendering is released with the site. Scripture quotations follow Bellarmine's Vulgate citations, rendered in Douay-Rheims wording where he quotes exactly. Click “Show the Latin” for the original (raw OCR of the scan; scanning errors remain — the scan itself is the authority).

St. Anselm of Canterbury. 1081

St. Anselm was made Archbishop of Canterbury in the year of the Lord 1093, in the time of Pope Urban the second and of the emperor Henry the third, otherwise the fourth. He was a man Italian by nation, a Monk by profession, of most keen mind, and of wonderful holiness joined with the greatest prudence and humility; the disciple and successor of Lanfranc, of whom we spoke a little before. His life, faithfully written by Eadmer, is extant in Surius on the 21st of April. He died happily in the 76th year of his age, of salvation 1109; unless there is an error in the figures and it should be written 1106 [as printed]; for he lived thirteen years in the episcopate, and had been created Bishop in the year of the Lord 1093; all of which is clear from Eadmer himself. He wrote many works, but many more are falsely attributed to him. I shall write here first those which Eadmer his friend noted, and in the very order in which Eadmer relates they were written by Anselm.

First, then, he wrote three books: On truth, 1; On free will, 1; On the fall of the Devil, 1. Then he wrote three others: the Monologion, 1 book; On the grammarian, 1; the Proslogion, 1. A little after he wrote an answer to a certain critic of his, with the criticism itself set first; these books are entitled “For the fool, and against the fool”. And these works he composed before he became Archbishop. Then, made Archbishop, he wrote one book On the incarnation of the Word, which he offered to Pope Urban, and which was most pleasing to him. He wrote then near Capua in Italy the book he had begun in England, which is entitled “Why God became man”. Afterwards at Lyons in Gaul he wrote two books: On the virginal conception and original sin, 1 book; On the meditation of human redemption, 1. Not far from the end of his life he wrote in England On the harmony of foreknowledge, predestination and the grace of God with free will. And when he was dying he said he wished for a little more time, that he might finish the most obscure question of the origin of the soul which he had begun; but this time was not given him, that a greater good might be given him in eternity. He wrote lastly many letters, both before the archbishopric and after, of which [three books] are extant [“duodecim” printed]. All these works are extant, often printed, except the last; and of these no question should be made.

Now I shall add the works carried under the name of St. Anselm, divided into three volumes. In the first volume: Commentaries on Matthew, and lessons or explanations on various places of the Gospels. In the second volume: Commentaries on the letters of St. Paul; Commentaries on the Canticles and on the Apocalypse. In the third volume: little works and letters; and the little works, besides those we have given from Eadmer, are these: On the procession of the Holy Spirit, 1 book; On leavened and unleavened bread, 1; On the difference of the Sacraments, 1; On likenesses, 1; On the will of God, 1; On the misery of man, 1; On the measurement of the Cross, 1; a little book of Meditations, 1; On the garments, members and acts attributed to God; the dialogue On the Passion of the Lord, 1; the Mirror of Gospel speech, or the goad of love; the Homily on the Assumption, on the words, Jesus entered, 1; On the excellence of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1; On the image of the world, 2.

First note. Of the commentary on Matthew and the lessons on various places of the Gospels, I doubt whether they are St. Anselm's; for it is not credible that they could have been left out by Eadmer, who counted the little works so minutely. Moreover, in the Paris edition of the year 1544 [“1344” printed], in which all the works of St. Anselm are said to be, the commentary on Matthew is not found. Yet I define nothing, but open my suspicion.

Second note. The Commentaries on the letters of St. Paul in the Paris edition of the year 1544 are attributed to Herveus, not Anselm; and that title seems truer. First, because this so long and great work is not counted by Eadmer among the works of St. Anselm. Second, because the old title has Herveus. Third, because these commentaries are woven from the explanations of others, and are often lighter than the writings of St. Anselm are wont to be. The Commentaries on the Canticles and on the Apocalypse are usually attributed to Anselm of Laon; and it could easily happen that, from the likeness of the name, the works of one were attributed to the other; especially since Eadmer does not mention these commentaries.

Third note. Of the little works not found in plain words in Eadmer, it seems those three works should be admitted as genuine St. Anselm's which are against the Greeks, namely On the procession of the Holy Spirit, On unleavened and leavened bread, and On the difference of the Sacraments. For Eadmer writes, book 2, that St. Anselm, by order of Pope Urban, disputed with the Greeks in the Council of Bari and most plainly convicted them; and it is credible that those disputations were committed to writing by the same Anselm. Add that the little work on unleavened bread and the other on the difference of the Sacraments have Anselm's style and a prefixed letter of Anselm to Bishop Walram, as is clear from the beginning of the books; and in the former mention is made of the book On the procession of the Holy Spirit written by the same Anselm. Likewise the little work entitled the Goad of love seems to be the one of which Eadmer, at the beginning of the book, says Anselm wrote his prayers to God; for this little work contains nothing but pious prayers to God through all the articles of the life and passion of Christ. The little book of meditations, which contains only prayers, belongs to the same.

The little work On the garments and members and acts attributed to God, besides not being found in Eadmer, is found among the books of St. Jerome and St. Augustine under another title; but it is not those Fathers' either, as we said above. Among the works of St. Jerome it is entitled On the things attributed to God in the Scriptures; in the works of St. Augustine it is entitled On the essence of the Godhead. The dialogue On the Passion of the Lord is not St. Anselm's but of some unlearned man, who writes many silly and some false things; and calls Anselm himself blessed Anselm, which title he would never have given himself. The homily on the assumption of the Blessed Virgin is extant also among the homilies collected by Alcuin; and Alcuin preceded Anselm by three hundred years. The little work On the excellence of the Blessed Virgin does not seem to be Anselm's, not only because Eadmer does not mention it, but also because it has not the style nor the weight of Anselm. The little work On likenesses is not Anselm's but of some disciple of his; for in the last chapters he calls Anselm his father, and tells much of his words and deeds. The little work On the image of the world is usually attributed to Honorius the recluse, and contains many fabulous and silly things, unworthy to be attributed to Anselm. The little work On the will of God is very short and has nothing worthy of Anselm's mind. The little work On the measurement of the Cross I doubt whose it is, since Eadmer does not mention it.

Fourth note. Sixtus of Siena in his library attributes to St. Anselm an explanation on Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua and Judges; but whence he has this I cannot guess, since such great works escaped Eadmer.

Anselm of Laon. 1077

Anselm of Laon, the scholastic, a contemporary of St. Anselm of Canterbury or a little younger, wrote the interlinear gloss, which is extant with the ordinary gloss and that of Lyra. To him (as we said a little before) are attributed the commentaries on the Canticles and on the Apocalypse which are found among the works of St. Anselm.

Berthold of Constance. 1077

Berthold of Constance, a most faithful and pious historian, continued the chronicle of Hermann the Lame to the year 1065, and besides wrote a history, or chronology, of the deeds of his time to the year of the Lord 1100, at which time he is thought also to have died.

The Micrologus. 1077

The Micrologus, whom some name John the Micrologus, wrote the book On Church observances, which is extant with other like ones printed at Cologne and at Rome. He lived in the time of Gregory VII and of Anselm, Bishop of Lucca; for in chapter 17 of his work he says that Anselm, Bishop of Lucca, observed in celebrating Mass a certain rite of Gregory VII and commended it to be observed by himself and others; and in chapter 14 he says that in his time Gregory VII sat in the Apostolic See.

Oecumenius and Olympiodorus

Oecumenius and Olympiodorus, Greek writers, wrote chains from the ancient Fathers: the former on the Acts of the Apostles and the Letters of St. Paul, the latter on Job. When they flourished is not altogether certain; for some place them between the year 800 and 900, others after the year one thousand. Olympiodorus wrote besides a Commentary on Ecclesiastes, which is extant in the first volume of the Library of the Holy Fathers, second edition. There is extant in the same first volume a certain chain on the Letter to the Romans under the name of Theodulus, Presbyter of Coele-Syria. But that Theodulus is much older than Oecumenius himself, who is cited in this chain; indeed this chain seems wholly taken from Oecumenius, and as it were a compendium of Oecumenius's chain on the letter to the Romans. Further, Theodulus, Presbyter of Coele-Syria, died under the emperor Zeno, on the witness of Gennadius On illustrious men.

Lambert of Hersfeld. 1077

Lambert of Aschaffenburg [Hersfeld], a notable and truthful historian, especially when he treats of the contention between Pope Gregory VII and the emperor Henry the third [IV]. He wrote a German history, and begins from the founding of the world to the year of the Lord 1077. But a certain Monk of Erfurt, whose proper name is unknown, continued it to the year of the Lord 1472 [as printed].

Ingulf the Englishman. 1077

Ingulf, an Abbot in England, was living in the year of the Lord 1050, as he himself testifies at the end of his history; but he survived to the year of the Lord 1100. He wrote a history of the Monasteries of England, which was very full, but touches on much that belongs to the deeds of the kings of England. It begins from the year of the Lord 664 and ends in the year of the Lord 1067 [1066], in which King William the first began to reign. This author is extant with others who wrote on English affairs.

Marianus Scotus. 1083

Marianus Scotus, a Monk of Fulda, wrote three books of chronicles from the beginning of the world to the year of the Lord 1083. But the first book lacks its beginning; he describes universal history quite diligently. His history was continued by Dodechin, Abbot of St. Disibod, to the year of the Lord 1200.

Blessed Bruno. 1088

Bruno of Cologne, the founder of the Carthusians, was held a most learned man, as the many encomia of his wisdom in Surius on the sixth of October testify. He lived in the time of Pope Urban the second, by whom he was called to Rome from the Chartreuse. He died in the year of the Lord 1101, from his life in Surius. He wrote many things, which are extant printed at Paris by Josse Bade; the chief seem to be the Commentaries on the Psalms and the Commentaries on the letters of St. Paul.

Ivo. 1088

Ivo, Bishop of Chartres, lived in the time of Urban the second, to whom letters of his are extant; but he survived to the year 1114 [1115]. He wrote a volume of decrees. He wrote also On the divine and Church offices, and twenty-one sermons on the chief feast days, which are extant printed at Cologne with other like books. He wrote too a book On the body of the Lord, which is extant in the Library of the Holy Fathers, volume 3. He wrote lastly many letters to various persons, some of which Cardinal Baronius gives, Annals volumes 11 and 12. There is carried also under Ivo's name the Panormia, or rather Pannomia; but that Pannomia is not called Ivo's because it was composed by Ivo, but because it is for the greatest part taken from Ivo's decree; for the Pannomia is as it were a compendium of Ivo's decree; and so it should not seem strange that in book 8 there are many decrees from Pope Innocent the second and from the history of Sigebert, who were later than Ivo.

Samuel of Morocco. 1090

Samuel of Morocco, from a Jew made a Christian, wrote a most useful letter, or book, on the coming of the Messias and on the things which the modern Jews deny, and for which they persevere obstinately in Judaism. And he wrote, as he himself testifies, a thousand years after the last overthrow of Jerusalem under the emperor Titus, that is, one thousand and seventy-two years after the birth of the Lord. This book is extant in volume 4 of the Library of the Holy Fathers, second edition, and is also found printed separately.

Show the Latin (Vives edition, OCR)
De  Sancto  Anselmo  Cantuariensi.  1081. 
Sanctus  Anselmus  Cantuariensis  Archie- 
piscopus  factus  est  anno  Domini  1<>93.  tempo¬ 
re  Urbani  secundi  Pontificis  et  Henrici  tertii, 
alias  quarti  imperatoris.  Vir  fuit  natione 
Italus,  professione  Monachus,  ingenio  acer¬ 
rimo,  et  sanctitate  admiranda  cum  maxima 
prudentia  et  humilitate  conjuncta,  discipu¬ 
lus,  et  successor  Lantfranci,  de  quo  paulo 
ante  diximus  ejus  vita  ab  Edinero  fideliter 
conscripta  apud  Surium  exstat  die  21.  Apri¬ 
lis  :  obiit  feliciter  anno  aetatis  76.  salutis 
1109.  nisi  sit  error  in  notis  et  scribendum  sit 
1106.  vixit  enim  annos  tredecim  in  episco¬ 
patu,  et  creatus  fuerat  Episcopus  anno  Do¬ 
mini  1093.  quae  omnia  ex  ipso  Edinero  con¬ 
stant.  Scripsit  multa  opera,  sed  multo  plura 
ei  falso  attribuuntur.  Adscribam  hic  primum 
ea,  quae  Edinerus  familiaris  ejus  annotavit, 
et  ipso  ordine  quo  ab  Anselmo  scripta  fuisse 
narrat  Edinerus. 
Primo  igitur  scripsit  libros  tres. 
De  veritate,  1 
De  libero  arbitrio,  i 
De  casu  Diaboli,  1 
Deinde  scripsit  alios  tres. 
Monologii,  librum  1 
De  grammatica,  1 
Prosologii,  1 
Scripsit  paulo  post  responsionem  ad  quem¬ 
dam  reprehensorem  suum,  praemissa  ipsa 
reprehensione.  Hi  libri  inscribuntur,  «  Pro 
insipiente,  et  contra  insipientem  :  »  atque 
haec  opera,  antequam  Archiepiscopus  fieret, 
composuit .  Deinde  Archiepiscopus  factus 
scripsit  librum  unum  de  incarnatione  Verbi, 
quem  Urbano  Papae  obtulit,  quique  illi  gra¬ 
tissimus  fuit. 
Scripsit  deinde  apud  Capuam  in  kalia  li¬ 
brum,  quem  in  Auglia  inchoaverat,  qui  in¬ 
scribitur,  «  Cur  Deus  homo.  »  Postea  Lug¬ 
dunum  in  Gallia  scripsit  duos  libros. 
De  conceptu  virginali,  et  peccato  originis, 
lib.  1 
De  meditatione  redemptionis  humanae,  1 
Non  procul  a  fine  vitae  scripsit  ia  Anglia. 
De  concordia  praescientiae,  praedestinatio¬ 
nis  et  gratiae  Dei  cum  libero  arbitrio. 
Et  cum  moreretur,  dixit  optare  se  adhuc 
modicum  temporis,  ut  quaestionem  obscuris¬ 
simam  de  origine  animae,  quam  coeperat, 
absolveret :  sed  hoc  tempus  datum  ei  non  est, 
ut  majus  bonum  ei  in  aeternitate  daretur. 
Scripsit  denique  multas  epistolas  tum  ante 
archiepiscopatum,  tum  postea,  quarum  duo¬ 
decim  exstant.  Haec  omnia  opera  exstant 
saepius  excusa,  excepta  ultimo  et  de  his  nul¬ 
la  quaestio  fieri  debet.  Nunc  subjiciam  ope¬ 
ra,  quae  ferentur  sub  nomine  Sancti  Anselmi, 
tribus  tomis  distincta. 
i 
In  primo  tomo  : 
Commentaria  in  Matthaeum,  et  lectiones 
sive  explanationes  in  varia  loca  Evangelio- 
rum. 
In  secundo  tomo  sunt  : 
Commeiftaria  in  epistolas  Sancti  Pauli. 
Commentaria  in  Cantica,  et  in  Apocaly- 
psim. 
In  tertio  tomo  sunt  : 
'  Opuscula,  et  epistolae  :  et  quidem  opuscula 
praeter  ea,  quae  ex  Edinero  posuimus,  haec 
sunt : 
De  processione  Spiritus  sancti,  lib.  1 
De  fermentato,  et  azymo,  1 
De  diversitate  Sacramentorum,  i 
De  similitudinibus,  1 
De  voluntate  Dei,  1 
De  miseria  hominis,  i 
De  mensuratione  Crucis,  1 
Meditationum  libellus  unus,  1 
l)e  vestimentis,  membris,  et  actibus  Deo 
tributis, 
De  Passione  Domini  dialogus,  1 
432 
DE  SCRIPTORIBUS  ECCLESIASTICIS 
Speculum  Evangelici  sermonis,  sive  sti¬ 
mulus  amoris. 
Homilia  de  Assumptione  in  illud,  Intravit 
Jesus ,  1 
De  excellentia  B.  V.  Mariae,  1 
De  imagine  mundi.  2 
Observatio  prima. 
De  commentario  in  Matthseum,  et  lectio¬ 
nibus  in  varia  loca  Evangeliorum,  ambigo 
an  sint  Sancti  Anselmi  :  non  enim  credibile 
est,  ab  Edinero  potuisse  omitti,  qui  tam  mi¬ 
nute  opuscula  numeravit.  Ad  haec,  in  edi¬ 
tione  Parisiensi  anni  1344.  in  qua  dicuntur 
esse  omnia  opera  sancti  Anselmi,  commen¬ 
tarius  in  Matthseum  non  invenitur.  Nihil  ta¬ 
men  definio,  sed  suspicionem  meam  aperio. 
Observatio  secunda. 
Commentaria  in  epistolas  Sancti  Pauli  in 
editione  Parisiensi  anni  -1544.  tribuuntur 
Hersevo  non  Anselmo  :  et  videtur  ista  in¬ 
scriptio  verior.  Primo,  quia  hoc  opus  tam 
prolixum  et  magnum  ab  Edinero  non  nume¬ 
ratur  inter  opera  Sancti  Anselmi.  Secundo, 
quia  Hervaei  habet  vetus  inscriptio.  Tertio, 
quia  ista  comnentaria  contexta  sunt  ex 
aliorum  explanationibus,  et  saepe  leviora 
sunt  quam  esse  soleant  scripta  Sancti  Ansel¬ 
mi. 
Commentaria  in  Cantica  et  in  Apocaly- 
psim,  tribui  solent  Anselmo  Laudunensi,  sed 
facile  fieri  putuit,  ut  propter  nominis  simili¬ 
tudinem  opera  unius  sint  attributa  alteri, 
praesertim  cum  Edinerus  horum  commenta¬ 
riorum  non  meminerit. 
Observatio  tertia. 
Ex  opusculis,  quae  in  Edinero  non  inve¬ 
niuntur  apertis  verbis,  videntur  admittenda 
ut  germana  Sancti  Anselmi,  opera,  illa  tria 
quae  sunt  contra  Graecos,  videlicet,  de  pro¬ 
cessione  Spiritus  sancti,  de  azymo,  et  fer¬ 
mentato,  et  de  diversitate  Sacramentorum. 
Scribit  enim  Elinerus  lib.  n.  Sanctum  An- 
selmum  jussu  Urbani  Papae  in  Concilio  Ba- 
rensi  disputasse  cum  Graecis,'  cosque  aper¬ 
tissime  convicisse  :  et  credibile  est  eas  dis¬ 
putationes  ab  eodem  Anselmo  litteris  fuisse 
mandatas,  adde,  quod  opusculum  de  azymo, 
et  alteram  de  diversitate  Sacramentorum, 
habent  stylum  Anselmi,  et  praefixam  episto¬ 
lam  Anselmi  ad  Yalramum  Episcopum,  ut  ex 
initio  librorum  constat,  et  in  priore  libro  fit 
mentio  libri  de  processione  Spiritus  sancti 
ab  eodem  Anselmo  conscripti. 
Item  opusculum,  quod  inscribitur,  Stimu¬ 
lus  amoris,  videtur  esse  illud  de  quo  Edinerus 
in  prine,  lib.  dicit  Ansel.  scripsisse  precatio¬ 
nes  suas  ad  Deum,  hoc  enim  opusculum  ni¬ 
hil  aliud  continet,  nisi  pias  precationes  ad 
Deum  per  omnes  articulos  vitae,  et  passionis 
Christi. 
Eodem  pertinet  libellus  meditationum,  qui 
solas  preces  continet. 
Opusculum  de  vestimentis,  et  membris,  et 
actibus  Deo  tributis,  praeterquam  quod  non 
habetur  apud  Edinerum,  habetur  inter  libros 
Sancti  Hieronymi,  et  Sancti  Augustini,  sub 
alio  titulo,  sed  neque  illorum  Patrum  est,  ut 
supra  diximus.  Inter  opera  Sancti  Hierony¬ 
mi  inscribitur,  de  his  quae  Deo  in  Scripturis 
attribuuntur.  In  operibus  vero  sancti  Au¬ 
gustini  inscribitur,  de  essentia  divinitatis. 
Dialogus  de  Passione  Domini  non  est  San¬ 
cti  Anselmi,  sed  alicujus  indocti  hominis,  qui 
multa  inepta,  et  aliqua  falsa  scribit :  et  ipsum 
Anselmum,  vocatBeatum  Anseimum  :  quem 
titulum  ipse  sibi  nunquam  tribuisset. 
Homilia  de  assumptione  B.  Virginis  exstat 
etiam  inter  homilias  ab  Alcuino  collectas  : 
Alcuinus  autem  praecessit  Anselmum  per 
trecentis  annis. 
Opusculum  de  excellentia  B.  Virginis  non 
videtur  Anselmi,  non  solum  quia  ejus  non 
meminit  Edinerus,  sed  etiam  quia  non  habet 
stylum,  neque  gravitatem  Anselmi. 
Opusculum  de  Similitudinibus,  non  est 
Anselmi,  sed  alicujus  discipuli  ejus  :  nam  in 
ultimis  capitibus  vocat  Anselmum  patrem 
suum,  et  multa  narrat  de  ejus  verbis  et  fa¬ 
ctis. 
Opusculum  de  imagine  mundi  tribui  solet 
Honorio  incluso,  et  continet  multa  fabulosa, 
et  inepta,  indigna  quae  tribuantur  Anselmo. 
Opusculum  de  voluntate  Dei  brevissimum 
est,  et  nihil  habet  Anselmi  ingenio  dignum. 
Opusculum  de  commensuratione  Crucis, 
ambigo  cujus  sit,  cum  ejus  non  meminerit 
Edinerus. 
Observatio  quarta. 
Sixtus  Senensis  in  sua  bibliotheca  tribuit 
Sancto  Anselmo  explicationem  in  Genesim, 
Exodum,  Leviticum,  Numeros,  Deuterono¬ 
mium,  Josue,  et  Judices  :  sed  unde  boc  ha_ 
AB  ANNO  DOM.  1000.  AD  1100. 
433 
beat,  divinare  non  possum,  cum  tanta  opera 
Edinerum  latuerint. 
De  Anselmo  Laudunensi.  1077. 
Anselmus  Laudunensis  scholasticus  Sancti 
Anselmi  Gantuariensis  aequalis,  aut  paulo 
junior,  scripsit  glossam  interlinearem,  quae 
exstat  cum  glossa  ordinaria,  et  Lyrani.  Ei¬ 
dem  (ut  paulo  ante  diximus)  tribuuntur 
commentaria  in  Cantica,  et  in  Apocalypsim, 
quae  habentur  inter  opera  Sancti  Anselmi. 
De  Bertoldo  Constantiensi.  1077. 
Bertoldus  Gonstantiensis,  historicus  fide¬ 
lissimus  ,  et  pius,  continuavit  chronicum 
Hermanni  Contracti  usque  ad  annum  1065. 
et  praeterea  scripsit  historiam,  sive  chrono- 
logiam  rerum  gestarum  sui  temporis  usque 
ad  annum  Domini  1100.,  quo  tempore  puta¬ 
tur  etiam  obiisse. 
De  Micrologo.  1077. 
Micrologus,  quem  aliqui  JoannemMicrolo 
gum  nominant,  scripsit  librum  de  Eccle¬ 
siasticis  observationibus,  qui  exstat  cum 
aliis  similibus  Coloniae,  et  Romae  excusis  ; 
vixit  autem  tempore  Gregorii  VII.  et  Ansel¬ 
mi  Episcopi  Lucensis  :  nam  cap.  17.  sui  ope¬ 
ris  dicit,  Anselmum  Lucensem  Episcopum 
observasse  in  Missa  celebranda  ritum  quem¬ 
dam  Gregorii  VII.  et  sibi  atque  aliis  obser¬ 
vandum  commendasse,  et  cap.  14.  dicit, 
suo  tenipore  Gregorium  VII  in  Sede  Aposto- 
lica  sedisse. 
De  GEcumenio  et  Objmpiodoro. 
QEcumenius,  et  Olympiodorus  Graeci  scri¬ 
ptores  scripserunt  catenas  ex  antiquis  Pa¬ 
tribus  :  ille  in  Acta  Apostolorum,  et  Episto¬ 
las  S.  Pauli;  iste  in  Job  :  quo  tempore  flo¬ 
ruerint,  non  omnino  constat ;  alii  enim  col¬ 
locant  eos  inter  annum  800.  et  900,  alii  post 
annum  millesimum.  Scripsit  praeterea  Olym¬ 
piodorus  Commentarium  in  Ecclesiastem, 
quod  exstat  in  primo  tomo  bibliothecae  san¬ 
ctorum  Patrum,  editione  secunda.  Exstat  in 
eodem  primo  tomo  catena  quaedam  inEpisto. 
lam  ad  Romanos  sub  nomine  Theoduli  Pre¬ 
sbyteri  Coelesyriae.  Sed  Theodulus  ille  multo 
antiquior  est  ipso  OEcumenio  qui  in  hac  ca¬ 
tena  citatur ;  imo  ista  catena  ex  OEcumenio 
Tom.  XII. 
videtur  tota  excerpta,  et  quasi  compendium 
esse  catenae  OEcumenii  in  epistolam  ad  Ro¬ 
manos. 
Porro  Theodulus  presbyter  Coelesyriae 
obiit  sub  Zenone  imperatore,  teste  Gennadio 
de  viris  illustribus. 
De  Lamberto  Schafnaburgensi.  1077. 
Lambertus  Schafnaburgensis  insignis,  et 
verax  historicus,  praesertim  cum  de  conten¬ 
tione  inter  Gregorium  VII.  Papam,  et  Ilenri- 
cum  tertium  imperatorem  agit.  Scripsit  hi¬ 
storiam  Germanicam,  et  incipit  ab  orbe  con¬ 
dito  usque  ad  annum  Dom.  1077.  Sed  conti¬ 
nuavit  Monachus  quidam  Erphesphordensis, 
cujus  nomen  proprium  ignoratur,  usque  ad 
annum  Dom.  1472. 
De  Ingulpho  Anglo.  1077. 
Ingulphus  Abbas  in  Anglia  vivebat  anno 
Dom.  1050.  ut  ipse  testatur  in  fine  historiae 
suae  :  sed  supervixit  usque  ad  annum  Dom. 
1100.  Scripsit  historiam  Monasteriorum  An- 
gliae,  quae  amplissima  erant,  sed  attingit 
multa,  quae  ad  res  gestas  regum  Angliae 
pertinent.  Incipit  ab  anno  Dom.  664.  et  de¬ 
sinit  anno  Dom.  1067.  quo  rex  Willelmus 
primus  regnare  coepit.  Exstat  hic  auctor 
cum  aliis,  qui  de  rebus  Anglicanis  scripse 
runt. 
De  Mariano  Scoto.  1083. 
Marianus  Scotus  Monachus  Fuldensis  scri¬ 
psit  libros  tres  chronicorum  ab  initio  mundi 
usque  ad  annum  Dom.  1083.  Sed  primus  li¬ 
ber  caret  principio  :  describit  historiam  uni¬ 
versalem  satis  diligenter.  Continuavit  ejus 
historiam  Dodechinus  Abbas  S.  Dysibodi 
usque  ad  annum  Dom.  1200. 
De  B.  Brunone.  1088. 
v 
Bruno  Carthusianorum  institutor,  Colo¬ 
ni  ensis,  vir  doctissimus  habitus  est,  ut  te¬ 
stantur  multa  encomia  sapientiae  ipsius  apud 
Surium  die  sexto  Octobris.  Vixit  tempore 
Urbani  secundi  Pontificis,  a  quo  Romam 
vocatus  fuit  ex  Carthusia.  Obiit  autem  anno 
Dom.  1101.  ex  vita  ejus  apud  Surium.  Scri¬ 
psit  multa,  quae  exstant  impressa  Parisiis 
apud  Jodocum  Ascensium  :  praecipua  esse 
videntur  Commentaria  in  Psalmos,  et  Com¬ 
mentaria  in  epistolas  S,  Pauli. 
28 
434 
DE  SCRIPTORIBUS  ECCLESIASTICIS 
De  Yvone.  1088. 
Yvo  Carnotensis  Episcopus  vixit  tempore 
Urbani  secundi,  ad  quem  exstant  epistolae  : 
sed  supervixit  usque  ad  annum  1114.  Scri¬ 
psit  volumen  decretorum.  Scripsit  etiam  de 
divinis  et  Ecclesiasticis  officiis,  et  praecipuis 
festis  diebus  sermones  viginti  unum,  qui 
exstant  excusi  Colonia?  cum  aliis  similibus 
libris.  Scripsit  quoque  librum  de  corpore 
Domini,  quod  exstat  in  bibliotheca  sancto¬ 
rum  Patrum  tomo  3.  Scripsit  denique  epi¬ 
stolas  multas  ad  varios,  quarum  nonnullas 
refert  Card.  Baronius  tomo  11  et  12.  anna¬ 
lium.  Fertur  etiam  sub  Yvonis  nomine  Par- 
normia,  seu  potius  Pannomia  :  sed  ea  Pan- 
nomia  non  dicitur  Yvonis  ,  quia  sit  ab 
Yvone  composita,  sed  quia  sit  ex  decreto 
Yvonis  maxima  ex  parte  desumpta  :  est 
enim  Pannomia  quasi  compendium  decreti 
Yvonis,  et  ideo  mirum  videri  non  debet, 
quod  libro  vm.  multa  sint  decreta  ex  Inno- 
centio  secundo  Papa,  et  ex  historia  Sigeberti, 
qui  fuerunt  Yvone  posteriores. 
De  Samuele  Marochiano.  1090. 
Samuel  Marochianus  ex  Judseo  Christia¬ 
nus  scripsit  utilissimam  epistolam  ,  sive 
librum  de  adventu  jMessiae,  et  de  iis,  quse 
Judaei  moderni  negant,  et  ob  quae  in  Judai- 
smo  obstinate  perseverant.  Scripsit  autem, 
ut  ipse  testatur,  post  mille  annos  ab  ultima 
eversione  Hierosolymae  sub  Tito  imp.,id  est, 
post  annos  mille  septuaginta  duos  a  natali 
Domini.  Exstat  hic  liber  in  tomo  iv.  biblio¬ 
thecae  sanctorum  Patrum,  edit,  secunda,  et 
etiam  seorsim  excusus  invenitur. 
← Chapter 25Chapter 27 →